Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

18 opinions for Katie Holmes Home from Vegas

• jajorge
  Dec 17, 2007 at 6:20 pm

  she looks like she’s wearing a helmet.

• kristiko2
  Dec 17, 2007 at 7:05 pm

  She looks soooo cute!!! I am so happy for her!!! She has a great husband and a wonderful daughter and a fabulous life!!! She deserves it all!!!

• New York
  Dec 17, 2007 at 10:16 pm

  The helmet really is not a good look. I thought she looked pretty exotic when she was all “done up,” but YIKES, definitely not a good look with the girl-next-door helmut cut. After a lot of thinking, I really think these two (TC and KH) are just trying way too hard! If you had nothing to prove or weren’t trying to sway public opinion, you wouldn’t try so hard. Katie, what happened to you?! Who are you?! Sadly, I bet you don’t have that answer either. It’s so sad! Woman to woman, lose the helmut! Tom probably wants you in a helmut so that he can pretend you’re a gladiator or some rough-and-tumble dude. We hear he likes you to “dress up” in mini skirts. If you watch the movie Gladiator, most of those gladiators wore mini gladiator outfits too. Oh, it’s all making sense now. Lose the helmut. Lose TC. Grab your beautiful baby and RUN!

• jajorge
  Dec 18, 2007 at 12:08 am

  new york, you nailed it when you asked: who are you?????? what exactly IS kh’s personality? she used to be girl-next-door and completely american; after the marriage and with posh her new bff she’s morphed into posh suddenly; what’s she trying now? cleopatra? she needs to find out who she is. where’s this tigress that jada pinket-smith was saying katie was? tigresses know what they want, and dress to fulfill their objectives. lies, lies, lies.

• sunnyshine
  Dec 18, 2007 at 8:23 am

  I think she looks lovely! I’m also very happy for Katie. To me though, she’s just Joey Potter playing dress up. I think its fab that she takes Suri everywhere. I dont think she “sells” her at all. Go Katie!

• bumblebeej
  Dec 18, 2007 at 9:55 am

  I don’t think the haircut *really* new. She’s had a fringe (bangs) since she got the bob, they were slightly longer though. Still, she’s garnering attention from it. I do agree with the others that she’s changing so much and so often, it’s hard to tell if she’s confident in who she is… Yes, people change their hair, but she’s been continuously changing since she and TC have been together. At first, she retained the down to earth, girl next door image. Then when she was pregnant, same image, but with some smart coats etc. It seems to me that she debuted this super slick, fashionista persona she had suri (i.e. around Vanity Fair cover time). She’s getting more and more ‘fashionable’ all the time, but it lacks any kind of stamp of individuality… At least I think Posh knows how to express herself and her personality through haute couture (spelling?) (but I still think Posh is overrated!)

• bumblebeej
  Dec 18, 2007 at 10:17 am

  There are some photos of KH here http://theskinnywebsite.com/site/2007/12/17/katie-holmes-is-getting-thinner/

• toledo fan
  Dec 18, 2007 at 10:57 am

  and here;
  http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrities/hollywood/katie-holmes-shops-talks-about-tom-202994/

• toledo fan
  Dec 18, 2007 at 11:06 am

  the haircut is a good look- the long hair was not doing it for her unless she had it up and styled- when not, it always looked messy/scraggly.
  the top is odd tho- isn’t that meant to be worn with a camisole? Her “fashion sense” is all over the map. most times odd, rare times- normal looking. I see that she actually has on pants/jeans that aren’t dragging on the ground, and it looks like she has been wearing more sensible shoes lately. she just looks more “normal” here. (until the “handler” comes into the pics!)

• Battlemama
  Dec 18, 2007 at 12:30 pm

  I am glad she is happy, but I DON’T NEED TO SEE HER B R A!! That is just gross and unattractive, no matter who you are. Is she trying to be one of the bunnies to TC’s Hugh Hefner? Save it for TC AND in your bedroom, Katie!!

• Battlemama
  Dec 18, 2007 at 12:44 pm

  Perez hilton has posted that VALKYRIE has been pushed to Oct 8th for opening next year. Either Kh is preggo, barely, or TC can’t face the thought of going against Jolie in WANTED next summer. Maybe KH is running another marathon next fall and she is going to pull off what she did this year for the LIONS OF THE LAMB premiere. More power to her if she is doing another marathon.

  Libra: You are in the business: Why would anyone postpone a movie release like that? (Please ignore the fact that it is Cruise involved here.)

• Battlemama
  Dec 18, 2007 at 1:27 pm

  Perez is saying KH is preggo and that is why. Here is what another site says:

  “The release date for Tom Cruise’s Valkyrie has been pushed back from July to October 2008, because filming has yet to be completed. This movie has seemed doomed from the start. — Variety” This is from POPSUGAR.

  Maybe Kh will debut a new by then or at least get a shirt that is not see through.

  Wasn’t she wearing this shirt in NY when Cruise and her were out and about?

• smartgurl23
  Dec 18, 2007 at 3:06 pm

  Katie looks great

• jajorge
  Dec 18, 2007 at 5:06 pm

  what playboy bunny has her cup, i wonder! she shouldn’t be drawing attention in that way to her rather bad feature. vaunt your other features, katie, like you face, but don’t try to vaunt your chest cuz you haven’t got it! hmmmm, so what’s a personal shopper? anyone?

• Battlemama
  Dec 18, 2007 at 7:28 pm

  I am thinking it may mean Sciento. handler. Keep KH in line. Keep her from running. I am not that rich to need a personal shopper.

• Libraesque2007
  Dec 20, 2007 at 3:37 pm

  there is no other reason except competition with a smash hit like Wanted. Jolie is on top of the heap right now, and they can’t take the heat….specially with a movie that everyone says they are either boycotting or have no interest in seeing

  You don’t announce a release date then say you still have footage to film….it’s not done. Also it makes NO sense to push a release date 3 months up for one scene

• toledo fan
  Dec 20, 2007 at 4:23 pm

  libra- interesting- he just gets weirder and weirder!

• Battlemama
  Dec 20, 2007 at 4:44 pm

  Honestly, I have notice in Hollyweird that they tend to go through genre phases. Right now it is more action/adventure not something serious like this. As I said before, people need escapes from what is going on right now, not heavy things like LIONS FOR LAMBS and VALKYRIE. Look at the Box Office…Smith’s vampire movie is on top. I think Kidman failed here in the U.S. because people were boycotting the show because of the author trying to kill God in THE GOLDEN COMPASS series.

  In terms of interviews, i think it is more that he is an ego maniac and does not want to be made a fool of if they call him on his behavior and comments. Same thing with the ding bat he is married to. Because there is a serious gap between the two. Also, can either of them think off script.
  I’m telling you, both have got to be doign some serious drugs because I doubt there is much functioning in between the ears of either one. That and they look drugged out most of the time.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Entertainment
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture