Tom Cruise Angry At Kidman Over Vanity Fair Interview
Tom Cruise is reportedly really angry at ex wife Nicole Kidman over her interview with Vanity Fair:
Tom Cruise is said to be livid and upset after ex-wife Nicole Kidman revealed shocking details about their 11-year relationship, NW reports
Speaking to US magazine Vanity Fair, Nicole has talked openly for the first time about the miscarriage she suffered while she was married to Tom, and has admitted she was warned against marrying the Hollywood superstar in 1990.
Tom, who’s always remained tight-lipped about his marriage to Nicole, is said to be furious that she’s chosen to reveal information about their private life.
Although none of Nicole’s revelations portray Tom in a bad light, he’s said to be concerned she may upset their kids, Isabella, 14, and Connor, 12.
"From the minute Tom and I were married, I wanted to have babies," says Nicole. "And we lost a baby very early on, so that was really very traumatic. That’s when it came that we would adopt Bella."
Source Tags: tom cruise, adoption, vanity fair
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Exes, Tom Cruise
63 opinions for Tom Cruise Angry At Kidman Over Vanity Fair Interview
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 4:01 am
I don’t believe this story but I myself was disappointed by Kidman, the way she spoke about why they adopted Isabella was totally wrong and could hurt her feelings. I think Tom will never speak about this so publicly like she did for his children sake.
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 6:05 am
I read the article also. There is nothing wrong with her stating that she and Tom had a misscarriage, they had been trying, she had a hard time to get pregnant. To state they decided to adopt, nothing wrong with that statement. I thought it was interesting when she stated she was blindsided when Tom filed for a divorce. Yes, someone warned her about not marring Tom because it would affect her carrier. Well, look at Katie. She and Tom don’t leave each other side and she has only made one movie. Yes, she could be staying home with Suri, but, they are always together. Tom has molded Katie to who she is now,she even changed her religion and Nicole refused to change her belief. In a interview, Katie has stated she was studying Tom beliefs. I think if Nicole acted like Katie and did everything like Tommy that they would still be married. Nothing against Katie, but I think Tom is on the controlling side.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 7:30 am
I disagree.
Yes there was nothing wrong with her stating she had miscarriage but to actually say the reason they adopted Isabella was because of that was wrong. In the article she mentions that adoption has always been behind her mind since her mother’s sister was adopted so she should have left it that way and not said anything about Isabella’s adoption. In my opinion Isabella might feel second best and etc.
I haven’t read the actually interview and only part of it from other media outlets and I’m not sure if its her or the media who quote her as saying “she has wanted a child of her own”, and she herself said “I think I would be very sad if I wasn’t able to have a baby. Keith knows I want one and he has been getting there slowly.”
“My husband really wants a couple of years, he said, ‘where I just have you’. It’s kind of romantic. It’s really honest. So as a woman I sort of hear that loud and clear and go, ‘OK, I get that’.”
Hello? What about her other two kids she already has? Even her husband said “My husband really wants a couple of years, he said, ‘where I just have you’.” SO where does that leave Connor and Isabella? hasn’t he realized she already has kids?
She also spills the beans after all this time but doesn’t bother to tell everything and hints there is something behind Isabella’s adoption but leaves it by saying “There’s a complicated background to that, given that I never speak much about many things. One day, maybe that story will be told.”
Also Nicole Kidman was actually studying Scientology for many year before she decided its not for her.
Anon.
Sep 14, 2007 at 8:40 am
If TC is such the father of the year, where has Connor and Isabella been these last nine months. According to the press and media, TC, KH, AND Suri are the perfect little family. What about the other two? Why are they hardly portrayed with this happy little family? They are apart of it, aren’t they or just when it is convenient, like Suri? (I guess Suri can promote more movies for TC and KH than Connor and Isabella!!)
Compared to what some Celebs say in the news, what Nicole said is benign.
At least she does not go around saying that her marriage to TC was a mistake, like TC has said in the past, or that her current means more than any of the others, including the other parent. Or better yet, to replace the other parent with the new honey, as TC has tried to do with KH as a replacement for Nicole. This is more tramatizing to kids than to say “We tried and then decided to adopt.” Besides, that is usually the way it goes anyway. MOst people who have kids of their own don’t adopt. Katie certainly hasn’t adopted. She got herself knocked up so TC would marry her.
BIG QUESTION FOR ALL YOU FANS: Would Tom had really married or still be with KH if she had not had Suri?
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 9:05 am
Oh my, hold your horses Anon., where in my post did I say Tom Cruise is the father of the year? Yes I believe he is a good dad to all his children and we don’t have to see them everyday to prove that.
Like some ppl here you’re trying to exaggerate things as well. Its hasn’t been 9 months since we saw Connor and Bella. The last time we heard about them or saw them was March, April and May. In march Tom, Katie and Suri were photographed at Connor and Bella games and in April Bella was photographed with Tom and Katie viewing Victoria Beckham’s new house and after that both Bella and Connor were in Australia in MAY with their mother and Nicole herself talks about both of them in her new interview and she said Connor was with her on the set working.
If the media doesn’t “portray” them as family that is not Tom Cruise fault but the media. Both Tom and Katie have been very affectionate and loving toward all his children. They both attend their games when they’ve games but for the last 2 months School was out we haven’t seen them but I’m sure we’ll see them once Tom and Katie are back to LA and they might even join them now in Germany where Nicole Kidman will start filming there soon.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 9:08 am
PLUS Tom cruise has NEVER said his marriage to Nicole is a mistake!!! Check your facts first next time!!
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 9:24 am
First of all, we don’t know if Tom sid this. He seems to keep things private, when it comes to these feelings. I guess the reason why I said that it’s not wrong to make a statement about adopting after failing to carry a baby, we have done it 5 times. The kids ask why we adopted. We said that we couldn’t have kids of our own and then told them that we wanted a family and we choose you guys to make our family. We picked you to be our sons and daughter. The thing that I like about what Nicole said about her miscarriage. She answered some people questions about her miscarriage. Some peeople thought that she had a miscarriage after Tom filed for the divorce. She stop those horrible rumours and she did it on Ophra a few years ago. She told her too that she didn’t miscarriage after their break up and she was very happy and blessed with her two kids. Her two kids are old enough to understand why they are so blessed to be picked to be her kids. No Tom has never said that his marriage to Nicole was a mistake, BUT!!!on Opra, the day he jumped on her couch, he told Ophra that he has never been this happy, being in love with Katie. On another show Ophra question that statement he made and she wondered how Nicole would feel knowing that Tom said that. We can all twist words around. But Tom is Tom and I still think he’s a control freak. But thats my opinion.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 9:56 am
hhhmmm interesting. I don’t see anything wrong with her statement either, although I did NOT buy the magazine and read the whole article, so maybe I’m missing something.
I think what would be more upsetting than what I read above, if I were the other two kids is how he announced on national television that he has NEVER been this happy (with katie). Does that leave them feeling that his time with them and Nicole wasn’t a happy one for him????
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:05 am
It’s pretty well known in the biz that Nicole was pregnant BEFORE she and Tom got together as a couple. Just like with katie, he saw his golden opportunity to be with a woman who was already pregnant to solidify his charade of a hetero hot leading man, instead of remaining in a marriage with a wife that was NOT content with his h o m o s e x u a lity and their complete lack of a s e x life. Mimi has been vocal about that in the past. I think THAT fact may be what she is talking about with this statement: “There’s a complicated background to that, given that I never speak much about many things. One day, maybe that story will be told.”
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:12 am
I hope that it isn’t true about Tom being upset with Nicole’s Vanity Fair interview. I haven’t read the article but what I have read about it doesn’t seem to have any content that could be thought of as negative, in my opinion. I think Tom is lucky that is all Nicole said. I could fill a couple of pages about my ex…none of it good or positive. I think if this is true then Tom needs to consider counseling for control issues.
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:22 am
That was the point Ophra made. She was talking to someone about how happy they were, can’t remember who this was, he was a country singer. She said that she remembered Tom Cruise making that statement and she wondered how Nicole felt, If it made her feel that Tom was never really happy with her all those years.
She said: In Feb. 2001, her world imploded when cruise abruptly filed for divorce. She was blindsided and devastated by the end of her marriage.
“MY agent told me “Once you become Mrs. Tom Cruise, you do know your career is going to die.” she recalls. You’re going to absolutely shoot yourself in the foot.” I was appalled. I was like HEllo? I’m in love and I don’t care if it’s shooting myself in the foot. I’d much rather be married and have a family.”
She later states she has no regrets being married to TOM and she also says she doesn’t want to discuss scientology, but states that her kids are scientologist.
If Tom is mad, then he needs to get over it. He’s done some stupid thing in public with Katie and maybe he should think about that also.
Katie moves in, not married, has a baby, not married, has his hands all over Katie and the kids are exposed to that…double standerds?? Nicole is a Catholic and in her eyes maybe she thought that Tom was exposing their kids to the fast way he went with KATIE…Nicole doesn’t want her kids to be eposed to the public and she wants to be respected..Look at all the exposures there are with Tom , Katie and SURI..I don’t think there is another celebraty being exposed as much as Tomkat and their kitten.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:34 am
well……toms image is EVERYTHING to him, which is why he has always been a litigious person, and the knocks he’s taken in the past two years alone, and the attempts at damage control (which have failed miserably) I can see how he’d be angry…….I also find the timing of this interview puzzling….this is ANCIENT history…why is it being brought up now? What’s the point????
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:37 am
joj0f7:
Its great that you’ve adopted and you’ve had the talk with them but don’t get me wrong I think you will eventually let them know why they were adopted but not publicly like Kidman did after all these years strongly guarding their privacy and like I’ve posted some of the quotes from her interview e.g. her husband wanting her just for himself and her wanting a baby of her own, must be a bit hurtful to the kids but I don’t doubt she loves them.
Regarding Tom’s comment about being happy with Katie, here is what he told Good Housekeeping last year. He says that he didn’t think that either one of his previous wives – Mimi Rogers, to whom he was married from 1987-90, or Nicole Kidman, 1990-2001, with whom he adopted Isabella and Connor, now 11 – would mind his being so public about his love for Holmes, 27.
“I mean, look, they’re ex-wives,” he reasons, adding: “But the happiness I’m feeling, that’s absolutely what I wish for them. I really do.”
He also said that “After I began dating Kate, Bella looked at me and said, ‘Don’t let this one go. She’s the one,’” So obviously the kids are very happy with Katie Holmes
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:41 am
Lilianne, Tom hasn’t said anything and this is only gossip plus what they said was “”Although none of Nicole’s revelations portray Tom in a bad light, he’s said to be concerned she may upset their kids, Isabella, 14, and Connor, 12.
“From the minute Tom and I were married, I wanted to have babies,” says Nicole. “And we lost a baby very early on, so that was really very traumatic. That’s when it came that we would adopt Bella.”"
I’ve a feeling Tom will be asked about this now that Nicole started opening up about their lives together but I don’t think he will be talking about it for the sake of his children with Nicole.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:45 am
joj0f7, I can name at least one family that is more exposed than Tom Katie and their kids.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 10:51 am
LIB said: the knocks he’s taken in the past two years alone, and the attempts at damage control (which have failed miserably).
Are you for real? and you have said in the past you either worked or know ppl in the entertainment business and you think his image control in the part year has failed? lol
No wonder ppl don’t take you seriously!!!
And stop with the statement its well known in the Biz line already.
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:01 am
Hana..since you addressed me directly I will do the same. I realize that the statements in question are, at this point, gossip and unproven. If you read my post carefully, you will realize that I said “if this is true”…then it is my opinon that he needs counseling for control issues. You mentioned also that Tom supposedly expressed concern for how Nicole’s article could affect his children. I am sorry but if that is also true then I agree with what someone else said about double standards. I don’t feel that Tom has much right to complain about how his children might feel about their mothers actions when he has behaved the way he has. I feel Nicole has been far more private and concerned for her children than he has.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:07 am
Lilianne, “you mentioned also that Tom supposedly expressed concern for how Nicole’s article could affect his children.”
I didn’t mention this, it was a quote from the gossip Leora posted above.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:09 am
Hana, I’m NOT going to argue with you about this……pull your head out once and for all……everyone in the UNIVERSE has seen tc’s popularity take a toboggan ride down from A-list to C list in the past two years….you’re only making a complete fool of yourself by denying that……..why don’t you just refer to ONE source………the fans precious Forbes List……..he’s behind ELTON JOHN
nuff said
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:15 am
All I’m saying is that, his image has changed since he got married, started running a studio and kept a lower profile. Non of the tabs have written anything nagetive about him in the last few months and yes we don’t have to argue over this now, we’ll know this for a fact when his movie is release November 9.
News
Germany reverses Tom Cruise ban
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6995483.stm
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:16 am
I stand corrected. Sorry for making it seem like I thought you had said that. Just so we are clear I realized that that quote did not come directly from you.
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:23 am
Thank you Lilianne..If Tom is upset with Nicole, he needs to think about his behavior these past few years. Maybe Nicole just wants to let her hair down alittle. I don’t think she went over board in her statements. She talks aout the rough time she had when she was lonely. The way her divorce went with Tom, drug her down and she hit bottom. She talks about how she got out of the rut and how her new hubby make her life complete. About having a baby right now, since she hasn’t been pregnant with Tom baby in the past, she knows that she maynot be able to have a baby and maybe her hubby makes her feel special when he says that he wants just her for a few years. But, the kids were at a concert of his without Nicole in LA. So he has too accepted Nicole kids just like Katie did. But Nicole is more private with her personal life than Tom. Tom has double standards. How is Tom going to feel when his daughter is plasterd all over the gossip columns and she moves in with her boyfriend has a baby before she gets married. I think he might be alittle upset.
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:24 am
I’m sorry but I just have to say this…Hana…I appreciate your loyalty to TC as his fan. But I don’t think that he will ever be able to achieve again the status he once had at the Hollywood box office. It probably has something to do with his script choices, his couch jumping antics, his religious beliefs and his finger-pointing interviews (with Matt Lauer). I can’t speak for others, of course, but this is what I think.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:26 am
Hana, seriously, you should stop embarrassing yourself, his popularity has plummeted since he jumped on Oprahs couch and shot himself in the foot with that Today Show interview!!!
There has been NOTHING but controversy surrounding this union from the beginning, and it hasn’t stopped!!!
and if the Venice Film festival is one of the earliest predictors for upcoming Oscars…..where does that leave Lions?????????
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:30 am
Lilianne, you have it right. I thought that Tom was a great guy until he started acting up. My son discribes him as a man with hormonal problems. hahaha when it came to Katie. And his pushy attitute about his belief, the talk on medicine and Brooke Shields. His behavior with Oprah was very immature
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:30 am
Lib…as much as it pains me to agree with you…I agree with you. But I do think that his popularity took a dip before his appearance on Oprah. I think a lot of his former fans were upset right after he and Nicole split up because of how that all seemed to be handled at the time. And I don’t think he has ever really recovered from that. I think that at best he is tolerated by people and at worst people think he is a fruitcake.
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:34 am
joj…I know what you mean. I was a pretty big TC fan once upon a time. A lot of his biggest movies came out when I was in highschool…Top Gun, etc., and I had my share of posters. I even liked him and his movies up into adulthood…Mission Impossible and The Firm…but I lost a lot of respect for him after his divorce from NK. I just don’t think she was treated very kindly by him.
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:39 am
lilianne, I agree with the Nicole situation. Plus , if you read the article she’s in. The person doing the interview is putting words down also. I think that Nicole did a great job. She still doesn’t say why they divored. It was said in aanother article that his people contacted her people when he filed for the divorce. It was brought up on the Oprah show and Nicole said that it was true but wouldn’t go into more details. I think there was a agreement that it had to stay quiet.
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:44 am
joj…you are are probably right about an agreement. I think celebrities try to be very careful about anything that might portray them in a negative light. And it doesn’t really look good if TC didn’t even tell Nicole about his wishes himself but left it to his “people”. That is weird to me. And a little cowardly if it is really true.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:46 am
Oscars? doesn’t guarantee box office! Actually it does the opposite sometimes. Plus non of the highly Oscars anticipated movies like, The Kite Runner, Reservation Road, Charlie Wilson’s War and so on were NOT shown at Venice Film festival.
Lilianne, I respect that its your opinion but if you check Tom Cruise’s boxoffice records http://boxofficemojo.com/people/chart/?view=Actor&id=tomcruise.htm his non-blockbuster movies only make just over $100m so its my opinion in the future his movies will make the same so I think it will be the same if not more. Don’t forget he has a die hard fans who actually went and saw M:I 3 at a time where most ppl where boycotting it and managed to make $400m world wide and that compared with the other blockbuster movies that came out this year like Die Hard 4, Ocean 13, Fantastic four, Rush Hour 3 and etc. did not make what M:I 3 made both domestic and overseas.
Plus whether you like him or not his chooses good scripts and his movies are either very good or entertaining.
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 11:52 am
Hana…I respect your opinon also. I will take your word for TC’s box office records and not go to the link. I still stand by what I said which is that he will never again achieve the status he once had. I bet if you were to compare his box office records at the beginning of his career when he was at his most popular to what he achieves now then the numbers would be dramatically lower. I might be wrong and I don’t care enough about it to actually check…but I still stand by what I said. And that is once again…he will not be able to ever be as popular as he was…ever again. His time in the sun is over.
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:00 pm
Hana, He is a great actor and I might go see some of his movies. Not to see him but others in the movie. He has no respect for some people. He has pushed sciencetology around for awhile. He treated Brooke Shields and others poorly. Even though he apologize, which was said to be Katie pushing for Brooke. He has exploted his relationship with Katie in the most Man Hormonal way. He was proud he knocked her up, he was like a teenager out of control. He’s still a great actor. Acting is one thing, reality is another. He wasn’t fair to Nicole and he wasn’t fair toanyone how he acted around Katie. Yes, his daughter loves having Katie around. They are very close in age.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:04 pm
Well, since we’re talking about his action in 2005 affecting his work now we can compare his work before that date but comparing his box office records at the beginning of his career when he was at his most popular which is TOP GUN to what he achieves now then the numbers are up and down and not relevant since he didn’t jump on Oprah couch before 2005. Whatever the case We’ll soon find out in November when his movie is release world wide.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:07 pm
jojof7, Nicole herself has said he has always been good to her and she still loves him so the rest is gossip and we don’t know what happened between them.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:08 pm
How many ppl here have seen MI3?
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:09 pm
Hana….I don’t think that TC’s drop in popularity started right after his Oprah interview in 2005. I think it started before that. Of course, the Oprah thing didn’t help and his PDA’s with Katie didn’t help and his religious beliefs didn’t help. I do think he is a great actor. But that doesn’t make him a great person. They are different things. I hope his movie does do well. I don’t wish bad things for him.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:12 pm
I heard that when he met Nicole and they became friends, then he found out she was pregnant and in a bad situation, he called his then wife and said “I’m with Nicole now”. He wanted an easy way out of a marriage where he was being pressured to be a husband ….in the biblical sense…..and ONCE again pretended that someone elses kid was his. Then she mis-carried. Only when Nicole became pregnant again towards the end of their contract with yet another mans baby he walked out on her……NOT the actions of a man whose wife of 10 years is expecting “his” first biological child, don’t you agree????
What Hana is omitting is that Domestically, MI3 only grossed $133,501,348, that didn’t even cover the production budget of 150. Which proves my point that his fan base in the U.S is DEAD. I guarantee you, every fan on this site and others does NOT reside in the U.S……ICEAGE, you know the cartoon, grossed domestically $195,330,621 and $647,330,621 total…so…….
Lilianne
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:12 pm
Hana..to answer your question…I didn’t see MI3. Well, I could stay and debate this issue all day but I will not. Have a nice evening everyone.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:22 pm
Lillanne, that is news to me. Beofre his interview in 2005 he was private and hardly made any headlines and the media speculated that his divorce and relationship with Pen will hurt his popularity but that didn’t happen. Here is a quote from his bography at IMDB i”nstead of his affair with Penélope Cruz damaging both their careers, it only boosted it.”
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/bio
Right now I can only go with his box office numbers which shows his popularity by the number of audiences that see his movies and all actors have up and down over the years.
More on that from IMDB
“Was named the #1 top money-making star at the box office in Quigley Publications annual poll of movie exhibitors a record seven times between 1986 and 2005. Being crowned the top box office champ in 2005 put Cruise one title ahead of Tom Hanks, who has been named #1 at the B.O. six times.”
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:27 pm
Hanna, Put a lid on it!!! Why did he treat Nicole the way he did and divorce her the way he did??So he can come across as a good actor. He’s been acting like a big AXX when he met Katie and he still can act like one now. He showed alot of disrespect, that is what Lillanne is trying to say. We don’t know if Tom has said these things about the article. If he did, he needs to think about his behaviior also.
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:45 pm
Lib, you’re unbelievable. First of all I didn’t even finish reading your comment what a nonsense. Why would you make up stories that are hurtful about someone you don’t know? last year at babyrazzi you didn’t even believe us when we said there was a rumor Nicole had a miscarriage in 1990 and it might be her with problem carrying a child to term but now she admitted it you have to go and make up story to say its not Tom’s child. You must think ppl are idiots and will take you words with ridiculous theories that you make up but you carry it with the line I “heard”…
You know what I’m done having a discussion with someone like you Lib, never again!
Joj0f7 I was just going to say it was nice chatting to you and Lilianne, but just saw your last post. I think just like some of you here I was having a polite discussion and since the discussion was turning about his popularity in the box office I thought I wasn’t out of line. Anyhow before I go I’ll answer your comment, Tom Cruise hasn’t said anything for over a year he has made mistakes and its time you and everyone else get over it. He is only human and we don’t know how he treated Nicole or why they divorced since they both have been private. And its a free world and he is entitle to act in anyway he want to express his love for Katie Holmes and his children.
Have a nice evening all!
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:46 pm
Lib, you’re unbelievable. First of all I did’t even finish reading your comment what a nonsense. Why would you make up stories that are hurtful about someone you don’t know? last year at babyrazzi you didn’t even believe us when we said there was a rumor Nicole had a miscarriage in 1990 and it might be her with problem carrying a child to term but now she admitted it you have to go and make up story to say its not Tom’s child. You must think ppl are idiots and will take you words with ridiculous theories that you make up but you carry it with the line I “heard”…
You know what I’m done having a discussion with someone like you Lib, never again!
Hana
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Joj0f7, I was just going to say it was nice chatting to you and Lilianne, but just saw your last post. I think just like some of you here I was having a polite discussion and since the discussion was turning about his popularity in the box office I thought I wasn’t out of line. Anyhow before I go I’ll answer your comment politly, Tom Cruise hasn’t said anything for over a year he has made mistakes and its time you and everyone else get over it. He is only human and we don’t know how he treated Nicole or why they divorced since they both have been private. And its a free world and he is entitle to act in anyway he want to express his love for Katie Holmes and his children.
Have a nice evening all!
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:55 pm
HANNA, SORRY TO OFFEND YOU. yOU WEREN’T RESPECTING HOW WE FELT. yOU KEPT COMING BACK AT US WITH COMMENTS. DO YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE LAST WORD ALL THE TIME. I MEANT TO PUT A LID ON IT BECAUSE YOU JUST KEPT GOING ON AND ON YOUR RIGHT AND WE DON’T KNOW WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT. DON’T BELIEVE THE TABLODS..
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 12:57 pm
poor hana! I’m not making s h i t up hana, I don’t have to!!!!! I heard about the fact that the first pregnancy was with someone else a couple months back when I went to visit friends in L.A!!!
He’s the most outrageous, ridiculed celeb of the 21st century!!!
Jacks
Sep 14, 2007 at 2:32 pm
Hana good point on Libra and her “facts”. Libra, how do your friends have this information? LA is a big city. Are we supposed to believe that you are one of the privileged few to have this information? I’ll be expecting your usual temper tantrum response.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 2:36 pm
I worked in entertainment law for almost a decade and almost all of my friends still do down there. A very good friend of mine worked at CAA, she confirmed the fact that tc & nk did indeed have a contract marriage, it was business…..not a new concept in the business, not by a long shot
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 2:38 pm
and a legal secretary at my old firm went to high school with Kidman….she preferred the ladies in high school, and even I saw her making out with a woman at a dive bar down the street from my house in WeHo when she was married to tc……BELIEVE me, Hollywood is VERY small
joj0f7
Sep 14, 2007 at 3:07 pm
libraesque, what is a contract marriage?? And does Tom and Katie have one?? That would explain their odd behaver.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 3:30 pm
each party brings to the table whatever it is that they have to give that would benefit the other party, and then they come to an agreement (or not) on various terms and conditions.
ANd I would say YES most definitely history repeated itself with Holmes
Carla
Sep 14, 2007 at 3:34 pm
To answer ANON’s question, which is a good one:
BIG QUESTION FOR ALL YOU FANS: Would Tom had really married or still be with KH if she had not had Suri?
I think that the fact that she was already pregnant when he met her, was the reason he chose her over his other prime candidates. She wanted to make sure that she got the good end of the deal, that’s why her lawyer daddy made sure that she and suri are well-taken care of, financially, thus a contract was negotiated and signed. The kid looks nothing like him. It’s not his kid. She may have his legal name, if Cruise is a legal name, then maybe it’s not. Then everybody is dooped. The kid should be named Suri Malpother, not Cruise.
Libraesque2007
Sep 14, 2007 at 4:00 pm
I think he actually legally changed his name, theres some mystery surrounding the 1st tom mapother, who was born thomas o’mara.
whatever.
the kid isn’t his. the word around town is that katie didn’t know she was pregnant when they first got together. that jumping on the couch……..cruise was ecstatic that he hit the jackpot…….not only did he have a pretty young beard, but a pregnant one….what with yet ANOTHER nasty gay romp ready to explode in the media, he figured this would prove once and for all that he was “hetero” He didn’t bank on it backfiring and basically the entire world not believing a word of it from day one.
His arrogance is his downfall
Dancer
Sep 14, 2007 at 6:20 pm
I didn’t read all of the posts above but I will say that I sympathize with Nicole. I too lost a baby at 4 months pregnant. It nearly destroyed me. I went on to adopt a daughter from Russia. I think losing my baby did force me to go and adopt but not in the way some of you think. It’s a sadness you can’t relate to unless it’s happened to you personally. My daughter was my saviour. I love her deeply.
nguzman
Sep 15, 2007 at 10:14 am
Personally, I think most Hollywood actors & actresses are a bit egotistic, you would have to be because image is a big part of it. I have nothing against Nicole, Tom, or Katie but I think that maybe Nicole is feeling bad or envious because Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, and Suri are a hot ticket as far as photographing them and splashing them on People magazine and the rest of the rags. I have been reading Hollywood entertainment for years and you can see celebrities become famous and then “not.” Before Nicole married Tom Cruise she was not a well known actress. After she married Tom not only did she begin to get better roles her physical appearance changed dramatically, fashion designers clammered at getting her to wear their rags on the red carpet, etc. I think all of that makes celebrities more egotistic, it would be very difficult to avoid that. Only a wise person would know that fame is fleeting.
Now they are divorced and and she probably sees pictures of Tom Cruise with his new wife and beautiful child and it must hurt because once all that attention was directed at her. Today she is married to Keith Urban who struggles to stay clean and somber and that must be very hard for her. She probably didn’t know when she married him she was signing up to be gatekeeper and so I think all of that must be tough for her especially when it appears in newsprint. If you look inside the current issue of Vanity Fair, Nicole is photographed with her sister’s baby in the SAME POSE like Tom Cruise was photographed with Suri (in his jacket) when Suri made her debut in Vanity Fair. Is that a coincidene? I think it is a subliminal message to
Tom Cruise “this is what you denied me.” And you can’t really blame Tom Cruise, Nicole also
signed up to be married to him. If in fact Nicole
was his beard, she fell into the same trap like Kelly Klein (Calvin Klein’s ex-wife) who married him in her 30’s and finally divorced him in her late 40’s. She is now 50 and having a baby via a surrogate mother but she can never talk about her marriage to Calvin Klein. If all of this is true then I guess money, name recognition, fame was too intoxicating to resist.
nguzman
Sep 15, 2007 at 10:31 am
If you consistantly read these type of celebrity magazines you begin to “pick up” on the fact that the article (Vanity Fair) was written to provoke or interest readers to get a diaglogue going on about Nicole and Tom Cruise (even though their story ended six years ago). But right now Tom Cruise is interesting again because of Suri Cruise. Right now pictures of Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, and Suri are big money. All of Nicole Kidman’s last 4 movies (and I am not including the animated one) have flopped. I think this article/interview was a lame attempt to jump on the Tom/Kat and Suri bandwagon and draw attention to Nicole. If that’s the case, it’s a sad and desperate attempt to get attention. I don’t feel sorry for any of these people. They all made a lot of $$$
and can afford a good quality of living. But they can’t buy fame (look at Britney Spears, Lindsey Lohan, Paris Hilton, etc. ), all wealthy women that PRETEND the don’t like being photographed but there they are right in front of the papparazzi at Koi, Sole ll, Chautea Marmont, the Ivy, ety, desperately needing the adoration and attention.
Carla
Sep 15, 2007 at 1:53 pm
Nicole has nothing to worry about. SHe is a beautiful woman and is still acting in many films. Katie’s claim to fame is the daughter that Tom claimed as his. I’ll bet that she won’t (can’t) become pregnant again, as long as she is married to him.
2008Leonine
Sep 17, 2007 at 11:19 am
If this child (Suri) is indeed TC’s, she was conceived with a turkey baster. TC is gayer than a two-dollar bill, so say friends in Hell-ay (No I don’t have anything against gays, just hypocritical ones that claim to be straight to salvage their careers)
I’d love to hear Nicole do a tell all. Has anyone ever heard P. Cruz dish on this stuff?
Libraesque2007
Sep 17, 2007 at 2:58 pm
None of them will ever do a tell all. tom cruise could buy a small country, believe me , he’s bought the silence of everyone around him
Libraesque2007
Sep 17, 2007 at 3:00 pm
It is interesting that tom was such a mega star and the media didn’t even report on their break up for 4 months………and they were “together” from 2001-2004…..
Carla
Sep 17, 2007 at 3:12 pm
If katie isn’t getting any from her husband Tom, I sure hope she’s getting it from someone else, and not wasting her good, young years away, for the sake of money.
Cali-lily
Sep 18, 2007 at 5:36 pm
Hana is obviously a CO$ puppet, they love to post links to “good” pr. Don’t let her ranting and raving get you as she is paid to put that bull out there.
ps. don’t you think that Suri looks more and more like her real daddy, Josh Hartnett?
Tom Cruise Angry At Kidman Over Vanity Fair Interview : Celebrity News Corner
Sep 20, 2007 at 2:23 pm
[…] Agent Bedhead wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt […]
Carla
Sep 26, 2007 at 7:10 am
One of the magazines should outpay Tom’s bribe to Nicole. Can you imagine how much money they would recoup with her spilling the beans on the truth about Tom and his beards? Priceless!
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: