b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Entertainment Channel Subscribe to this Feed

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

Katie Holmes Leads Tom Cruise

by leora on March 26th, 2007

People often comment on pictures I put up how Tom Cruise practically drags Katie around while in public.  In this picture from the Mentor LA gala honoring Tom I think it’s clear that Katie is the one dragging Tom.  Maybe their relationship is more normal than everyone thinks?

Katie Holmes leading Tom Cruise

Source Tags: , ,

POSTED IN: Gossip, Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise, TomKat, TomKat Pictures

38 opinions for Katie Holmes Leads Tom Cruise

  • bumblebee
    Mar 26, 2007 at 12:32 pm

    Hehehe, thanks webmistress. There´s several of such pictures around but most bloggers ignore them! ;-)

  • Helen
    Mar 26, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Great picture.

  • Brit
    Mar 26, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    bumblebee you’re right. You can always find several very cute pictures that show them or celebs in general smiling and being normal but the blogs will most likely choose the ones without the smiles. Anyways, they look cute together.

  • Stella
    Mar 26, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    She’s not walking. SHe’s trying to stand with her pigeon toes flopping in both directions.

  • kiti
    Mar 26, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    She’s not walking. Looks like instead of dragging her as usual, he’s pulling her back this time, stopping her in her tracks.

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Mar 26, 2007 at 6:36 pm

    I’m just confused by her posture. This is a gorgeous tall woman but she seems to be doing a weird combination of throwing her shoulders back while simultaneously pooching her tummy out.

    I wonder if Posh is giving her some retarded “modeling” type “tips”. That’s what it looks like to me, cuz those girls always look so un-natural

  • Anne
    Mar 26, 2007 at 7:43 pm

    He he he. Tom looks cute being drageed around. Lol

  • Kay
    Mar 26, 2007 at 7:49 pm

    Katie isn’t walking in that picture she is posing with terrible posture. She used to be a beautiful woman, look what Tom did to her.

  • Helen
    Mar 27, 2007 at 3:27 am

    making an exception from ignoring the losers… Miapocca I saw your comment on babyrazzi regarding AIDS and how Scientologist don’t campaign for it?? well here is Tom Cruise participating in a fundraiser in 2001 for the ELIZABETH GLASER Pediatric AIDS Foundation.

    http://allstarz.hollywood.com/tomcruise/charity02.htm

    ————————————————-
    In case you don’t remember here is your comment.

    #100. Miapocca | March 16th, 2007 at 5:22 pm

    okay just to add …Jenna Elfman was asked to contribute to a child AIDS campaign, she refused…

    *going back to ignoring losers*

  • Donna
    Mar 27, 2007 at 4:35 am

    I’ll agree with kiti. He’s basking in the glow of the lights and she just wants to get going.

  • !!!
    Mar 27, 2007 at 4:44 am

    She is walking here is a follow up of that picture.
    http://www.katie-holmes.org/gallery/displayimage.php?album=1026&pos=97

  • Helen
    Mar 27, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    you guys will find this funny. Our beloved loser libr is pretending to have worked for the entertainment industry now. lol

    If I remember correctly she told bumblebee, her friend used to work at CAA….now she is claiming she worked for the industry for 10 years at babyrazzi…hehehehehe

    I think this girl can’t separate her ass from her head.

    I wonder how old she is anyway?? I really thought she might be between 10 to 19 but this changes everything.:)

    here what she said…

    #130. Libraesque | March 27th, 2007 at 12:53 pm

    !!!, and what do you base your information on? Personal first hand knowledge? You’re a family member, or a close friend??
    Do you, or have you worked in the entertainment business? Because I did for almost 10 years, and most of my friends still do…

  • Mrs. Guttman
    Mar 27, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    I was briefly employed in the entertanment industry. I worked as an assistant on Days of Thunder. I have some stories. I will not share them here.

    I do find it interesting that Mr. Cruise married, in the 1980s a woman born in the 1950s; in the 1990s a woman born in the 1960s; and in the 2000s a woman born in the 1970s. (Remember, before Katie, there was Penelope who was also born in the 1970s) I see a pattern. Dakota Fanning will be eligible 2020s. Realistically, Ms. Fanning will not be considered. Mr Cruise will marry to someone we have yet to be indroduced.

  • libraesque
    Mar 27, 2007 at 2:51 pm

    Helen, I can’t help it if you and all your friends in Podunct Idaho only know people who work at the DQ and WalMart
    However, I DID work in Entertainment Law for nearly 10 years and have mentioned that before, on this site I believe. Selective hearing much???
    And YES I have friends in the business still, you can’t really be born and raised in L.A and not. Sweetheart, EVERYONE in L.A. is connected in one way or another
    You may want to stop embarassing yourself, because there is no discrepancy in ANY of my comments regarding my former employment, or friends of mine in the business.

    And the fact that you use hehehehe says you’re in the 12-19 age range

  • Helen
    Mar 27, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    hehehehehe

  • libraesque
    Mar 27, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    Helen, Anna, aka Ana, aka Anne,Anna,Ana. Anne, I’m SO embarassed for you. Honey, when you go to high school tomorrow, you may wanna stop by the library and look up IGNORE, because what you’re doing ISN’T!!

    1. refuse to acknowledge;
    2. bar from attention or consideration;
    3. fail to notice
    4. give little or no attention to
    5. be ignorant of or in the dark about

    Another one bites the dust hey hey!!!

  • Helen
    Mar 27, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    *ignoring stupid loser*

  • libraesque
    Mar 27, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    Helen, I’m SO embarassed for you. Honey, when you go to high school tomorrow, you may wanna stop by the library and look up IGNORE, because what you’re doing ISN’T!!

    1. refuse to acknowledge;
    2. bar from attention or consideration;
    3. fail to notice
    4. give little or no attention to
    5. be ignorant of or in the dark about

    Another one bites the dust hey hey!!!

  • libraesque
    Mar 27, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    Helen, can’t take it that you made a COMPLETE ASS of yourself?????
    Poor baby!!!!!

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Mar 27, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    OH!!! Poor TomKat fans….I see that KatieHolmes.com is going to be SHUT DOWN, because, OH what’s this….the fans are ….SELFISH

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Mar 27, 2007 at 6:38 pm

    Ahhh, silence is golden

    *not missing the losers*

  • Mrs. Guttman
    Mar 28, 2007 at 8:41 am

    My, my…. you all are quite harsh with each other. Aren’t we all “losers” for taking the time to type comments on a site that, in reality, doesn’t matter on bit? We all have far better things which we could be doing.

  • Anne
    Mar 28, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    *REFUSES TO BE GOADED. CONTINUES IGNORING LOSERS*

  • Diandra
    Mar 28, 2007 at 2:23 pm

    # 22 true for you so bye. I can not go and waste time on people i do not like, so i am always amazed at people coming and talk shit about people they do not like. You use your time wisely

  • libraesque
    Mar 28, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    #24 I would suggest you use your time wisely too and not come to a site you don’t regularly visit, JUST to tell someone you don’t like or agree with that you can’t waste time with them!!!

  • Anne
    Mar 28, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    Good point Diandra #24
    Did you notice that some losers even visit katieholmes.com? WTF? how pathetic is that? I can forgive a hater for visitng tomkatcrazy.com since the name can be interpreted to mean Tomkat are crazy but to visit a site dedicated to a star just to bash her and hateher? That is an all time low. Gal you need help ASAP!

    I guess she was the douche bag Eylul outed and banned from the site some time back

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Mar 28, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    Anne, you know what’s REALLY interesting? That these “conspiracy theories” abound with TomKat, and yet it’s clear from todays posts you’re all the most paranoid suspicious people EVER.
    I went to KH.com because I was directed there by someone on another site to compare pictures from one of the rags.
    And if I were to adopt your idiotic mentality, then surely, by the simple fact that you all share the same opinion, and more than routinely pat eachother on the back about the most inane things that YOU, Anna, Ana, Diandra, Leah, !!!!, bumblebee, jackie, etc etc, are ALL actually the same person!!!

  • Anne
    Mar 28, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    *IGNORING LOSERS*

  • Stella
    Mar 28, 2007 at 9:51 pm

    Anyway, she’s turned into a weirdo, by a freak, and had a weird baby by some guy we still don’t know who is the father.

  • Diandra
    Mar 28, 2007 at 9:59 pm

    I have a husband and a child to take care of , unlike you. Your full time job is to go to every sites to preach, you really are a stupid woman. You have a bizzare lifestyle.# 29 you want to know who the father is? then ask the tabloid to make enquiry.

  • Anne
    Mar 29, 2007 at 7:39 am

    #29 Speak for yourself, you don’t know the father, the rest of us do. Quit your jealousies and grow up.

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Mar 29, 2007 at 5:50 pm

    FYI STELLA,
    Anna (Ana, Anne), Helen (aka Ana, Anne, Anna), Leah, and Bumblebee all have front row seats in the deluxe Cruise Baby Making Room, so you see, it’s NO USE arguing with them, they KNOW!!!!

  • Anne
    Mar 29, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    Yeah and you had a threesome with Katie and Hartnett when she was having a ‘revenge f**k’as you called it. According to you, Katie was 10-11 months pregnant when she had Suri in Jan 2005 Mysteriously might I add since we saw her every week at least twice or three times in January. Or better Still suri is an alien and appeared on a space ship.

    *Back to ignoring losers if they can’t deal with pertinent issues raised*

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Mar 29, 2007 at 6:27 pm

    End of April to end of January is 40 weeks, that’s what we here in the good ol USofA call the gestation period!!

    Where’s Issac Washington when I need him, I need a cocktail the size of my head

    adios loca ni os

  • Helen
    Mar 30, 2007 at 3:29 am

    If Katie got pregnant April 18 (which is the date of Tom and Katie’s date)she still will gives birth in January you moron. Please don’t remind us you’re from the USofA because all that does is make people think the whole of US is as dumb as you are. Plus stop with this nonsense if you can’t even name the date Suri was born.
    Bye bye…

  • Anne
    Mar 30, 2007 at 6:49 am

    OMG, Libraesque, you are priceless. And suicidal too. Gestation period id 36 to 40 weeks and by the end of April, Katie was with Tom as Helen pointed out. I told you January was your worst bet and November was your best bet. I am sorry gal but Isaiah Washington hates fags too,so he wouldn’t give you the time of the day.

    Now, what date did Katie have Suri since we saw her twice or three times a week everyweek for the whole of January?

  • Anne
    Mar 30, 2007 at 6:53 am

    You know Libraesque, I always found it unfair that all polls show that people think Americans are the most stupid people in the world since America is a great country and very developed I must say, but with people like you and George Bush representing, am starting to understand all these polls.

    It is not surprising if you get your education from TV soaps and when you put 2 and 2 you get 8. What is the world coming to???? (Apologies to more intelligent Americans)

  • Celebrity World
    May 30, 2007 at 11:32 pm

    […] In this picture from the Mentor LA gala honoring Tom I think it’s clear that Katie is the one dragging Tom. [Source] […]

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: