Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

47 opinions for Katie Holmes Fabric Shopping in Hollywood

• Entertainus
  Mar 6, 2007 at 7:53 am

  Could be one for Katie or even for that movie she’s taking part in.

• Sasha
  Mar 6, 2007 at 8:18 am

  This dress looks like a child dress. Maybe it is for the upcoming birthday for Suri.

• Anna
  Mar 6, 2007 at 9:35 am

  #2 Could be, but home girl cannot draw if her life depended on it. LOL. I hope we see Suri at the games. I cant wait.

• Sally
  Mar 6, 2007 at 12:24 pm

  she needs to stop wearing tight pants/skinny jeans. They look terrible on her. Not enough curves and the pigeon toe action is not easy on the eyes. Plus, what is she doing trying to design ANY clothing? She has no fashion sense. Hell, look at the way she is dressed during LA’s 85* weather! Oh…and I am surprise to see that she isn’t cuffed to one of her handlers? What gives..?

• bam
  Mar 6, 2007 at 12:52 pm

  Katie’s looksfugly espeically the one when she is looking up.

• Sally
  Mar 6, 2007 at 3:37 pm

  Okay…I need to scrub my eyeballs. I just saw something else katie should be working on: the birthmark that is the size of Ohio on her backside! Ughhhhhhhh….see: katieholmespictures.com

• libraesque
  Mar 6, 2007 at 3:49 pm

  I don’t understand how her face went from being completely angular at the Oscars, to looking hella puffy like it is here!!!

• Sasha
  Mar 6, 2007 at 5:25 pm

  Ok the webmistress is definitely not a TomKat fan, i am a fan and can not come here and read those nonsense. From now on ,i will no longer visit this site and go to real fan sites.

• Leah
  Mar 6, 2007 at 5:59 pm

  Please Sasha don’t go away, I enjoy you posts and you always take on this libraesque loser like a champ. Lol

• Helen
  Mar 7, 2007 at 5:42 am

  Webmistress, you should change the name of this site because I always thought it was a non-fan site but I started visiting here after I read about it from another forum and I love it, its all about Tom and Katie positive and not so positive but it will be nice if the web name was Tomkat, Tomkatfan or something else without the crazy.

• Kikousi
  Mar 7, 2007 at 7:50 am

  I love her!!! She´s my fav. actress! ITA with you Helen!

• Miapocca
  Mar 7, 2007 at 12:21 pm

  http://www.theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/

  Sceintology on rasing children
  http://www.skeptictank.org/hs/cos-kids.htm

  A letter addressed to Katie from TMZ..LETS HOPE SHE REALLY DOES READ THE SITES

  . Dear Katie:

  The following is from a caring father in Ohio.

  Observe what posters 5, 12, 15, 23, 35, 37, and 41 have stated about your short interview on TMZ. Feeling “honored” to be Suri’s mother is not how a typical mother would feel about her child. Suri is lucky to have you as the mother and Tom is most fortunate to have you as the mother of his child.

  You are a vulnerable young lady (mentally and emotionally) whom is very susceptible to being controlled by a variety of external factors which are not in YOUR best interst. You grew up in a Catholic family and are now being exposed to the beliefs of a single HUMAN being namely L. Ron Hubbard. Have you never heard of the verse that states “BEWARE of FALSE PROPHETS”. (Scientology). For those of you that are not familiar with Scientology…Google “Scientology Wikipedia” for a quick overview. Please note: I am not advocating that the Catholic religion is not without it’s faults

  Scientology lake many cults appeal to those that have had troubled pasts. It helps them deal with their past demons if you will. As you know, many actors(such as Tom) have had very troubled pasts which makes them good actors. They always had to escape mentally in some fashion to preserve their sanity. You were chosen to be Tom’s wife because of your vulnerable and naive nature. Mental manipulation by an older male is difficult to understand and accept by many young woman. L. Ron Hubbard has done it masterfullywith many followers and Tom has done dramatically well with you. (sorry Katie…I truly don’t meant to hurt you by expressing my feelings)

  In your mid 30’s to early 40’s, you as a woman will regain you “independent” thinking and see things far differently than you do now. Tom will have what he wanted, “a young woman bearing his child” whom he will also control and guide into Scientology. You will have served his purpose and of course will be compensated monetarily for your sacrifice. You will have money however you will not have love and possibly no longer a career. Hollywood does not treat older females well as you know.

  The course is set, your parents have tried desperately to guide and nurture you. Hopefully some of the positive parenting that you had when you were a child growing up in Ohio will remain lit and come back some day. Tom is a good actor. A good actor can easily be a GREAT manipulator. Abuse comes in many forms…….mental abuse is one of them.

  Praying for both you and Suri.

  A Caring Father

  Posted at 3:26AM on Feb 27th 2007 by A Caring Father

• Shelsey Grammar
  Mar 7, 2007 at 2:10 pm

  Miapocca,
  …vulnerable young lady “who” is….not “whom” is. “Whom” is generally preceeded by a preposition.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 7, 2007 at 4:35 pm

  Wow, someone actually posted that letter to Katie???
  Did you read on another site that Tom plans on being on the set with her while she shoots her new movie?
  “Tom has called producers and told them he will be on set every day,” an insider tells Page Six. “He wants to observe what’s going on and will probably help Katie out.”

  Okay, there is absolutely NO REASON for this guy to be there. My thought is he will be there to try to prevent her from making friends with the cast, friends he hasn’t “approved”. God forbid she actually talk to someone without having somebody monitoring her.

  I don’t know why she’d need “help” That doesn’t say much for how TC feels about her skill as an actress. She was on a long running series and has made 12 movies
  WTF!!!!

  OH and #13, you’d be spending your time more wisely correcting the spelling and grammar of Anna, Leah, Angel and Sasha.
  #12 appears to be able to form a sentence, unlike the others

• Leah
  Mar 7, 2007 at 5:40 pm

  Nice letter Miapocca but then again isn’t someone manipulating all of us at one point or the other? The writer too wants to manipulate Katie, that is why they wrote that letter, to influence her actions what do you call that?

  Libraesque, the problem is that common sense is very rare when it comes to you. How is Tom supposed to be on set of Mad money every day when he is filming Lions for lambs? or had you and that insider forgotten?

  That aside, Katie was on set of MI 3 everyday, so? Big deal? Will Smith was on the collateral set while Jada was filming, I did not hear any complaints?

  I know what is bothering you, you once said that Katie will never make a movie again you have been proved wrong as has been the story of your life so far. You will have to get used to swallowing your words if your common sense is always on leave as it seems to be!

• Jeanette Jones
  Mar 8, 2007 at 8:34 am

  Gosh, Kate looks even taller with those seriously-high heels. They must be at least 4 inches. And regarding Tom wanting to be on the set of Kate’s upcoming movie, I doubt if he can spare the time as she had to attend several Oscar functions without him as he was on set. And if he does go, it could be that as a mother, Kate would love to see Suri too. I do know that working mothers worry over their little ones and that goes for whether you are a superstar or not.

  Besides, on an earning capacity, Tom earns way more than Kate (his movies have made more than One Billion US$$$) so Kate wanting to work is purely her choice. And good for her.

  There is also a lot of gossip here about Tom putting Kate on a leash and yet there are dozens of photographs of her without Tom in Paris and Rome and other functions. I guess the paranoids will now write and say he had secret minders following her.

  If these critics dislike the Cruises so much, why read about them or take the time to talk and discuss them? I personally would not give someone I dislike the time of day and not spend negative, wasted energy on them. Could itbe they secretly admire the Cruises??????????

  Jeanette

  Pity there are a few on this site whose brains are at their feet as they are not putting 2 and 2 together as they are so filled with hate and loathing coming from within them.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 8, 2007 at 4:41 pm

  Leah, WHEN did I ever say Katie would never make another movie again? You’re trippin’!!!

  You and Anna, et al., come here and make these statements as if they are fact, then when confronted you can never back your shit up
  I was commenting on an article I read somewhere (it’s actually on every gossip site) that he was going to be on the set. Here’s the thing, I’m not a TC fan so not only do I not give a shit about a film he’s shooting, which I’ll never go see, I also don’t know the filming schedule of said film.
  And WHERE did you get that KH was on the set of MI3 everyday, CRACKHEAD, once again I must ask you to reference this info, just like I did with your “Brad Pitt is fading, everyone says so” to which you NEVER did

• Jeanette Jones
  Mar 8, 2007 at 5:05 pm

  See, I have commented before that all Libraesque reads are trashy gossip magazines (and we all know how “trustworthy they are!) and she has just confirmed it. And for someone who supposedly hates Tom Cruise, she certainly puts aside alot of time to follow what they do, read up on it, take actual time to write on it (and unwittingly promote his name even more) so who is the “CRACKHEAD” NOW, EH????

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 8, 2007 at 5:15 pm

  Jeanette ONCE AGAIN, I’m asking you to REFERENCE the article in Forbes that says that Brad Pitt is fading, since you’re such a scholar.
  Do you know what reference means?????
  Or are you and everyone else going to KEEP AVOIDING the request, and my questions.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 8, 2007 at 5:25 pm

  you know what’s pathetic JJ, that you’re on every TC thread on the internet saying the same thing, but it’s so sad that you don’t realize how idiotic you sound making a comment like
  “unwittingly promote his name even more”.
  Only YOU would think that gillions of people bashing the shit out of TC on these threads would constitute “promotion”
  I hate to break it to ya honey, it’s doing the exact opposite.
  These internet gossip sites have become powerful in the way that people are perceived in this business. And the handful of you TC freaks going to these sites in your pitiful attempt to praise TC is really sad. What’s even more sad is that since every single one of you is spelling and gramatically challenged, you’re not presenting a very good argument in his favor.

• Jeanette Jones
  Mar 8, 2007 at 11:43 pm

  Libraesque, are you stupid or what? I (listen carefully) did not make that comment re Brad Pitt and have NEVER mentioned him in any of my emails. Or are you forgetful as well, as you asked Leah this very same question in another email. You have got yourself into such a mad lather that you cannot even remember who made which comment. A touch of dementia here, I see.

  Challenge me NOW on any grammatical or spelling errors. And “promotion” means the act of furthering something - so keep up the good work

  Jeanette

• Sally
  Mar 9, 2007 at 11:22 am

  Meeeeow! I used to come her for the latest articles on Tom and Kate but I am seriously enjoying the banter from a few bloggers.

  (I hope I didn’t make any grammatical or spelling errors)

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 9, 2007 at 12:15 pm

  so JJ, you’re telling me the meaning (which I know btw) of the word “promotion”. Why? Proving that you know what it means still doesn’t take away from your idiotic comment that you actually believe that by people bashing TC on these blog sites constitutes “promotion”
  Explain how you think this is in ANY way promotion?????

• Ana
  Mar 9, 2007 at 2:15 pm

  Libre-loser, I see you learnt a new word ‘pathetic’ if you looked it up in the dictionary, you would find your name and picture there.*smiles, tries to suppress laughter*

  You know JJ is right, bashing Tom is making him more famous, part of the reason he was No1 Forbes Mag (of course and many other reasons). Why else do you think his wedding made breaking mews and world headlines for a week?

  In this industry, no publicity is bad publicity (ofcourse unless you are famous for being pussywhipped).

  Besides, however badly Tom falls, his movies will still make ten times the money his competitors make. So my dear Loser-gal who has become a ball to kick on this site (ha ha ha!!!)cry yourself a river, Tom Cruise is not going anywhere!!!!!

  Do the spell check gal.

• Ana
  Mar 9, 2007 at 2:55 pm

  Please moderator, why are you handling libraesque with baby fingers. Please Please Please, edit mu post and put it back. Libraesque deserves all that she is getting and I enjoyed writing that post. It is my best so far.

• Ana
  Mar 9, 2007 at 2:56 pm

  Thanks you are a sweetie!

• libraesque
  Mar 9, 2007 at 3:24 pm

  Ana, Anna, you need to put the crackpipe down honey.
  And what exactly is it you think I’m “getting” because anyone with half a brain can see I’m schooling everyone on these threads.

  OH, btw all you Cruiser fans it’s a sad day for you all. Matt and Trey take a stab at the queen of $cientology in the new issue of Rolling Stone

  hahahahaha

• bumblebee
  Mar 10, 2007 at 5:20 pm

  Yeah?! I don´t think so. They take a jab at Scientology. Aside from “Hi Tom” in that photo, there is not much of Cruise bashing going on. Did you ever read it, libra?

  Here it is:

  http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/south_park_still_sick_still_wrong/page/1

• bumblebee
  Mar 10, 2007 at 5:23 pm

  It´s rather informative on how religions tend to take jokes very badly, the catholic church had “Bloody mary” banned and Comedy Central “wussed out” on showing the Mohammed cartoon. It´s an interesting read, thanks for pointing me there, libra. Credit where credit is due.

• Helen
  Mar 12, 2007 at 8:24 am

  #17 LIBRAESQUE, If you don’t care what Tom and Katie do that includes if he is filming or not then why do you spend all your precious time on them? you’re at babyrazzi, tomkatcrazy, TMZ and so on taking about them?? That doesn’t look like someone who doesn’t give a shit about them!! Since you know all the gossip about them you should know Tom is filming, producing and running a studio right now so how is he going to be at Katie’s set everyday?? use your common sense.

• Helen
  Mar 12, 2007 at 8:25 am

  And yes Katie was at MI 3 movie set almost everyday you can check the pictures at Katieholmespictures.com and Katieholmes.com!!!

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 12, 2007 at 10:22 am

  bumble, your rabid dedication is amusing. If you can’t see how damning, and mocking that statement is, that one of the most respected comedy writing teams in Hollywood directed specifically at TC and his “religion” is…..well…..what can I say. And it’s in Rolling Stone mag., not the Pennysaver.
  Oh and your welcome, too!!

  And Helen, YES the anti-Cruise people are on a lot of the rag sites, spreading the word. Both sides do it, so stfu. (and I’d never heard of babyrazzi, until someone here mentioned it so I went there and posted, but the intelligence level there is far lower than here so I no longer waste my time with those feebs)
  I’m not concerned with his filming, etc, because that’s not the problem I have with him, at all. I don’t think he’s a bad actor. Born on the Fourth of July….WOW, he was outstanding in that. Now Keanu Reeves, THAT’s a shitious actor.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 12, 2007 at 10:25 am

  btw, Helen, unless that site has posted a gillion pictures of her, in a different outfit, I don’t quite understand how anyone can claim she was on the set everyday.

• mark
  Mar 12, 2007 at 5:38 pm

  “YES the anti-Cruise people are on a lot of the rag sites, spreading the word”

  Please do it, all the jackass qwho buy all the tabs crap are shit. who cares?
  certainly not Tom.
  It’s not an audience for him. He shit on you.

• Leah
  Mar 13, 2007 at 6:07 am

  Libraesque, ask any of those rags which pictures are the most priced from the photo agencies? You think it is Brangelina, think again!

  Besides, those Anti-Cruise people are just a handful of disgruntled bloggers like you with nothing better to do but spend all their days on the internet spewing hate. The rest of the world adores Tom Cruise. Did you know that October 10 is Tom Cruise day in Japan. No one else has ever had such an honor. To have a day in a foreign country dedicated to them.

  Tom will rule forever and those South Park guys, if they died today, it would not even make it on the news of any foreign country. They are nobodies with jealous for every one better than them. You should like them because they are like you. Only you are more pathetic because you do not even have a proper job. Yes you do not!

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 20, 2007 at 12:22 pm

  leah…..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, you’re too too funny…a FEW disgruntled bloggers? You’re BANANAS!! Google I Hate Tom Cruise, I think you’ll probably CRY there are so many sites.

  HAHAHAHAHAHAAH You know who else is REALLY popular in Japan?
  Michael Jackson
  and David Hasselhoff

  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, you really do make me laugh!!!!

  South Park is an American, Emmy Award-winning[1] animated television comedy series about four fourth grade school boys who live in the small town of South Park, Colorado. The series was created and is written by Trey Parker and Matt Stone, and has been distributed and aired by Comedy Central since 1997. It is mostly known for its comedic handling of current events and its pop-culture parody.

  The Los Angeles Times reported that, “For Stone and Parker, Closetgate will be the gift that keeps on giving” because there are likely endless story lines that can follow, considering South Park’s consistent satirizing of Scientology. This episode was also recently nominated for an Emmy,[7][8] and is included on South Park’s 10th Anniversary DVD, called “South Park The Hits: Volume 1″. This episode is also included on the DVD Recorder, called “A Collection of Funny Episodes.”

  As a parodic response to The Church of Scientology’s litigiousness, the final lines of the episode feature Stan taunting the church to sue him, and the ensuing credits read only “John Smith” or “Jane Smith”.

  South Park has been nominated for the Emmy Award for Outstanding Animated Program six times (1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2006). So far the show has only won once, for the 2005 episode Best Friends Forever.
  On April 5, 2006, it was announced that the show had won a Peabody Award. This is the third Comedy Central show to win, following two awarded to The Daily Show for its 2000 and 2004 presidential election coverage and one given to Mystery Science Theater 3000 in 1994.
  South Park was nominated for important awards such as the 1998 Annie Award for Outstanding Achievement in an Animated Primetime or Late Night Television Program. It was also nominated for the 1998 GLAAD Award for Outstanding TV - Individual Episode for Big Gay Al’s Big Gay Boat Ride. It also received an Image Award nomination for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series (Isaac Hayes) in 1999.
  South Park was nominated for a 2006 Teen Choice Award for “Best Animated Show”, but was defeated by the show Family Guy.
  South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut was nominated for an Oscar for “Best Music, Original Song” for the song “Blame Canada”. They lost to Phil Collins and made fun of him in two consecutive episodes in season 4 (Cartman’s Silly Hate Crime 200 & Timmy 2000). They were fully expecting to loose, just not to him. It was performed by Robin Williams during the televised award show, which was the first to carry a TV-14 parental advisory, in part because of the performance of that song, which contains some adult language.

• bumblebee
  Mar 20, 2007 at 3:27 pm

  I was expecting a LOT more results! Funny, most hate sites have been abandoned and turned into graveyards. Not even Freekatie has all that much traffic a day … anymore?!

  This is funny:

  “THIS BOARD IS NOT DEAD YET (Helpkatie still here)”

  LOL!!! Sounding desperate???

  Hmmm, I guess most people grew tired of the bashing. You´re out of the loop…. the story of your life!!

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 20, 2007 at 3:33 pm

  you’re delusional bumble, they don’t turn into graveyards, it’s well know people are FORCED to take the sites down, don’t be an idiot

• Anna
  Mar 20, 2007 at 4:44 pm

  Yeah, I googled I hate Tom Cruise wow, I had a laugh of my life, poor souls, of course they love him enough to keep up to date with him. And their best quotes are from Star Magazine.Lol.

  O.K Libreloser, google, I hate Bill Gates, finished, yes, great people will have losers who will always be jealous of them. Now, google, I hate libraesque, finished, meaning nobody hates nobodies like you!!!!!!! Bwahhhhhhhhhhh

• Anna
  Mar 20, 2007 at 5:30 pm

  I have been checking out these I hate Tom cruise, what a bunch of losers and you were right Bumblebee, most of the sites are dead apart from one which is hilarious since it purports to hate Tom but they seem like Jealous fools who cannot believe he is a God among men. Lol

• Helen
  Mar 21, 2007 at 9:20 am

  Not only Bill Gate, try I hate Oprah too.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 21, 2007 at 10:49 am

  HELEN!!!!!
  we actually have something in common!!
  I hate Oprah too! BIGGEST media whore EVER

• Anna
  Mar 21, 2007 at 8:51 pm

  Yeah, just like you libraesque, not to know sarcasm when it hits you right in the face. You are so think it hurts! Have you been to school anyway? You seem illiterate in your reasoning am not insulting you but that is how you come across. Posters on Babyrazzi will support me on this.

  Helen does not hate Oprah, she is telling you that like Tom Cruise, Bill Gates, and Oprah, all successful people have hate sites dedicated to them by jealous people like you! Am not surprised that you actively hate oprah. You seem to hate any one better than you. I am not her fan but I never waste negative emotions on strangers. ( unlike some people I know)

• Helen
  Mar 22, 2007 at 4:11 am

  Libraesque, You’re so funny NOT!!! Anne, she know what I meant she just pretending because she running out of things to say. And she hate all people that are successful no suprise there.

  Oprah the great humanitarian, media whore? Does Angelina Jolie ring a bell?

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 22, 2007 at 10:04 am

  Helen, I don’t expect you to comprehend the meaning of a true media whore because you’re clearly an inferior person who simply goes along with the crowd.
  YES, Oprah is a media whore. She spent 40 MILLION dollars to build ONE school for 140 girls. THEN she flew all her black friends over, as well as ET to show what a great person she is. THEN she had an hour long special to further prove to the world how great she is. She even had “invitations” on her website that she encouraged people to print out and give to all their friends so they would be sure to watch her show telling how great she is. She then suggested people have viewing parties so as many people as possible would know how great she is.
  If AJ did that the haters would go absolutely APESHIT

  As soon as Oprah goes to third world countries and lives with those people in need for weeks at a time like AJ does on her field missions, then I’ll reconsider my stance on her.

  EDUCATE YOURSELF. Don’t be such a pussy that just goes along with the crowd

  http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2007/01/20/outside_oprahs_school_a_growing_frustration/

• bumblebee
  Mar 22, 2007 at 6:22 pm

  By the way, if these sites were “forced to be taken down” - how come they are still ONLINE?? (But not having much visits!). Sites that are taken down ARE taken down as in NOT ONLINE ANYMORE.

  LOL - this chick does never disappoint.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 23, 2007 at 9:37 am

  several anti TC and anti Scientology sites have been shut down that I know of.
  I don’t know about these other sites you’re talking about because you didn’t mention what they were

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Entertainment
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture