Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

19 opinions for Katie Holmes Short Bangs

• Ana
  Feb 28, 2007 at 11:15 pm

  it has been said that those “bangs” really is hair that grow after Suri was born…when some women had their babies i think the lost hair and this is new hair that is just growing…i don’t remember where i read this, but i did =D

• Entertainus
  Mar 1, 2007 at 10:05 am

  she’s had these bangs since before her wedding, if you look at her wedding pics you’ll notice them. Chances are we haven’t noticed them much because she always has them slicked back.

• Kristin
  Mar 1, 2007 at 11:48 am

  You do grow new hair during pregnancy and after you stop breast feeding you loose a lot of hair. This is only new hair growth. That is why is it longer than it was in her wedding photos.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 1, 2007 at 12:42 pm

  what’s up with the black circles under her eyes???

• angela
  Mar 1, 2007 at 2:49 pm

  Yeah, you can look back from way before the wedding and see that she has had those. New growth. Sometimes, I get that in the same place.

• Ida
  Mar 1, 2007 at 3:25 pm

  Libraesque, if you have not been around, the oscar frenzy has just ended, sorry you missed. Helen Mirren won best Actress in her role in ‘the Queen’and Forrest Whittacker won best Actor in his role as Idi Amin in the ‘last king of scotland’. Katie and Tom attended several pre- oscar and After oscar parties. She also has a 10 month old baby called SURI.

• jodie
  Mar 1, 2007 at 4:24 pm

  i have short hairs that grow like that. i think she is beautiful, but she needs to get away from tom

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 1, 2007 at 5:01 pm

  I haven’t seen photos of anyone else looking all tore up post Oscars, babies or no babies. I guess she’s different in that she can’t be bothered to try to conceal it with make-up if she goes out???????

• Sasha
  Mar 1, 2007 at 5:56 pm

  She needs to get away from Tom. Some of us are tired of hearing that, it is her choice. Why Tom is so bad? because he spoke up about a druggie nation.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 2, 2007 at 11:44 am

  Why Tom is so bad? What the hell kind of grammer is that?
  Anyway, it is NOT appropriate for a movie star to go on national television and criticize the medical community AS WELL AS a fellow actor, spewing out “knowledge” that was written by a psychotic, drugged up sci-fi lunatic.
  He lost a HUGE fan base when he did that, but then, he got exactly what he deserved

• Anna
  Mar 2, 2007 at 4:28 pm

  Aaaaaaaaaaaahhhh Libraesque, guess who has had the last laugh?
  http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20013941,00.html

• Sasha
  Mar 2, 2007 at 5:59 pm

  Library is a teacher on this site. Yes i say it again is he bad man? As far as i am concern ,he has never been to rehab so far for anything, so in my book he is the good guy. And as for the pharmaceutical companies , they are behind all this, since they do not want you to be informed about what is really going on.

• Sasha
  Mar 2, 2007 at 6:01 pm

  Redstone realise plan B is going nowhere and wants plan A asap.

• libraesque
  Mar 2, 2007 at 6:21 pm

  Anna, I don’t get what you’re trying to say, are you saying that TC is having the last laugh because Sumner Redstone says 6 months later….he wants to remain friends???
  That’s not really anything to have the last laugh over is it? It’s not like the guy is saying “I made a mistake, a big mistake, I’m eating crow”

  No, no no. You see, that’s what TC had to say to Brooke Shields, remember????

  Have you forgotten these words, which contradict what this old senile geezer is saying:

  Vanity Fair Interview
  “When did I decide [to fire him]?” Redstone asks. “I don’t know. When he was on the Today show? When he was jumping on a couch at Oprah? He changed his handler, you know, to his sister—not a good idea. His behavior was entirely unacceptable to [my wife,] Paula, and to the rest of the world. He didn’t just turn one [woman] off. He turned off all women, and a lot of men.… He was embarrassing the studio. And he was costing us a lot of money. We felt he cost us $100, $150 million on Mission: Impossible III. It was the best picture of the three, and it did the worst.”

  The deal with Cruise/Wagner Productions was scheduled to lapse at the end of August. Redstone indicates he decided to cut ties to the company sometime last spring, waiting until the July time frame to notify Freston and Paramount’s C.E.O., Brad Grey. “I made my decision without their support; I didn’t tell anyone for months,” Redstone says. “But [eventually] I made my position clear to Tom and Brad, that he should be off the lot. They had some concerns.” In fact, Freston and Grey realized that “firing” an actor with Cruise’s visibility and track record, a highly unusual if not unprecedented move, would trigger a severe backlash in Hollywood’s creative community. Still, it was Redstone’s company, and they were his employees.

  “This wasn’t just Sumner—he had a right to feel the way he did,” says a person involved in Paramount’s deliberations. “I mean, women didn’t go see the movie, because of Tom Cruise’s behavior. It showed up in the research.” Freston and Grey, this person says, had put a lowball bid on the table to renew the contract—$2.5 million, by all accounts—and everyone involved realized that both sides would probably allow the deal to quietly lapse. “The negotiations had started when Sumner weighed in,” this person says. “Brad had to get rid of the offer, which is a hard thing to do. They were working toward that. They understood where Sumner was coming from. They really did. They were trying to pull [the offer] back, and when they were trying to do that, Sumner went public. That’s when everything hit the fan.”

  Redstone characterizes his decision to “go public” as entirely an accident. A savvy Wall Street Journal reporter, Merissa Marr, caught wind of the story and telephoned Redstone at his home, and Redstone told her everything, castigating Cruise for his behavior. Redstone acknowledges his comments were unnecessary, but he brushes aside any suggestion he went public merely to re-assert his role as Viacom’s alpha dog. Still, there’s no denying the sparkle in his eyes as he recounts the reaction to his comments. Clearly, he loved every minute of it.

  “I wasn’t looking for an explosion,” Redstone insists, “but I didn’t mind it. The explosion was good. It sent a message to the rest of the world that the time of the big star getting all this money is over. And it is! I would like to think that what I did, or what we did, has had a salutary effect on the rest of the industry.”

• Iman
  Mar 2, 2007 at 10:31 pm

  Poor Redstone trying to mend fences now, shame on him.After the storm , now he realise his mistakes.

• Ida
  Mar 3, 2007 at 11:04 am

  This is the second time he is putting an olive branch to Cruise, I don’t think he gets it. Cruise is now President of UA and has just concluded a deal with $500 million Merrly Lynch. Now Redstone has realised that Cruise is indeed powerful as Brad Grey had warned him. I think he was jealous of Tom and his popularity and the fact that he refused to kiss his ass. May be Tom already had his plans of UA since he seemed unfased after the sacking.

  Ha Ha ha, am loving this.

  Next time he will think with his head not his balls.

• Anna
  Mar 3, 2007 at 11:07 am

  Libraesque, grasping at straws is not good, you end up shooting yourself instead.

  I hope Tom tells Redstone to shove his ill wrapped apologies down his a-hole.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 5, 2007 at 12:00 pm

  UH! You people are pathetic. Did you read the Vanity Fair article I posted, I don’t think so. This man is beyond senile. The person who interviewed him said he was fragile and incoherant. I wouldn’t be doing a little happy dance about this delusional old man saying he wants to be friends with TC

• Katie Holmes Short Bangs | D*ana’s Dirt
  Apr 9, 2007 at 5:53 pm

  […] TomKatCrazy… what do you think of her […]

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Celebrities
• Entertainment
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture
• Video Games