Was The Book “Hollywood Car Wash” Based on Katie Holmes?
The book Hollywood Car Wash by Lori Culwell is about some young actress marrying a high powered star with a secret. Rumor has it that the book could be based on Katie Holmes. Some reports are even saying that Katie read the book and is furious, but her publicist denies that. Now I’m really curious to read it and see if it actually sounds like Katie’s life. Have any of you read this novel?
Tags: katie holmes, lori culwell, hollywood car wash, rumors, novel
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Gossip, Katie Holmes
77 opinions for Was The Book “Hollywood Car Wash” Based on Katie Holmes?
Anne
Apr 14, 2007 at 10:52 am
I think that is the exact purpose of generating the controversy in the first place, to get people to read the book. I can’t stand cheap popularity and people who ride on other’s fame to promote themselves.
I think someone read the story and decided if they created a controvesy like this, it would sell more since no one is about to write a Tomkat Bio.
Katie Holmes News » Katie Holmes April 14, 2007 1:19 pm
Apr 14, 2007 at 11:34 am
[…] as saying. …New Book Hits Too Close to Holmes? TMZ.comall 3 news articles Recent Blog Posts Was The Book ?Hollywood Car Wash? Based on Katie Holmes? Rumor has it that the book could be based on Katie Holmes. Some reports are even saying that Katie […]
bored
Apr 14, 2007 at 1:43 pm
oh please…what a lame publicity ploy for a even lamer book…if you poeple can’t see through that…than there really is no hope for fat america.
Anne
Apr 14, 2007 at 2:08 pm
I am glad many can see through this cheap ploy. First, this writer masquerades like she can know the Tomkat inside story and I don’t think she has even ever met Tom and Katie. As if Tom could even let such a book be published if it was alluding to his wife’s private life. I hope people don’t buy it. But then again, America’s gullibility is astounding.
Kalista Brat
Apr 14, 2007 at 3:17 pm
Its a straight out publicity stunt, go to this website and find out about it!http://honest.bgwe.org/?p=24
Total fake story just to get publicity going for this stupid book from an amateur author!
Amelia
Apr 14, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Stupid stupid and annoying. People are too cheap these days. I hope people don’t fall for this.
Linda
Apr 14, 2007 at 6:16 pm
Kalista Brat,
This web address has no more or less credibility than the author. There is no name, no address, no nothing to prove the blog author’s claim. I do not necessarily believe the book’s author but your link is not convincing me of anything, one way or the other.
Helen
Apr 14, 2007 at 6:59 pm
OMG! I can’t believe this…another idiot jumping on the band wagon to make many out of Tom and Katie by using her to get publicity for his book.
Katie Holmes News » Katie Holmes April 14, 2007 7:35 pm
Apr 14, 2007 at 7:34 pm
[…] girlfriend Kate Middleton have called it quits in what?s being billed as an amicable split. …Was The Book ?Hollywood Car Wash? Based on Katie Holmes? Rumor has it that the book could be based on Katie Holmes. Some reports are even saying that Katie […]
Linda
Apr 15, 2007 at 7:21 am
I am not a hater. I have said many times I am a Katie fan. I thought we were asked to not run people off, Samuel L.
Telling me to shoo is exactly that kind of behaviour.
As for not caring if I believe the blog… my point is that if you want to successfully refute something you must have good, solid sources. The blog provided by Kalista is not a good, solid, source. The novel is also NOT a good, solid, source.
Anne, how have I ever tried to ruin this site?
Remember what Leora posted. You were all happy she made the statement. Please try to follow her words.
Jennifer
Apr 15, 2007 at 8:13 am
Ok, I’m a bit naive and gulable ’cause reading Leora’s entry made me think about going and reading the book. But lucky for me, I read your posts! a sneaky marketing stunt?
amy
Apr 15, 2007 at 8:42 am
why buy the book when we can sit back and watch this drama unfold in real life and in real time? i for one am looking forward to the next installment
amy
Apr 15, 2007 at 9:22 am
as for katie being FURIOUS when she read this book…of course she was…bet it didn’t have as many pretty pictures as ‘the cat in the hat’ and the other books she is trying to learn to read now she is ‘hollywood royalty’..
Anne
Apr 15, 2007 at 1:02 pm
Sorry Linda for any offence. Good poimt Amy, Tomkat is more interesting in real life that from pretenders like that.
I don’t think Kalista’s link was meant to be authentic but to give someone else’s interpretation of this publicity stunt.
Helen
Apr 15, 2007 at 1:44 pm
People please lets all be civil to each other and maybe we’ll find out we are all interesting people. I for one will tolerate someone till they cross the line like couple of people have done.
Carla
Apr 15, 2007 at 2:12 pm
KM and TC are a loser couple, with a loser child. However, both have been more populare since they started dating and after they married each other.
Carla
Apr 15, 2007 at 2:22 pm
Oh, KH can read? She finished HS but never went to college. I guess she can skip that now, because she married into hollywood royalty. Since she likes to go online alot, maybe she can get a degree online.
Linda
Apr 15, 2007 at 4:01 pm
I do wish Katie had gone to college. So many stars find time to get degrees. Many stars even go to excellent schools. If Katie really wanted to, she could have finished at Columbia. Instead she took one class… a summer photography class. I wish she had made different choices but I am not her advisor.
Helen
Apr 15, 2007 at 4:14 pm
Linda, I read that Katie turned down Columbia University to play Joey Potter on Dawson’s…I’m selfish so I’m glad she did otherwise she might have never become an actress and we wouldn’t know her. Apparently there was a rumor that Katie given up on her education eight years after she was accepted by prestigious Columbia University.
Here is the full story…
The future wife of Tom Cruise was forced to defer her further education at Columbia back in 1998 when she landed a role in the hit TV show “Dawson’s Creek.”
Holmes has been deferring her admission annually ever since, but last week her father called the college withdrawing his daughter’s name, according to entertainment news Web site TMZ.com.
Ginger
Apr 15, 2007 at 4:29 pm
I wish she hadn’t turned it down too since it was reported that she was a brilliant A student but I don’t know what she would have used the degree for any way apart from saying she has it. Her dad wanted her to be a doctor but she can be stubborn when she wants to.
Bill Gates said he dropped out of Uni (he was at Harvard)because he found it time wasting and not stimulating to thought.
I was going through an old magazine or 2000 and a Seer told Katie that she would have a child in 2006! She protested but how right the seer was! I have always thought those seers are cons. I am going to visit one and ask them to tell me only the good things. I can’t live in dread, so I will ask for only positives.
Carla
Apr 15, 2007 at 6:59 pm
That’s debateable. There are still rumours that she had her baby in Dec. 05. Anyway, the fortune tellers are good, only if they tell the positive things. Nobody, especially the X generation, can handle negative thoughts.
As for Bill Gates, he is one in a million and the rest of us need an undergraduate or graduate education, which is not a waste of time and is quite stimulating.
Anne
Apr 15, 2007 at 9:07 pm
Carla, if you provide a date she had Suri in December, I can help you locate Katie’s where abouts on that day and soon there after. She was in public every two to three days, even her birthday was at a toy store and we have pictures. Date please……?
Ginger is right, many successful people do not have university degrees. Practically 90% of the people in show biz don’t, actors, musicians, TV personality and even leading business men like Phillip Green of Top shop, Donald Trump, Richard Branson are a few off my finger tips. Not every one needs to go to Uni like you. Why would Dakota fanning go to Uni to study some thing she has excelled at since she was 4? Infact she should be lecturing!!!!
amy
Apr 16, 2007 at 1:26 am
anne..are you for REAL….i am not commenting either way on the conspiracy theories about sausage nose suri’s real date of birth…if she IS tom’s biological child she could be 27 for all we know…its not like he has any wonderful ‘height genes’ to pass on down to her..but as for your weak argument that katie couldn’t possibly have given birth in december because she was photographed every second day…SO??? i didn’t know you were confined to a cell for a month after childbirth…it would be easy to pop a chinesed eye fur ball out, then pop out for a photo op..all WITH a pregnant looking stomach….if you want to debate things you strongly believe in, at least think through your argument first…and as for katie not having a degree…you are right - why does she need one…heidi fleiss didn’t have one either…she sold herself for money too didn’t she?
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 2:05 am
Katie’s lack of further education shines through with the profound and deep comments she makes when she is interviewed: “He’s amazing”. “I’m honored to be her mother”. “I’m pumped”. Or does she mean “Pimped”?
Helen
Apr 16, 2007 at 3:17 am
Carla, why do you care if Katie goes to college or not? you don’t see her wasting her time on this website blogging about someone else life do you?
Helen
Apr 16, 2007 at 3:18 am
Anne, why do you waste you time talking to a brick wall?
Helen
Apr 16, 2007 at 3:35 am
Amy, in the future people might take you seriously if you didn’t call an innocent child who has never done anything wrong and didn’t choose her parents a loser or all sort of names. grow up!
amy
Apr 16, 2007 at 4:18 am
i never called suri a loser…a bastard perhaps…not a loser though… and by the way, i also don’t remember whining or even claiming..that people weren’t taking me seriously….look, as for my comments about ‘their’ child..her eyes look asian TO ME, the amount of hair she had when born made her look like a fur ball TO ME…i don’t rubbish you for your crush on katie do i? no, didn’t think so…each to their own…and your’e right, we don’t see katie wasting her time on blogging sites..she is far too busy wasting her time on her endless and aimless shopping sprees…again, each to their own, don’t you agree Helen?
Helen
Apr 16, 2007 at 4:37 am
My mistake Amy it was Carla who called Suri a loser and you just called her sausage nose.
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 6:36 am
Ok, so the child is a sausage-nosed, furry-ball loser. What’s the difference with what we say or don’t say? And, I don’t care if KH goes to college or not. She obviously felt that she didn’t need to defer admission anymore, after realizing that she didn’t need to independently help herself to become rich and famous. She had TC to do that for her. Actually, she had daddy do everything for her, so it doesn’t surprise me that she switched over to another daddy, only this one is a sugar-daddy.
Helen
Apr 16, 2007 at 6:39 am
Carla, you know she was making her own many before meeting Tom and she was famous and rich already. don’t you know? If I’m not mistaken she got $1m for Batman…so that is more money than what a doctor makes in a year.
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 6:44 am
By the way, I read some of the interviews that KH and the others gave, who are staying in Shreveport, LA (Louisianna) and they really put-down the locals there. They made comments insinuating that no one is rich enough down there to spend money and go shopping. Now that is wrong to do. They are guests in that area, and they should act accordingly. And KH went shopping at the local Target, imagine that. I bet that little walk up and down those aisles brought back fond memories of the way she used to shop and live, before her gold-digger days.
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 6:49 am
Helen:
Yes, you are correct, now that you mentioned it. However, didn’t she make Batman around the time she met TC? I’m not sure about that time frame.
Surgeons, in NYC, make around that much. But yes, she really bummeranged her career.
Linda
Apr 16, 2007 at 7:09 am
Getting a college education, for many already rich, is about the experience, broadening your small universe, and learning to think/debate with purpose. For the already wealty an education is not necessarily about making more money.
Yes, Anne and Ginger, you are correct that many successful people did not attend an institution of higher learning. We could just as easily compile a list of successful actors that did attend university. This is an argument that does not hold water either way. It is a personal choice. For Katie, it is my opinion that, it was an unfortunate choice. Most families are proud of a child who is the first in the family to go to college. In Katie’s case she is the first of many generations not to attend.
Anne
Apr 16, 2007 at 7:42 am
I think if Bill Gates thought he did not need it, then it is not that important if you are excellent at what you do and it is a personal choice. I think you people here boast of some form of college degrees but it does not shine through you posts especially Carla and that I say is tragic.
On that note, I will take Helen’s advice and quit hitting a brick wall. In any case, I don’t think I should have anything to say to someone who stoops as low as to attack innocent defenceless babies. So sat whatever you want, ignoring worked in the past……
amy
Apr 16, 2007 at 7:54 am
wow, you sure are a drama queen anne…no one here has ATTACKED any baby…. there are lots of ugly babies in the world…just because suri is the ‘offspring’ of a celeb/celeb couple..doesn’t guarantee that she will be better looking than other babies…
LIBRAESQUE
Apr 16, 2007 at 10:11 am
amy, these idiots cling desperately and loudly to their theory that she was photographed ever other day blahblah, and even though I’ve commented 375 times that almost every celeb mom is photographed out and about within 3-7 days, goes right over their head. Theres no use trying to explain logic to these airheads.
As far as this book goes, I think it’s hilarious. I LOVE that this author flew under the radar of Cruises sue-happy legal team and got this book published.
As for the idiot above who said the author probably hasn’t even met KH or TC, I think I read that she hadn’t….all the information she based the book on was provided by a friend of Katies, hence the statement “that person will probably never speak to me again”
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 12:24 pm
Anne:
My graduate education does not shine through, because I poke fun at a baby? HA ha ha, that’s ridiculous. Maybe my education has allowed me to see things that others, such as yourself, are blindsided to see. This fab couple photoged themselves every frickin week, during her pregnancy, then when the mystery child is supposedly born, the kid disappears, with it’s mother, for many months. Then, when Vanity Fair sends photog to their place in Col., it takes the photoshoppers three weeks to get the pictures right. The first picture, remember the one with a hat or some furry object on the kid’s head, and hidden under daddy’s leather coat, is a complete farce, and the kid never looked like that again. I have not ever given you a personal attack, but you lowered yourself, for the sake of Katie, to give me one. Well, maybe she’ll remember you someday for that, do you think? hahahahaha
amy
Apr 16, 2007 at 12:29 pm
HILARIOUS….comparing bill gates to katie holmes…the similarities are…???? what exactly ARE the similarites Anne…
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 12:39 pm
The only similarities I can think of are that they both look like boys, and they both got rich using someone else.
amy
Apr 16, 2007 at 12:43 pm
listen tomkat fanatics…when tom said in one of his films to ‘respect the cock’…he WASN’T talking about himself you know, so calm down..whats HE done to earn ANY of our respect?? can anyone here answer that?? (serious question)
Carla
Apr 16, 2007 at 3:55 pm
I respected KH until she and TC pulled their stunts on the public, mostly with the Suri stuff; virgin-no virgin, marriage-no marriage,baby- no baby, birth- no birth, pregnant- not pregnant. To me, it shows that they don’t care what the public thinks, who by the way, has made them rich and has given them the luxury of the high celeb life in which they relish. If they come clean with their stint, then maybe they will regain the respect from their ex-fans, and people will lay-off on Suri.
Jennifer
Apr 17, 2007 at 5:32 am
# 41 Tom Cruise earns my respect bigtime.
When he was younger he was just another heart throb actor to me..(Risky Business,Top Gun..)
Tom was obviously very LUCKY cause now he is a BIG PLAYER in Hollywood business. Good for him. I think he deserves it. I’ve never perceived him to be intentionally hurting anyone….If he hurt people’s feelings on the Mental-Health-Drugs issue, I honestly beleive that he didn’t mean to. His intention was only to try and help people from being reliant on these drugs, which I have heard “put you out-of-it” a little.
I respect a guy who has integrity, and he showed that in the early years he was married to Nicole.
He gains my admiration and respect also for being a great father to his kids. The kind of father who would go out of his way to help them.
I respect how he holds himself in public…And then he expresses his excitement, joy or happiness with us so freely. I don’t think he holds much back. It’s great! I love it.
..see the way he always leads Katie by the hand.. opens doors for her? That’s my idea of a gentleman, and he treats HER like a Lady.
..don’t see too much of that kind of respect anywhere thesedays.
Jennifer
Apr 17, 2007 at 5:52 am
and #42 I think she probably really beleived she could hold her legs crossed till she walked down the aisle. But… obviously… it all got a bit too HOT for her! He probably swept her off her feet and she was so passionate that she wanted to fall in LOVE more than wait for marriage. As they say Love is blind. I respect that you think she should have held out.So, Virgin obviously is not anymore.
Maybe she was then getting married but didn’t expect to fall pregnant so quickly? Probably WAS hard for her to accept and deal with that fact! I’m glad she had the baby first. She was then able to have her dream wedding - without the huge belly.
Did Tomkat explain why they kept quiet around the
birth of Suri?
Is there any reason to want to keep her birth date secret? I don’t know what date she was born, can’t remember.
opal22
Apr 17, 2007 at 5:59 am
THE person MAKES a person…
a degree does not make a person.
Katie is young and she will find herself soon.
I bet she will educate herself more later on down the track when she decides on something…
I think this now, though I might be wrong later.
Carla
Apr 17, 2007 at 7:16 am
Higher education polishes a person, and gives them insight and self-confidence into living a fuller, healthier lifestyle. If KH had gone to college first before meeting TC, maybe she would have had insight into what kind of man would have been better for her, and the self-confidence into not accepting the first head-over-heels romance that came her way. Maybe having a higher education would have helped her to make educated deicisions based upon her researching TC, his history with other women and his consitency of the way he treated them. I’m not just referring to being wealthy. I’m referring to what type of man and similarities that they should have in common, in order to have a long and healthy life together. She was raised Catholic, and supposedly stood by the values that her religion taught her, until she met and was influenced by TC. He preyed on her volunerability. She was weak-willed and lacked in making educated decisions for herself. SHe changed everything for him; her moral standards, her friends, her religion, her hobbies, her appearance. He changed nothing for her. That’s not what a marriage is about. It’s about compromise from both people involved. If TC really respected her and loved her, why didn’t he allow her to hold by her high moral standards, until they got married?
Nicole dropped out of high school and never finished. SHe was also vulnerable. If you notice, TC doesn’t choose a highly educated woman, who is strong-willed and independent.
Regarding TC’s children; he is a very selfish man. He has full custody of his two adopted children, and Nicole barely gets to physically be with them. It is reported that she visits them online, using a webcam.
TC doesn’t treat his women like they are equal to him; he treats them like they are property and a possesion. A true gentleman doesn’t lead a woman around, while walking (as a for instance), he walks either behind the woman, or alongside the woman. The only reason why he walks in front of Katie is because he wants to be noticed FIRST. He is the one who always appears in photos with a frontal image. KH is always the one who slips into the photo with a side view. Remember the wedding photos? I thought they looked so sad with KH leaning into the photos, while TC was always appearing in the center. SHe was the bride and the bride is supposed to be the center of attention. But she wasn’t. That’s because she is not the big celeb who people come up to for an autograph while she stands in the background, patiently watching. That’s because she is NOT the object of attention. TC is.
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 7:21 am
She is 28… that is not so young. If she is old enough to be a wife and mother than it follows that she is certainly old enough to be concerned with an education. Being a stand out student in High School will only carry you so far.
opal22…Your statement of ” the person makes the person..” makes very little sense. A person is nothing without an education. An education can come from many sources; it does not have to formal and does need to to end with a degree. However, an education is the ONLY thing a person will never have taken from them. Katie should have jumped at Columbia when she had the chance. It is possible, unlikely, but possible that she will lose Tom, her money, her child, and all her Hollywood friends; but her education she would have always. Many very successful stars have deferred careers for a short time to complete an education. Katie had the time, she did not have the inclination.
Many here seem a bit stary eyed and romantic. These qualities a fine, if tempered with a bit of pragmatism. For those who have scoffed at education here is the link for a definition of pragmatism. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pragmatism
Before I am being accussed of hating. I like Katie, but, like her family, I wish she had gone to Columbia. It would have sent a great message to all her young female fans.
amy
Apr 17, 2007 at 7:22 am
well said Carla!!
amy
Apr 17, 2007 at 7:30 am
Linda,I find it absolutely incredible that you are here having to DEFEND education!!
I find it unbelievable that people are not only debating with you,but also seem to firmly believe that given the choice, ANYONE should choose prostitution (or marriage to cruise) over an education.
Have any of you actually seen Katie being interviewed? she appears to have a very limited vocabulary….barely high school equivalent in my opinion…
As a mother, education will, in a few years, become a topic that both Katie and Tom will have to consider for their daughter..unless they keep with the tradition of home schooling that his elder children are under at the moment..
You can be the richest person in the world and yet have nothing..something Katie should bear in mind…
Carla
Apr 17, 2007 at 7:32 am
Jennifer:
TC never really gave a reason why they hid their child from the public view for so long. Rumors came out that they were not offered a substantial amount of money for Suri’s pictures, unlike the Pitt’s baby, who was offered in the millions.
WHy is Suri’s birth date questionable?
Suri’s bith date, is April 18. Rumor has it that because of past information about TC, that he was ridden sterile, due to contracting Mumps while being a teenager, he was unable to sire any children. ANd that he is professed as being gay. Thus, during his first marriage of 10 years (to Mimi), he was childless. During his second marriage of 10 years (to Micole), he was also childless biologically. They both adopted two children. SO, the question remains then, how could he suddenly impregnate a young woman within a few weeks of them fornicating, when he couldn’t with women he fornicated for 20 years?
Rumor has it that KH was pregnant with her baby when she met TC. Since he needed to continue to cover up the fact that he may be gay, and since KH needed to cover up the fact that she may have disregarded her high-moral standards and screwed around and got pregnant, that they both would have the perfect cover-up. The only problem was the time frame of the pregnancy.
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:01 am
To add fuel to this fire…
When Mimi Rogers first filed divorce papers the reason she sited was a lack of marital coitus. When the Church of Scientology took over the divorce, (Mimi was considering leaving the church at the time) she changed her story a little. She stated that Tom had wanted to keep his “instrument pure”. In Scientology lingo this statement means to keep your body unadulterated by anything, including sexual intercourse, as to more fully devote yourself to an endeavor.
This in no way means he was sterile but it is a bit curious that a young man with a hot wife would choose to not have sex with her. By the way, this is not rumor. These facts are things both Tom and Mimi spoke about at the time and can be easily researched.
Soon after the divorce Mimi did back down a bit on her public statements. Many say because of presure from the powers that be withing Scientology. She has since had nothing but nice and complementary things to say about Tom Cruise and his subsequent wives.
In fact Mimi was one of Tom’s biggest supporters after the infamous Oprah appearance, not that anyone listened to her. She has never been quite the “A-lister” that Tom is now.
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:05 am
To add fuel to this fire…
When Mimi Rogers first filed divorce papers the reason she sited was a lack of marital coitus. When the Church of Scientology took over the divorce, (Mimi was considering leaving the church at the time) she changed her story a little. She stated that Tom had wanted to keep his “instrument pure”. In Scientology lingo this statement means to keep your body unadulterated by anything, including s**ual intercourse, as to more fully devote yourself to an endeavor.
This in no way means he was sterile but it is a bit curious that a young man with a hot wife would choose to not have intercourse with her. By the way, this is not rumor. These facts are things both Tom and Mimi spoke about at the time and can be easily researched.
Soon after the divorce Mimi did back down a bit on her public statements. Many say because of presure from the powers that be withing Scientology. She has since had nothing but nice and complementary things to say about Tom Cruise and his subsequent wives.
In fact Mimi was one of Tom’s biggest supporters after the infamous Oprah appearance, not that anyone listened to her. She has never been quite the “A-lister” that Tom is now.
Carla
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:16 am
Linda:
This is quite interesting. He used to be a Catholic, and wanted to be a priest. The question is; is he really gay, and is that why he never wanted to “touch” a woman?
Then, since he is a professed scientologist in high ranking order, and according to your information that you provided about the pureness in his male organ, how then could KH have gotten pregnant? Did he go against the scientology grain and decide to “get some”, or as rumors go, was she already pregnant with someone else’s baby, and he decided to “take the credit”?
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:40 am
Just to be clear:
In Scientology the “instrument” is the human body, as a whole and not simply the male organ.
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:41 am
Just to be clear:
In Scientology lingo the “instrument” is the human body, as a whole, and not simply the male organ. I appologize if that was a bit muddy.
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:43 am
Sorry for the muliple post. Oopsie.
Carla
Apr 17, 2007 at 8:50 am
And then if TC is so firm with his scientology beliefs, that he never allowed himself to falter against them, even in his marriages, why then, would he disrespect another’s religious beliefs, and allow that person, KH, to falter against her beliefs?
Which means that he didn’t allow her to falter, he just picked-up the pieces. Thus, if Suri was born April 18th, that made her 7 1/2 months of age during their wedding. She had hard-soled shoes on at that time, and was always seen trying to struggle out of Katie’s arms when she held the infant. Babies at 7 1/2 months old do not normally learn to walk, until they are closer to 1 years old. WHich brings the birth date more actually towards a late Nov-early Dec. date. WHen KAtie was very pregnant, and TC had taken her everywhere, on boats, planes and such, she was “rushed” to the hospital for high-blood pressure and dehydration. That was in early Dec. 05. Rumor has it that she had the baby then.
LIBRAESQUE
Apr 17, 2007 at 10:25 am
Also, they went to Ohio in late Dec., something the two of them hadn’t done, and there was a huge blowout fight and they ended up leaving three days early. THAT would indicate to me that the parents were furious over something….like their daughter lying about WHEN she got pregnant
Jennifer from Australia
Apr 17, 2007 at 11:26 am
Not debating against education at all. I think what you have said about it is very valid. But I’m just saying that I don’t judge a person on their education level only. That’s all, to me that’s not a valid reason to criticise someone, in this instance, Katie Holmes.
Libraesque, you mentioned “Ghetto trash” earlier on, I wouldn’t think everyone who has to live in the ghettos are trash. That’s not a very nice thing to be saying.
Jennifer from Australia
Apr 17, 2007 at 11:29 am
SHE probably seduced HIM…for all WE know?
Who knows…Who cares?….
I’m not THAT obsessed!
Jennifer from Australia
Apr 17, 2007 at 11:40 am
Carla, or whoever, you reply to me that a person is NOTHING without an education.
Right now, she hasn’t got an education but, she IS SOMETHIN” ALLRIGHT! - She ain’t nothing, that’s for sure.
LIBRAESQUE
Apr 17, 2007 at 12:16 pm
what is she???
Jennifer
Apr 17, 2007 at 12:21 pm
Liberesque, What are you ?
LIBRAESQUE
Apr 17, 2007 at 12:29 pm
you’re responding to a question with a question…..why is that? Just answer my question IF YOU CAN. What is she, what kind of “somethiin” is she
Jennifer
Apr 17, 2007 at 12:39 pm
hmmm….this isn’t right…
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 1:38 pm
Just let’s get on about Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes news. So I guess noones gonna read this book then huh? Well…I think I might.
Jennifer
Apr 17, 2007 at 1:43 pm
AGAIN Libraesque you ask me a question where the answer is LOGICAL AND OBVIOUS. Yet you still ask me. So what’s the catch hey? I’m not falling for that bait Sweethart!
LOVE ‘EM OR HATE ‘EM
TOMKAT ARE KOOLKATS TO ME.
amy
Apr 17, 2007 at 1:50 pm
I choose to HATE ‘EM… thanks for the option jennifer…
amy
Apr 17, 2007 at 1:52 pm
I’m going to read this book…I want to send it to tomkat first so that my edition will get autographed…
Linda
Apr 17, 2007 at 2:06 pm
Hello, second Linda. You are not me. We have two Linda’s in the house. Or someone has taken my identily.
Carla
Apr 17, 2007 at 2:09 pm
Amy:
Don’t give a return address. Some friends of his may call for a visit.
libraesque
Apr 17, 2007 at 2:31 pm
yea, I didn’t think you’d answer, there’s NOTHING logical or obvious about TK
Miapocca
Apr 17, 2007 at 3:29 pm
Hellllllllllooooooooooooooooooooooooo Folks
MIAPOCCA
Apr 18, 2007 at 11:19 am
Apparently the Katies holmes hook was used to publicize this book..even though there might be some truth that it was based on her parts of her life, I dont think she read teh book or commneted on it becuase the author couldnt say so in her interview
I suspect teh character is a mix of teh more sensational aspects of hollywood starlets with a lot more attention to Holmes life
I went looking for the book and the stor didnt have it..see when you get a really nice barnes and noble with a chair and fire place, you really spend a good evening reading away….I used to do that way back and could fininsh a book in a week by hanging out in teh store about an hour or som before going to work….I wish there was a book I-store..you download all teh latest reads online..that will be fantastic
Shadow Girl
Apr 18, 2007 at 7:21 pm
I agree, Mia.
Can’t wait to see what KH and TC get into next! I hope he gets himself into a real…..pickle of a situation.
Jennifer from Australia
Apr 20, 2007 at 8:48 am
Shadow Girl: So then you’re obviously wishing the worst for Tom Cruise, Shadow Girl.
That’s not nice. But don’t ever complain if someone else wishes the worst for YOU one day. OKAY?
Me
Apr 20, 2007 at 8:49 am
Shadow Girl, karma will get you or Karma will be good for Tom either way.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: