b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Celebrities Channel

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

Katie Holmes Shopping with Victoria Beckham at H Lorenzo

by leora on April 30th, 2007

Victoria Beckham and Katie Holmes Shopping

Check out these pictures of Katie Holmes shopping with Victoria Beckham at H Lorenzo in Hollywood:

Victoria Beckham and Katie Holmes Shopping

Via Celeb Utopia Tags: tomkat, katie holmes, tom cruise, victoria beckham, shopping

nik
Apr 30, 2007 at 10:24 am

Posh looks a healthy weight!
Elliott
Apr 30, 2007 at 11:49 am

Katie looks so adorable. The shoes of Posh is the same one Katie used for the Bazaar magazine Posh styled her outfits.
Tia
Apr 30, 2007 at 11:53 am

Katie is dressed appropriately for shopping and as usual posh is over dressed.
amy
Apr 30, 2007 at 12:04 pm

posh & becks = tom cruise approved friends for katie to play with…
i find this pairing very odd…
Trooper
Apr 30, 2007 at 12:07 pm

Yay New Katie pics! I like Katie’s style, its just comfortable and not too out there!
Jenna
Apr 30, 2007 at 12:08 pm

I love Katie Holmes, but why does she have to be friends with Victoria Beckham? Ick…and I hate the vest…it doesn’t show her sexy figure at all
Anne
Apr 30, 2007 at 12:54 pm

Katie looks cuuuuuute in that out fit. Victoria is over dressed but she would not be Victoria if she wasn’t LOL.
Sarah
Apr 30, 2007 at 2:15 pm

I like Katies outfit,And Victoria’s is very pretty also!!
libraesque
Apr 30, 2007 at 2:19 pm

this is just BEYOND odd. Isn’t Posh embarrassed? Image is clearly everything to her, and she’s hanging out with someone in baggy jeans a cheap white t-shirt, ugly vest and very sloppy hair

Does she do that to Katie to feel better about herself? Why wouldn’t Katie have changed? Normal best friends change when one is WAY under-dressed
Tia
Apr 30, 2007 at 2:23 pm

I agree posh should have under dressed…after all this was just a shopping trip and not the red carpet but posh is posh for a reason.
Tia
Apr 30, 2007 at 2:24 pm

How can she shop with those shoes??!!
amy
Apr 30, 2007 at 3:04 pm

how can she do ANYTHING in those shoes??

i think its good that katie has a friend who is young and also a (sometimes) working mother and a non scieno…i don’t suppose she is around that many people on a regular basis like that…

but i just find them an odd pair…wonder if katie can be the one to finally get posh to crack a smile…??
how odd…one who is famous for NOT smiling and the other who is famous for her ‘wonky’ smile…
Jenna
Apr 30, 2007 at 4:40 pm

I agree with the other posts, Posh is over dressed for a shopping trip, but at least now she seems to have gained some much needed weight. Finally, she looks healthy and not like an x-ray!!!
Jenna
Apr 30, 2007 at 4:41 pm

PS. There is another Jenna post ….. I guess we have two Jenna’s :)
Kay
Apr 30, 2007 at 5:26 pm

Katie looks like trash. Doesn’t she have any decent clothes? Posh looks very attractive for once.
Kristi
Apr 30, 2007 at 7:24 pm

Posh looks over-done….those shoes are soooo ugly…Katie looks more reasonable. I like these two as friends….Katie doesn’t care if Posh takes the spotlight and Posh wants the spotlight…perfect match!!!
Sasha
May 1, 2007 at 6:15 am

Us weekly said Tom ask her not to go shopping. What she is doing ? lies, lies again.
Sasha
May 1, 2007 at 7:05 am

Those shoes look exactly like the ones Katie wore for her photo shoot in harper’s bazaar.
Sasha
May 1, 2007 at 7:06 am

I am talking about Victoria’s shoes.
Tia
May 1, 2007 at 7:40 am

you’re right Victoria’s shoes are the same as the one Katie wore for the magazine shoot.
[url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/people/chart/?id=tomcruise.htm][color]!!!![/color][/url]
May 1, 2007 at 8:42 am

I wish posh stops trying so hard.
Anon.
May 1, 2007 at 9:06 am

We can all see why Katie married Tom Cruise….unlimited shopping money!!! I thought she was supposed to be working on a new movie in Lousianna. Does she jet home every night to shop and eat at expensive restaurants?
For Katie, it was love at first paycheck…Tom Cruise’s paychecks!!
Anne
May 1, 2007 at 9:11 am

Anon, thank you very much for the info. It is her life and if pay checks turn her on, good on her.I guess your kicks come out of hating those who are happier than you. Get a life.
Reendog
May 1, 2007 at 9:33 am

Posh normal weight? Here come the pregnancy rumors again!
Carla
May 1, 2007 at 11:04 am

Anon:

It does stand to reason that KH was engaged to Chirs Klein for 5 years and obviously he wasn’t good enough for her. I mean, why stop at mediocre when you can have it all! SHe really went from nothing to the top. I think she jets back to LA on the weekends, but remains in Shreveport during the week. It’s obvious that she craves the attention. And as for the cart blanche shopping sprees, well, that’s the price TC has to pay to keep his gold digging woman happy. SHe wouldn’t settle for anything less. I was a little shocked to hear that she walked her little gold digger ass in a Target store. What shame! I guess that’s where she bought that ugly, mismatched, ridiculous wrapping paper for Grier’s birthday gifts.
amy
May 1, 2007 at 11:53 am

hi carla…!! - did you know that you and i are apparently the same poster??….

i always thought your comments were intelligent and witty - and now i know why..it is because I wrote them…
and anne…you really do have to stop calling anyone who has a different opinion to you a ‘hater’ thats a bit harsh isn’t it??
diddlysquat
May 1, 2007 at 1:18 pm

i think katie looks like a hobo here the girl is just a wanna be
she married into money and hollywood A list and thinks that by hanging onto her husbands coat tails she will be a somebody
not in this lifetime ‘joey’
posh is only using you to get a high profile here
tom is only using you for your uterus
you are a joke
even to your own parents
all you are good for is shopping
now go and buy a personality
Miapocca
May 1, 2007 at 1:22 pm

Anne you are being very bold in attacking people

do you want me to come back and give you a taste of your own medicine??/
~*maria*~
May 1, 2007 at 1:29 pm

this is not a real friendship tom has paid for posh to babysit and spy on katie
tom will soon hate posh though because she will refuse to join his money sucking cult as she is a big shopper and needs her money for shoes and boobs then poor katie will be alone again just tom his mommy the sisters and the nannies
she won’t last half the distance of nicole
tom will destroy katie in the next year or so you wait and see
Sasha
May 1, 2007 at 1:35 pm

I wish i could shop like that too.
fiona
May 1, 2007 at 2:28 pm

quelle intelligence dans se topic il y a vraiment des personnes qui devrait aller jeter leur venin ailleur
SI vous n’aimez pas katie ou tom alors allez ailleurs bande de naze
non bande de con
au faite VIVE la france
Sasha
May 1, 2007 at 4:59 pm

It’s Tom money, if he wants her to spend it , why should we have a problem with that. Jealous people can not see clearly. Oui Fiona c’est comme ca ils n’aiment pas ce couple, mais c’est la jalousie qui parle. Beaucoup d’entre eux aimeraient etre a la place de Katie.
LIBRAESQUE
May 1, 2007 at 6:01 pm

DON’T CRY Y’ALL!!!!

from Newsweek

For almost as long as there have been power lists, Tom Hanks and Tom Cruise—”The Toms”—have jockeyed for first position, occasionally letting Mel Gibson sneak up on the rail, just to keep things interesting. But just like that, the race has changed. Gibson hasn’t starred in a major film in five years. Cruise lost his cool on Oprah’s couch, and it’s unclear if he can get it back. And Hanks, while undeniably bankable, is, at 50, no longer viable for most leading-man scripts. In the past year, all three men have been eclipsed. With a worldwide career box office of $4.4 billion, Will Smith is now the most powerful actor in Hollywood, followed by Johnny Depp and Ben Stiller. Talk about punctuated (or maybe that should be “punctured”) equilibrium. “The industry is going through a sea change, not just with actors, but in every way,” says one industry insider who, like others interviewed for this story, asked for anonymity to prevent offending other stars. “Will Smith is the only thing in this business—the only thing—that represents a guaranteed opening weekend.” He may be even bigger than that. “Let’s put it this way,” says one studio head, “there’s Will Smith, and then there are the mortals.”
fiona
May 1, 2007 at 6:38 pm

Hollywood’s leading ladies may be better at grabbing glossy ink, but when it comes to earning top dollar, the men still have them beat.

Fair or not, men are bigger earners both in front of and behind the camera. In fact, the male entertainers, excluding athletes, on Forbes’ annual listing of the World’s Most Powerful Celebrities earned on average nearly twice as much as the list’s women. Moreover, the 25 top-earning men on the list alone raked in $1.9 billion collectively over the course of a year, compared with their counterparts’ $671 million.

Among the advantages of the actor over the actress: career longevity.

“Men playing romantic leads into their 60s are not at all uncommon,” says Robert Thompson , the founding director of the Center of Television and Popular Culture at Syracuse University. “That’s not so much the case with women. Every now and again, a juicy Meryl Streep role will come along, but the good roles have tended to include a much smaller age span for women than they do for men.”

And while Thompson believes that’s beginning to change, as evidenced by Diane Keaton’s recent roles in Something’s Gotta Give and Because I Said So, he doesn’t see it happening too quickly.

James Ulmer, author and creator of the Ulmer Scale, which measures stars’ bankability, chalks it up to simple economics. “The demand for women in star-driven tent-pole movies isn’t there,” he explains. “And even though women are a growing force at the [box office], studios still feel more comfortable making these huge action adventures geared toward international male audiences.”

That explains why Tom Cruise, raked in $67 million over the course of the year. Or why Denzel Washington, who boasts a laundry list of action-packed flicks, earned $38 million. By comparison, Jodie Foster, the top-earning actress on the list, garnered only $27 million during that same time period.

One thing the experts do agree on: The discrepancy is no different, and perhaps even greater, for those in director positions. In fact, there were no women among the six directors in our admittedly small sample of best-paid celebrities. And when Martha Lauzen, a professor of communication at San Diego State University, looked at the 250 top-grossing films of 2006, she found that only 7% had women in director positions.

“We’ve got all of these superstar directors–the Scorseses and the Tarantinos,” says Thompson. “There is a certain … I don’t want to say machismo, but let’s face it, directing has kind of got that.”

Also falling into the category of the high-profile and the high-paid is Steven Spielberg, who pulled down $332 million in the span of a year. And with many major projects to come, big money will continue to flow his way. Among the director’s upcoming ventures: the much-buzzed-about Transformers flick and the fourth installments of the Indiana Jones and Jurassic Park franchises. Add to that On the Lot, a reality TV project to find the next big filmmaker, with Survivor’s Mark Burnett on News Corp.’s Fox.

Then there’s George Lucas, who earned a hefty $235 million over the course of a year, thanks in part to residuals from his beloved Star Wars and Indiana Jones franchises. The director’s wallet is expected to grow still thicker when Indiana Jones’ fourth installment, which he co-wrote and executive produced, hits theaters next year.

“I wish there was a happier story to tell,” adds Lauzen. “And I think we don’t hear a lot about it because it isn’t a happy story.”

To determine which entertainers made the most money over the course of a year, we turned to the 2006 edition of the Forbes Celebrity 100 list, which ranks the most powerful actors, authors and directors based on their media exposure (magazine covers and TV and radio mentions), Web presence (number of Google hits) and earnings.

Source: Forbes

libraesque don’t cry and shut up please
fiona
May 1, 2007 at 6:41 pm

Forbes Magazine has just released its 2007 listing of the World’s Most Powerful Celebrities, and guess what: Tom Cruise ranks atop this year’s list, earning $67 million. Rounding out the top five are, in descending order, rock singer Mick Jagger; talk show hostess-producer Oprah Winfrey; rock band U2; and golfer Tiger Woods.

The list measures both the stars’ earnings and their influence within their respective fields. Movie industry analysts say men have the upper hand through career longevity and overall box-office appeal. (voanews.com)

oh lit encore sa grosse bouse
fiona
May 1, 2007 at 6:42 pm

Tom Cruise Tops ‘Forbes’ Magazine List of Most Powerful Celebrities
By Ray McDonald
Washington
30 April 2007

When it comes to entertainment earnings, men still dominate. Forbes Magazine has just released its 2007 listing of the World’s Most Powerful Celebrities, with men on average earning nearly twice as much as their female counterparts.

Tom Cruise in scene from War of The Worlds
Movie actor Tom Cruise ranks atop this year’s list, earning $67 million. Rounding out the top five are, in descending order, rock singer Mick Jagger; talk show hostess-producer Oprah Winfrey; rock band U2; and golfer Tiger Woods.

The list measures both the stars’ earnings and their influence within their respective fields. Movie industry analysts say men have the upper hand through career longevity and overall box-office appeal.
Anne
May 1, 2007 at 7:33 pm

My favouite saying:

There is only one TOM CRUISE. Congs Tom!
Sasha
May 1, 2007 at 9:42 pm

Go Tom. Now he has his own studio, which mean as a mogul he will earn more. Yes, i agree Anne, there is only one Tom Cruise.
Miapocca
May 2, 2007 at 11:15 am

” Movie industry analysts say men have the upper hand through career longevity and overall box-office appeal.”

Becaues the Annes in this world buy the tickets to drool over the fools
LIBRAESQUE
May 2, 2007 at 11:57 am

Sasha, now that he owns his own studio HE HAS TO PAY HIMSELF TO WORK cuz NO ONE else wants his crazy anymore…..NO ONE

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

loooooooooooooooser
Laurie
May 2, 2007 at 1:09 pm

Defintely Anne, there is only one Tom Cruise. Other stars pale when they are near him. I wish I could shop like Katie. I would too if I had all that money!!!
Laurie
May 2, 2007 at 1:14 pm

I forgot to comment that Victoria is such a cutie. She defintely will teach Katie how to deal with haters.

That newsweek list is hopeless. It had Brad Pitt at No 4 who has not had a hit in six years. What was the compiler thinking? Obviously he wanted to take a jab at Cruise. Must be ashamed that the Forbes list which is more credible than his has proved that his list is hogwash. BS.
Sasha
May 2, 2007 at 4:10 pm

Brad Pitt is a has been, who care about this pussy whip. Do not mention this idiot here.
Sasha
May 2, 2007 at 4:12 pm

Brad won an oscar for which movie? Keep dreaming.
LIBRAESQUE
May 2, 2007 at 4:26 pm

and to jackie/laurie who said pitt hasn’t been in a hit movie for 6 years (which HELLO, Babel) when in reality TC hasn’t been nominated for anything (BUT A RAZZI AWARD,AND the most annoying celebrity award, which he WON) in 6 years in a role that most people felt he was playing himself
Anne
May 2, 2007 at 4:35 pm

And now, he has just been announced as the most powerful celebrity on planet earth.

I am sure the compilers of the list forgot that Brad Pitt is the most powerful celebrity on earth, on no, may be Will Smith. Forbes magazine must be losing it. LOL. Next time they should ask people not computers. After all computers are not run by people but aliens who are ofcourse scientologists and would most likely favour Cruise.

Aliens are invading our world. LOL.
!!!!!!
May 2, 2007 at 5:43 pm

I will directly quote my poat on Babyrazzi, no need to write it again.

633. Jackie | May 1st, 2007 at 6:49 pm
Here is another quote fromthe forbes list:

‘Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

————————————————————————————-

Emphasis:

Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’
!!!!!!
May 2, 2007 at 5:48 pm

Lib someone has beaten you hands down, accept and move on. You predicted his demise, and yet he comes out on top of the Forbes list for a second year in a row. Stop making an ass of yourself. I know it hurts bad and if you could, you would kick their rotten asses but am sure you and Friedman would love a list where Cruise does not even make it but Hayden Panantierrie does. The truth is that that is not going to happen in this century. No.
LIBRAESQUE
May 2, 2007 at 6:26 pm

can you READ whatever your name is????

LOOK at how they compile their list, money, google hits, radio mentions!!!!

are you kidding???

Tom Cruise has been the laughing stock of the entertainment busines since May of 2005 when he jumped on Oprahs couch, do you see any coincidence there????

Of course he won 2 years in a row, he’s made headlines and news as the biggest freak ever!!

how stupid can you be exactly. The Forbes list is A JOKE so you REALLY need to get over it.

Come back and talk to me when he makes money (like will smith) AND is revered by his peers in the business (like will smith)
!!!!!!
May 2, 2007 at 9:06 pm

Can’t you read Lib, they told you that is not enough! I will quote again.

Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

——————————————————————————–
Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

——————————————————————————–
Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

——————————————————————————–

Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

——————————————————————————–

Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

——————————————————————————–

Repetition is for emphasis.

Bow for TOM CRUISE he is King!
!!!!!!
May 2, 2007 at 9:08 pm

I think repeating this will also help.

‘Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

—————————————————————————————-

Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

————————————————————————————Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

————————————————————————————Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

——————————————————————————————–

Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful nBreakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

—————————————————————————————-
Breakups, babies and betrayals monopolized the headlines nearly eclipsing the careers of actors such as Jennifer Aniston and Angelina Jolie. But generating headlines isn’t enough to solidify your standing in Hollywood. A fat paycheck won’t do it, either. Only a combination of earnings and sizzle will land a celebrity a coveted spot on our Celebrity 100 list of the most powerful names in the business’

—————————————————————————————-

I hope that helps
libraesque
May 4, 2007 at 10:21 am

your stupidity astounds
do you even comprehend what you keep cutting and pasting?

earnings= fat paycheck
sizzle=headlines

how can you be so retarded?

I have to say again this list is a joke

Because the cast of the Sopranos (#9) and the cast of D.H. is not a “powerful” celebrity you no name idiot

All it means is money and your mug on the gossip rags will get you to the top
SO yea, TC DID deserve to win 2 years in a row, because since May 2005 he has brought the crazy to the table
!!!!!
May 4, 2007 at 12:58 pm

Look just face it everyone,

I will post whatever I feel like making up because I LOVE TOM CRUISE and if that means I have to use 100 different identities here (which I am close to now) I will and you cannot stop me!!!!!!

If it wasn’t for me you know full well there would only be a handful of pro Tom supporters and that is why I pretend to be other people.

I have admitted before THAT I AM A SCIENTOLOGIST AND PROUD OF IT and that means that

TOM CRUISE IS MY SAVIOUR

the head of scientology EVEN PUBLICALLY STATED THAT SO IT MUST BE TRUE
Carol
May 8, 2007 at 10:14 am

That was exciting, looking at a picture of Katie and Posh getting in the car. They are both ugly.
libraesque#1
May 8, 2007 at 10:43 am

what’s REALLY strange is the video of V.B from x17 of her going from shop to shop….there’s no Katie. What did she do call her and say

“Look, I know you dress like a total frump, but you can still ride on the coat-tails of my paparazzi frenzy, GET DOWN HERE. I’m leaving but the paps are swarming!!”

seriously, Katie wasn’t with her on her shopping extravaganza, I saw the video.
Bricks and Stones Gossip
Jun 8, 2007 at 12:31 am

[…] Source Subscribe in a reader […]