Suri Cruise Walks in the Park With Katie Holmes
Check out these adorable new pictures of Suri Cruise walking in the park with mom Katie Holmes
Via Celeb Utopia Tags: katie holmes, suri cruise, park, berlin
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Katie Holmes, Katie Holmes Pictures, Suri Cruise, Suri Cruise Pictures, TomKat Baby, TomKat Pictures







76 opinions for Suri Cruise Walks in the Park With Katie Holmes
Carla
Oct 15, 2007 at 6:35 pm
So. the almost 2 year old still sucks on her baby bottles. Iguess that’s one for now, and one for later.
Carla
Oct 15, 2007 at 6:44 pm
Libraesque:
What’s this with the kid always having to keep busy with her hands? If she isn’t holding something in them, like a toy or milk bottle, or magic marker, she has to place them behind her head. Fidgity. I wonder wat she does with them under her blanket.
mynameal
Oct 16, 2007 at 6:22 am
leave the kid alone she is a baby and you are sick to think any thing else
Lilianne
Oct 16, 2007 at 6:49 am
I believe that Suri is 18 months…not really “almost” 2 and while it might be strange to some that she is still taking a bottle it isn’t necessarily unheard of. I have heard of some children “nursing” until they are past 2 and so I don’t see how a child taking a bottle at that age is much different. I know of a lot of children who still suck on pacifiers until they are past age 4. As far as Suri keeping her hands busy well…she is a little child. Kids that age and even older are always touching things and putting them in their mouths. It is how they learn about the world. Their language skills aren’t well developed and so exploring things tactically is how they learn. I personally don’t think it is appropriate to imply that something is wrong with Suri because she holds things. And it is certainly kind of creepy to insinuate that she might be doing inappropriate things “under her blanket”. How is Suri holding a bottle or a toy or a magic marker any different that Shiloh JP holding scotch tape or a blanket or a doll or Violet Affleck holding a toy or a blanket or a doll? They are children and this behavior is entirely typical and acceptable.
mynameal
Oct 16, 2007 at 7:18 am
AMEN LILANNE THANK YOU PEOPLE NEED TO GROW UP ON THIS SITE FOR SURE .
smartgurl23
Oct 16, 2007 at 8:14 am
Carla
They got you
Carla
Oct 16, 2007 at 9:45 am
Well. I guess I was a little harsh.
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 9:55 am
okay I’m not going to get into the whole bottle argument again because it’s ludicrous….no kid should be on the bottle at this age, PERIOD.
My problem with this whole scene is that they appear to just be standing around…having their picture taken at a park, theres no playing….no interacting with Suri, but she is sure aware of the cameras on her…it’s PATHETIC….every other celebrity family you see out and about is interacting with their kids…..these people look like extras on a movie set that are waiting for their scene!!!!
Carla
Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04 am
The kid either gets carried or walks. Why don’t they have a stroller, that they can push her in, or give her tricycle to ride.
Lilianne
Oct 16, 2007 at 10:22 am
I wasn’t asking for anyone to get into any kind of argument with me. I just do not think it is ok for anyone to decide what is acceptable behavior regarding child rearing. Just because one person thinks something is wrong (i.e. an 18 month old being on a bottle) doesn’t make it wrong. I think it is especially easy for people who have never been a parent to make generalizations like that. I don’t understand what makes anyone think they have the right to decide what is right and wrong for anyone else. I am a parent and just because both of my children weaned by about 13 months of age doesn’t make it wrong for an 18 month old to still be taking a bottle. I’m not going to go on and on either about the subject of how long a child should take a bottle. I just really get tired of some of the stuff said here. I try to be reasonable and logical but sometimes it feels like I am beating my head up against a brick will and I don’t know why I even bother.
I also don’t know how anyone can assume that all these people are doing is standing around based upon 6 pictures. How do we know that they weren’t running or laughing or playing or interacting? And of course Suri is aware that there are cameras! She can see them can’t she? Just like the JP kids are aware of cameras because they are always in their face. Just like ALL celebrities have to deal with this to some degree. If they ignore the cameras then they are stuck up or full of themselves or they have something to hide and if they look at them or smile or say anything then they are media w h o r e s. How do they win?
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 10:44 am
lili, I don’t need to have children to be able to READ, and a 22 month old, which is what I BELIEVE suri is, should not by any stretch of the imagination be taking a bottle with milk!!!!! Every single thing I’ve read on the subject says this is not right.
What we do on these sites is make comments opn what we see. I guess it’s just one BIG conspiracy against this family that for months they have been photographed standing around empty fields with the kid dressed in Burberry and katie in high heels, zooming through a zoo for another photo op, and now these photos…all of them just standing around, with suri looking like she’s trying to amuse HERSELF.
you shouldn’t feel like you’re beating your head against anything….it’s REALLY not that serious
Lilianne
Oct 16, 2007 at 10:54 am
Libra, I am familiar with how this site works as far as making comments based upon what we see. I also know that everyone has different opinions and that people will not always agree. What frustrates me (my beating my head against a wall comment) is when people act like their opinion is the only one and that everyone else is wrong to have theirs. Just because you believe SC to be 22 months old does not mean that she is. Just like I might not be right in thinking she is exactly the age her parents say she is. Why should it be unreasonable for us to take another look at something and perhaps decide that maybe someone else does make a good point and that perhaps there is more than one side to things? I do think it is safe to say that we (as in you and I) have very different ideas about most subjects but that does not mean I don’t respect your opinion even though I usually don’t agree with it…I always try to keep an open mind because I know I am not always right.
mynameal
Oct 16, 2007 at 11:04 am
HOLY CRAP PEOPLE LEAVE THE KID ALONE SHE IS JUST FINE.
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 11:09 am
LILI, I AGREE!!!!
I’m a Libra and I’m also in the legal profession, I will leave you to draw your own conclusions on that.
I’m feelin the love with you and appreciate our ability to disagree….please don’t take it personally when I get 3 kinds of opinionated, and I’ll try to do what doesn’t come naturally online for me….I will try to censor myself a little “around” you because I can see you’re sensitive, and that’s a good thing
joj0f7
Oct 16, 2007 at 11:10 am
Yes Suri is a little to old for a bottle. Most Dr.s says 1. Maybe she is still on a bottle for security. She’s not in her own enviroment. She needs to hang on something and she has her blanket also. Kids can have a blanket for years. Imagine being Suri and everyone talks German except her family. I’m surprise that Tom’s kids haven’t been there. Give Suri a break, she can’t help what is going on with her life. Her life is controlled by adults. I think it’s a security thing with the bottle. Maybe it’s a little security for Katie also. Give Suri a break…
Lilianne
Oct 16, 2007 at 11:24 am
Libra….thanks a lot for the post. I must tell you that I don’t really draw any conclusions based upon your profession and your sign. I myself am a Leo and am experienced in the childcare field.
I too appreciate our ability to disagree and I really do try not to take things personally. I know that the stuff said here has really nothing to do with ME. I don’t know if being sensitive is a good thing though…..I find it is a real pain in the b u t t sometimes. :-)
Balletmama
Oct 16, 2007 at 11:38 am
At least KH left the heels home. Does TC ever interact with the kid? It says he was leaving the set early to play with Suri.
Also, where are Connor adn Isabella, the non-bios? Will Suri be left home like those two when bio baby number 2 comes?
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 11:44 am
excellent.
it really doesn’t have anything to do with any of us….it doesn’t mean it’s any less entertaining to discuss this family. There really is NO other celebrity family out there that is more bizarre than this one. From the minute they got “together” it has been one strange thing after another….it’s endless and goes on and on almost on a daily basis
joj0f7
Oct 16, 2007 at 12:21 pm
libra is right. Tom and Katie has been in the eye’s of the world. Tom asked for it. They could ask for some privacy like other celebraties have done for their children. Tom acted very fullishly and immature about Katie and this whats happens.
Balletmama
Oct 16, 2007 at 12:56 pm
Didn’t they ask for privacy with Connor and Isabella?
I think the bio kid thing they wanted public. I mean didn’t they make all these “annoucements” when tc had movies coming out. Wasn’t that part of complaint the studio and producers had against TC?
I’m willing to bet preggo #2 will be announced when TC’s movie is released.
smartgurl23
Oct 16, 2007 at 1:14 pm
Mommy and Me Time very nice
joj0f7
Oct 16, 2007 at 1:59 pm
You are right Balletmama, I heard Nicole say that she asked for privvacy of their children. I’ve heard other celebraties ask the same. I really feel sorry for Suri. She didn’t ask for all this publicity. Your probally right about the announcement of their second child. I wonder if he’ll jump up and down. That would be a sight. hahahaha
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 2:31 pm
yes, they did…I think it was a few years before there was a photo of the adopted kids. Nicole abhors any kind of media frenzy and is very protective of her children. Apparently they had an agreement that the children would not attend any premiers…..which TC went back on when he took them to MI3….apparently she was furious
Carla
Oct 16, 2007 at 2:47 pm
That’s because TC doesn’t care about what anyone else thinks, but himself. He will do whatever suits him with katie and the kid, too. Actually, we have already seen that. Remember when Katie was 7 months pregnant and he was taking her all over the globe? Real concerned boyfriend (then) and father, huh?
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 2:55 pm
what about the ICE SKATING on her b-day!!!
WTF!!! who does that??? I think he had absolutely no regard for his pregnant wife or her safety because the kid wasn’t his
And when Suri was a week old he leaves to go promote MI3….!!!! WTFF!!
joj0f7
Oct 16, 2007 at 4:00 pm
Can’t you guys figure it out!!! Tom the studs of all studs..He does things that no man can do !!!Be a dad !! Apparently he acts like he’s the only man that can father a child. I love Katie, but I don’t know about Tom…hehehehe
Libraesque2007
Oct 16, 2007 at 4:49 pm
okay, I just looked at that picture closer…..
H E L L N O!!!! Isn’t that an infant bottle she has…with MILK in it? One of those collapsable ones that newborns use???
THATS CRAZY!!!!!
joj0f7
Oct 16, 2007 at 6:03 pm
Yep !!! 2 botttles and the security guard is carrying a insulated vinyle cooler… It’s not Suri fault, they won’t let her grow up. I still say its used for security.
Balletmama
Oct 16, 2007 at 6:57 pm
Maybe Suir has inherited her mother’s intelligence. KH certainly does not have much activity going on between the ears, unless it is shopping.
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 7:09 am
Maybe the blanket and the bottles are all for show. They make it look like Suri is younger than what others have speculated, to be her real age. I’d rather see the mother using sealed fruit juice box containers, where the child can sip the juice out of a straw, then throw them away.
What?
Oct 17, 2007 at 7:11 am
Suri is retarded, that’s why she is still on the bottle. She can’t swallow real food yet, can’t figure it out. Aliens don’t eat real food on their planet…just drink slime. LOL
mynameal
Oct 17, 2007 at 7:14 am
YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS RETARDED FOR SAYING THAT , SHE IS A BABY AND LEAVE HER ALONE
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 7:19 am
Since they use nurser bottles and not pre-packaged containers, I assume that the milky white liquid is probably home-prepared and self mixed (BYOB). Who knows what’s in that liquid. It could contain vitamins or some drug. It seems like everytime after Suri is pictured holding her bottle, she knocks out, and mommy has to carry her away. I know that kids need plenty of sleep and rest, but this kid always seems to require a lot of napping, especially during their photo ops. I speculated before that this kid doesn’t get much sleep at night, and I am believing that more now.
smartgurl23
Oct 17, 2007 at 9:13 am
Carla
Maybe its just normal bottle because they are a normal celebrity family
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 10:23 am
What is normal about these people? They are jumping all over sofas and getting knocked up within two seconds of meeting each other. They are snoggling each other in public up until KH pops, much to the disgust of everyone around them, and then there is nothing in the way of affection after the kid is born. They hold hands in a weird way. They USE their bio kid for their own PR and ignore the adopted ones. Not to mention TC the psych expert.
Kh can’t possibly be normal, because any normal, mature woman would have run the other way after the sofa thing and the fact that mommy is still living in the home with her son.
Although, I will grant, she is normal for an immature teenage girl who is in love with fame, unlimited shopping, etc.
If they are normal adults, please shoot me now.
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 11:16 am
I’ve been following TC’s career, since Risky Business, and it’s known world wide that he is a soggy fruit loop. Nothing has changed with him. He has always done what he could do, in the name of fame. Notarizing scientology was his and Travolta’s big spiral in the down position. His only hope, after getting rid of Nicole, was to find another victim. He found one. A stupid one, whose thirst for fame and fortune was as large as the mojave desert. The sad part of her stupidity, is using her own child, to keep this celebrity fame.
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 12:10 pm
What is this “beard” position that everyone refers to? I still don’t get why he just does not come out of the closet. Is Scientology not that tolerant?
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 12:13 pm
NExt question: How come no one has come out said anything about these arrangements? I mean TC has “dated” how many people? I don’t think he is that powerful that people can’t say anything!!
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 12:30 pm
I guess I still live in an idelaistic world to believe that there is no one on this earth who could scare, threaten and prevent another from speaking out. Unfortunately, that is not the world we live in, especially, when it comes to money. I believe that everyone has a price, and I also believe that these mongrols not only offer large sums of money, but also demand a contract to be signed by the recipient, that if they ever leak anything, that it would be in exchange for their life.
Libraesque2007
Oct 17, 2007 at 12:37 pm
A beard is someone who poses as a g a y mans girlfriend or in katies case wife.
Most people who come in contact , have ANY kind of involvement with and/or work for celebrities sign confidentiality agreements which prevent them from disclosing ANY information about said celebrity to any media.
Nicole and tc had a contract marriage. A friend of mine worked at CAA and actually saw portions of it. It was a business deal
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 12:40 pm
Balletmama:
When a man grows a beard on his face, it covers his face to the point, where you can’t see his true features and identity. A woman who is called a “beard” does the same thing. She covers his true identity, by pretending to be his significant other in a relationship that really doesn’t exist. Once the man shaves off the beard, his real facial features are revealed.
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 12:51 pm
From what I read, and it could be misinformation, TC and Nicole planned the pregnanices of their two adopted children, with the same woman, who happened to be a scientology member.
smartgurl23
Oct 17, 2007 at 1:11 pm
Carla
Is Nicole a scientology member?
Because her and husband had a catholic wedding
Libraesque2007
Oct 17, 2007 at 1:22 pm
SHES CATHOLIC
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 1:26 pm
From what I read Nicole was/is Catholic. She picked up Scientology at the same time she picked up Cruise. She became concerned in her marriage that Cruise would dump her if Scientology told him to and also she saw it all as crap. She was trying to reconnect to Catholicism when Cruise dumped her and took the kids away from her.
Another Cruise-Kidman connection: If you read about their 2007 weddings, they are very similar. Difference is, Kidman’s husband actually wrote the song he sang to her at the wedding for her. TC and KH were not so original when they sang. Also, Nicole and hubby had a long kiss too. I guess TC and KH were not to be upstaged by Kidman and had to copy quite a bit of Kidman’s and Urban’s wedding ideas.
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 1:29 pm
Although I doubt Kidman will ever wear pillows to fake a pregnancy. KH certainly did when she “wanted to throw the press about how far along she was”. (Talk about maniacal on her part.) I guess TC’s money can only buy so much, including the entire Holmes clan. It is certainly not honesty or integrity.
Libraesque2007
Oct 17, 2007 at 1:30 pm
“you’ve lost that loving feeling” as a wedding song……..BIZAAAAAARE
lemon227
Oct 17, 2007 at 1:46 pm
May not so bizzare because they never had it!
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 2:28 pm
That’s definately not a wedding song, by any stretch of the imagination. They should be singing about finding it, not losing it. I think that the wedding reception was really a big get together that TC wanted for his real sweethearts, and Katie isn’t one of them. Katie just happened to dress up in something white, that was borrowed anyway. They didn’t have to pay for the gown. Like I said, the casualty here is Suri, and possiblity any other innocent beings they bring into their world.
Carla
Oct 17, 2007 at 2:34 pm
If Katie can’t get pregnant with the invitro method, maybe they can bring in a stud to do the job, just like they do with horses.
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Maybe some Scientology lackey will be preggo for KH and Kh will wear the pillows and eat cupcakes.
Also, if she does have another one, hopefully Pitt-Jolie won’t have another at the same time to overshadow them again.
Balletmama
Oct 17, 2007 at 2:57 pm
Is JLo preggo? Is Cruise going to make sure her kid and JLO are drug free too during labor and post-partum? Is Cruise going to take credit for it? LOL!
Carla
Oct 18, 2007 at 5:57 am
Jlo is preggo through the scientology invitro way, with twins. Funny, when Katie was pregnant, I thought that her oversized, out of shape, unudually weird looking belly was the sign of twins. Maybe she had complications during birth. I guess we won’t know the true story, until someone spills the beans.
Carla
Oct 18, 2007 at 5:58 am
that word is unusually.
smartgurl23
Oct 18, 2007 at 7:23 am
Suri looks cute walking in the park
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 9:11 am
Suir is cute. She just has immature idiots for parents.
I thought KH/TC admitted to using a pillow to throw off the press about how far along she was. That would explain the weird belly.
So, is TC taking credit for his new Scientology converts? I thought Marc was definately Catholic and would not change. I guess money has bought another Catholic to Scientology!
Is that the way KH is going–in vitro?
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 9:12 am
uess no anti-depressants for JLo!!! Dr. TC, expert in psychiatry, will make sure of that in the media!!
Libraesque2007
Oct 18, 2007 at 10:14 am
mama, Katie, probably as per her wedding contract, had to share the “wedding” event with a Scientology recruiting blitz. Hundred and hundreds of people she didn’t even know attending her “special day” Why? I think that question is answered when you hear what everyone at every table received as a “gift”…….a gift bag with $cientology paraphinalia…pamphlets, a book and a certificate for a free session and massage/detox.
SO so revolting. They tried REALLY hard to recruit JLo because she’s basically an empire with her hands in mnay pies….a real money making machine. BUT her father is a $cieno and has been for years….she never has, and never will want any part of it, and apparently Marc put his skeleton foot down, he is Catholic to the core, and wears the pants in that family…..just like Posh…….tc tried so hard to schmooze the Beckhams, and we see where that went. Posh isn’t about to part with one red cent of her shopping money and Becks obviously doesn’t have anything in common or want to have anything to do with tc’s crazy
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 12:38 pm
Libra: Thought you might like to know that I took your advice abd changed my user from Anon.
I read something interesting today that will get the Cruise legal in gear. Andrew Morton has apparently written an unauthorized bio of Tom Cruise. It will hit the stands in January. Morton apparently wrote one about Diana and Lewinsky. (I guess that gives the idea of the dirt he is able to write.)
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 12:43 pm
You know what, KH volunteered for all this nonsense, including using herself and Suri for Scientology propaganda. She had to cough up something for her $30 million wedding. I have no sympathy that her party was used in that way. I feel sorry that Suri is used that way and her so-called mom is allowing it.
KH at least got a nice party and credit cards. What does Suri get from the whole deal? Crappy parents!!!
Carla
Oct 18, 2007 at 1:15 pm
Andrew Morton better watch out, that he isn’t found dead somewhere.
smartgurl23
Oct 18, 2007 at 1:34 pm
Balletmama
Plese tell me you don’t believe the nonsense that come out about Tom and Katie
Carla
Oct 18, 2007 at 1:38 pm
smartgurl
What nonsense do you believe about them?
Libraesque2007
Oct 18, 2007 at 2:11 pm
mama, GOOD CHOICE on the screen name I LIKE it!!!!! Can my pet name for you be mamacita?
anyhoo, I’ve been following the Morton thing for awhile and was shocked and horrified to hear that Big Red, the p o r n guy who claims to have had s*e*x with tc DIED in june in a freak water skiing accident. I don’t find the timing a coincidence. And the extortionist turning up dead!!! TWO people with a tc connection dead inside of a couple months? ANd that other couple, the artists who collaborated with Beck “commited suicide” and for years they had said they were being harrassed by the $cienos.
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 2:37 pm
I am finding all of this conspiracy stuff hard to swallow. I believe he uses his money and influence to keep his image clean, but murdering people!!! Is it the Scientology groupies doing this or TC’s cronies? Besides who is TC that they would go this far with him, the next Xenu or reincarnate of L. Ron?
Even the Scientologists have to see that people in and out of Hollywood see TC as a joke. I wonder if they will dump him like Paramount has.
How will silly KH get out of all this with Suri if this is the case? I wonder if she will lose custody of Suri as a result and be kept at a distance like Nicole has been with her two adopted kids. (Although that will be more a money issue, if anything. Even lawyer daddy and brother cannot protect her from this one.)
I always thought KH was silly for not paying much attention to TC’s history: dumping wives at a whim, Nicole kept from her kids, mommy living with him, etc. I also thought she was in it for the money. Suri insured her credit cards.
Libraesque2007
Oct 18, 2007 at 3:21 pm
It truly seems like there may be a new “cleaner” in the higher ranks of $cientology. Theres no way tc is consulted about this stuff, he’s just a puppet…..but it certainly seems as though lately theres someone in charge who is getting rid of obstacles that are in the way of one of their highest money making members. Two incidences where people, in the span of months, who have wanted to come forward with obviously very incriminating evidence against tc, have wound up dead………..it could even be an explaination of why the wedding was actually a recruiting event. PUNISHMENT!!! For being indiscreet and putting his career (and their cash cow) in jeopardy. He’s instructed to use the wedding as a recruiting event OR ELSE (in the event that these people suceed in their efforts to bring him down)
Obviously they didn’t suck in the big players they thought they would (JLo, Beckhams) so they had to go to Plan B.
These people are seriously one step below the mob. And they OWN tc
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 3:37 pm
So, does this filter down to KH and Suri as well? I mean it won’t look good if KH gets dumped and she comes out about Suri or other things.
Is KH that stupid or that greedy to agree to all this silliness?
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 3:46 pm
I still blame Suri’s silly mother and father for all this crap and danger they have put their kid in. Unfortunately KH probably thinks the shopping trips and fashion icon status (which will probably not happen) are worth it. I can’t respect people who do this kind of stuff to their kid. Even without it, I cannot respect either one for selling their kid the way they have. Mark my words, Suri will be shoved aside, like Connor and Isabella, if another kid comes along.
Rather ironic Cruise is portraying someone who tried to bring down a totalitarian regime and go against this kind of Gestapo like regime. (Wasn’t Hitler narcisiitic and power hungry like Cruise? Is KH Cruises Eva Braun, Hitler’s girlfriend.LOL: Now there would be a good script for the two of them.)
I can see now why the guy’s family is insulted by the whole thing. I wonder if they will be swayed by money to show up at the premeire and have their pics with TC and gang.
Libraesque2007
Oct 18, 2007 at 4:13 pm
and hitler was g a y just like tc.
thats precisely why this film will be boycotted. It’s outrageously arrogant for him to play a german hero given the Nazi like cult he belongs to. That footage being destroyed….no accident, believe me.
I think Katie will have no problem when the time comes to leave. Suri is her child biologically, not toms. I’m sure her father oversaw an iron clad prenup, that will protect her. Custody obviously depends on the situation when the divorce happens…but as long as Katie keeps her nose clean she should have no problem walking away with her daughter. I seriously doubt sweet Katie from Dawsons Creek has anything in her auditing sessions that they could bargin with…no way. UNLIKE tc, $cientology OWNS him
I believe tc negotiated the adopted children “away” from nicole because she broke their contract by getting pregnant with someone elses child.
Libraesque2007
Oct 18, 2007 at 4:14 pm
mamacita, one family member was already bought, he sold out for a role in the movie
Balletmama
Oct 18, 2007 at 5:28 pm
Wasn’t it part of the contract saying this kid was TC’S? (I’m still don’t buy that conspiracy.) I mean KH can’t come out later and say she lied. Think about the damage to poor Suri.
If Scient. is that mafia-like, I doubt they will let her a) walk away with the kid from Scient. and b) say it wasn’t TC’s. That would be very embarassing for all involved, including innocent Suri. Much more controversial than wedding photos for extortion.
They may have dirt on her though. I doubt she could lie like this for money and fame and not have something in her past. Or maybe they will blackmail with her family. Even with all the lies she has told to get what she has, no one will respect, believe, or hire her if she comes clean now. She has sold herself and, unfortunately, her daughter.
She’s there until she is traded in for the younger model in a few years. I doubt TC would allow community property laws to set in. Given KH’s lifestyle, $3 million a year and a house will not be enough. I think there will also be a fight for Suri and other kid(s). TC’s ego will not allow KH to walk away with Suri.
Maybe KH is drugged half the time and that will be their way to keep Suri away from her. It worked with Nicole.
Libraesque2007
Oct 18, 2007 at 6:01 pm
she’ll never tell the public about Suri not being his!!!! It’s not to her advantage in ANY way!!! She’d have to admit to the world she sold out to be a beard, and that she used tc just as much as he used her!!!! He used her to head off at the pass the morton/big red excerpt that was going to be leaked, she used him to save face after discovering she was knocked up!!!
Just like Nicoles never going to say “he’s
g a y!!” “he’s sterile, thats why we adopted, that kid isn’t his!” Everyone would know this unknown actress sold her soul to be in a contract marriage with a g a y man for fame and fortune AND that it wasn’t his kid she got pregnant with at the beginning of their relationship, OR the end.
Believe me, her father has made sure there are no loop holes when it comes to their little girl and their grand-daughter. She’ll walk away with the kid, no problem
WheresJoey
Oct 18, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Little Suri looks to be between 18 mns and 2 years to me. I think she is just tall for her age. Katie is tall don’t forget. She looks just like Katie. But I think she does look a little like Tom too. I don’t have any idea about whats going on with them intimately but the kid looks biologically theirs to me.
smartgurl23
Oct 19, 2007 at 7:41 am
Libraesque2007
Quit saying Suri is not Tom’s kid when she looks just like him
If you could think straight for one moment do you think another man would not claim that baby if the baby was he’s
Look every man in the world was claiming Anna Nicole’s baby girl
xkimlewtasx
Oct 20, 2007 at 1:30 pm
i agree with smartgurl
anyway has anyone noticed how Suri seems to be strutting her stuff like mommy, mabie Katies been teaching her to walk like a model only the baby does it better unlesss Katie is aiming for lets all walk like raptors
smartgurl23
Oct 20, 2007 at 3:40 pm
Libraesque2007
Nothing to say about the family
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: