Katie Holmes and Suri Cruise in Hollywood

Aww look how cute Suri Cruise and Katie Holmes look! I wonder what they bought from Pottery Barn Kids?
Via People Tags: katie holmes, suri cruise, pottery barn
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Katie Holmes, Katie Holmes Pictures, Suri Cruise, Suri Cruise Pictures, TomKat Baby, TomKat Pictures

88 opinions for Katie Holmes and Suri Cruise in Hollywood
mynameal
Dec 9, 2007 at 1:52 pm
kh you must get rid of that man of yours he is nuts and you would be better off without him and save your baby from him too run kh run
toledo fan
Dec 9, 2007 at 4:58 pm
same pic but with a smile
http://www.hollyscoop.com/tomkat-pictures/22.aspx?PGImageID=1956
toledo fan
Dec 9, 2007 at 5:00 pm
I wonder if the bodyguards get paid to carry the umbrella, bottle, blanket, shopping bags, etc ????
kristiko2
Dec 9, 2007 at 5:00 pm
Aw, Katie and Suri look sooo cute!!!
The people that are haters like liberace and such….eat your heart out!!! lol!!!! You are just bitter and jealous!
toledo fan
Dec 9, 2007 at 5:07 pm
More at: celebrity-gossip.net
go to bottom of page under ‘more celebrity gossip’ and click on katie holmes. if you click on “continued under the main pic of KH with SC- you will get the rest of the pics.
jajorge
Dec 9, 2007 at 5:23 pm
what the heck is katie doing with her lips? and no, we are not bitter and jealous. i can honestly say that i don’t hate any other celebrity, not even paris nor britney, only holmes and cruise. nor am i a kind of person who doesn’t believe in criticism. i’d love to see katie actually DOING something well like jolie and theron, even doing some actual parenting that doesn’t include just shopping and buying designer clothes for her only child. what kind of political system doesn’t tolerate criticism or opposition? think about it, kristiko.
jajorge
Dec 9, 2007 at 5:38 pm
checked out the site toledo. in those full-length shots, you can see her pants. you couldn’t pay me to sweep the ground like her! and didn’t they say that scientologists didnt’ celebrate christmas? what about some consistency between what they say and do? this is not jealousy nor bitterness. i hate lies.
Balletmama
Dec 9, 2007 at 5:39 pm
Well said jajorge. I have a problem with the fact they use their kid for PR purposes. It is one thing for KH to sell herself, another for her to sell her kid.
I am not jealous. I have a real relationship with real man and three wonderful kids.
What is up with the bug-eyed glasses? I used to have a pair. I realized how ridiculous I looked in them and got rid of them.
lemon227
Dec 9, 2007 at 7:00 pm
To the poster who said that people were “jealous”, come on, jealous of what? This woman takes a pair of expensive pants that probably cost more than some people’s car payments and makes them look cheap because she doesn’t know how to wear them. I saw the pics on another site that Toledo Fan posted that shows the woman walking ON the pants. Raise you hand if you think old girl needs to hire a tailor. As my father would put it, “You can take a ten dollar pair of pants and wear them in such a way that you still look classy or you can take an expensive anything and make it look dime store because you don’t know how to wear it and look presentable.” Just goes to show that “TRUE” class can’t be bought and like the commerical goes, “It’s priceless!!”
taurusgirl
Dec 9, 2007 at 10:38 pm
Well said, Balletmama and Jajorge. I am not jealous of these two either. The same things about them offend me that offend most. I cannot tolerate the deception that they think they are pulling off. There is nothing real about these two and the way they continue to fake being the perfect family is annoying. I, too have a wonderful husband, we are in a real relationship and don’t feel like we have to try like these two do to convince the world we are in love. They need to just give it up. Nobody is buying it anymore, if anyone ever did.
Carla
Dec 10, 2007 at 4:53 am
Like I said before, she will not get pregnant with him again, because she didn’t get pregnant with him with Suri. WHoever the real father is, I hope he extorts a great deal of money out of Cruise, since he gave up his daughter for a real jerk, and to keep his mouth shut. In a sense, I guess everybody makes out well, because of Suri. WHat a kid!
candice
Dec 10, 2007 at 5:48 am
I wouldnt say that you ladies are jealous but i would say that you are a bunch of nasty crows with nothing better to do than get on the internet and look up a couple that you obviously dont like and have a big whinge about them. I mean if your husbands and children are so wonderful why dont you spend your time with them instead of continually b*tching about a couple that you dont know or like. How can you read what is in the tabloids and believe all of it. You dont know that they arent going to celebrate christmas. just because the gossip mags say they arn’t does that make it true. I have been reading the comments made on this website for months and cannot believe how cruel and nasty some of you can be to a 2 year old girl. You do nothing but pick on her and the way she is being raised. Do you see behind closed doors?? I know you all think she is being pimped to the world. Man that is bullsh*t. Tom and katie kept her away from the camera’s till they felt she was old enough and everybody said she didnt exist and there was a big scam now they proudly show her off and she is being pimped. My husband is always showing off my daughter as he is a PROUD PARENT!! Wake up to yourselves and get a life. I dont even like tom and katie much but they have a beautiful baby who i dont think deserves being talked about the way you people carry on. You must all be the perfect parents who have your kids off the bottle at the right time dress them in the PERFECT size clothes never let your kids chew on their fingers or pull funny faces. Wow what wonderful worlds you must live in! I dont think i will ever understand how you can hate two people so much but log onto a website called tomkat crazy and waste precious time whinging about them. Isnt it time you grew up and started living your own life, as perfect as they must be it would have to be more interesting than being a pack of nasty b*tches.
smartgurl23
Dec 10, 2007 at 11:36 am
Cute Suri and Katie
Libraesque2007
Dec 10, 2007 at 1:05 pm
yea, I don’t get the dragging pants thing……the only thing I can think of is that maybe she had stilettos on and after a day of shopping her feet were killing her, and she bought some flats????
and ENOUGH with that d a m n infant bottle MY GOD I don’t think theres a picture of them in the last 6 months without that bottle and blanket. No other celebrity parents are this bizarre!!!
And my friends and I were talking about how CPS would be called in an instant if Britney was photographed with her 1 1/2 year old at a loud pop concert!!!! The media would CRUCIFY her
jajorge
Dec 10, 2007 at 7:09 pm
yeah, isn’t it weird how the media’s all over certain people like britney spears for bad parenting. i’m not going to try to defend her, but at least in comparison her babies were never snapped with bottles at suri’s age, nor can the same accusation apply that she uses her sons for publicity as much as katie and tom. with all her problems, i don’t perceive her as being so selfish as to use them to revamp her career. the media likes to pick on certain people incl. jolie-pitt, paris, lohan, spears and seem to love others like aniston and the cruises. it just seems so unfair.
jajorge
Dec 10, 2007 at 7:11 pm
remember how the media criticized britney for failing to put a hat on little sean on the beach? how come it wasn’t mentioned when katie took suri out into the waters in the mediterranean? gwyneth had protective headgear for little apple at a concert, but did suri?
jajorge
Dec 10, 2007 at 7:14 pm
and nice try trying to explain the long long long pants. maybe she just thought she might be able to start a new trend. good luck, katie. you will never be my inspiration!
englishrose
Dec 11, 2007 at 10:21 am
why does poor Suri never wear a coat especially when her Mum has one on, no logic behind that, the first thing a Mum says when the weathe is cold is put your coat on, what the heck
Libraesque2007
Dec 11, 2007 at 10:53 am
a lot of young girls in the city do the same thing….they’ll wear flip flops with their long dress pants then put heels on at work….it’s disgusting, all that crap on the ground and your pants dragging in it
BLECK!!!!!
and I agree about britney…..the haters went APE S H I T when Britney didn’t put a hat on her kid….they were even screaming about sunblock!!!! I’m sorry, how the h e l l can you tell that a kid doesn’t have sunblock on??????
Balletmama
Dec 11, 2007 at 11:14 am
Couple of thoughts about the media thing:
Jolie has gone after the press for photographing her kids. She also doesn’t w h o r e her kids out like the Cruises do. That is why the media is so against them because Jolie and Pitt have bosy guards who shove the press away. I think the media loves the Cruises because they bring Suri out and pose for them. Most celebs don’t smile and pose for the cameras like these two idiots do. I think KH boo-hooing in the press about how mean they are to her has helped.
I read somewhere that celebs hire, I wish I could remember who, to do damage control for them. I know they work with the PI that said Cruise was straight. It used the example of Michael Jackson, who has had numerous child m o l e s t a t i o n charges brought against him, yet he is still popular. The same thing with Eddie Murphy, although his was for other l e w d conduct and p r o s t i t u t e s. Cruise probably has a whole team working for him.
Besides, in the word of L. Ron, sue and they will get weary and give up. If Cruise will sue over South Park, then people know he will sue over anything. That is why KH will lose custody of Suri…Cruise has a great legal team and they could even bankrupt her daddy.
Balletmama
Dec 11, 2007 at 11:17 am
I just hope KH enjoys her money!!! That is all she will get from this deal if she divorces and I think she knows it. I think the only reason Nicole is seeing her two kids now is because Cruise has Suri, the bio PR girl.
Balletmama
Dec 11, 2007 at 12:34 pm
Accordign JJ, KH is on the cover of IN-STYLE mag. I guess she is getting her contract agreement of mag. covers and being noticed for her “fashion”. She also “dishes about fame, family and her career.”
If someone can get a copy of the article, it may be rather interesting to see what was programmed to say.
kristiko2
Dec 11, 2007 at 12:44 pm
Oh, you sou peeps are SOOOOO SORRY!!!!
Just look into the Psychology of the sour posts and learn that ANY….yes ANY….Negative POSTS… will be believed….no matter what they are….because humans will BELIEVE ANYTHING…. positive but MORE when it’s negative….I feel sorry for you Trolls that will bite at anything negative set before you!!!! Hahahahaha!!! Post anything you want agter my post…Don’t care one bit….lolololol!!!! Suckers!!! Liberace…you are a stalker!!!
toledo fan
Dec 11, 2007 at 1:23 pm
(Libra, et al-Remember what we said/did about smartgurl?)
Libra- I agree about the pants- they are dress pants as opposed to jeans- she always wears dragging jeans- which amazes me because isn’t she tall and wouldn’t the length be an OPPOSITE problem for her??? so-o-o-o, she had the dress pants tailored for her usual stillettoes, her feet probably hurt, or whatever- so she wore flats- and instead of changing her slacks- too much trouble and she can just throw them away when she gets home-she wore them dragging on the ground- so tacky. Like someone said earlier about “you can’t buy style or class”- true, AND some would say- you can take the girl out of toledo but you can’t take the toledo out of the girl- there are some classy people here but VERY FEW- remember the term “blue collar”?
Libraesque2007
Dec 11, 2007 at 1:32 pm
no honey, YOU look into the psychology of sour posts, the rest of us will continue to discuss the freakshow that is tomkat
btw….what does “agter” mean??? ….never mind, I don’t care
mama….I have a question….WHY does every thread about these nutsacks call suri SURI CRUISE
they don’t call violet VIOLET AFFLECK on every thread, or shiloh SHILOH JOLIE-PITT
It’s really bizarre….you NEVER see a thread that just says katie and suri…it’s always both of their last names…..and how does anyone know that suri’s name is suri cruise????? did tc adopt her????
toledo fan
Dec 11, 2007 at 1:32 pm
now, as for the photo op here- OF COURSE!- even I shop the internet and catalogs. the ONLY reason someone with that kind of money would go OUT to shop instead of sending a servant or ordering it direct, is for PHOTO OPS!! and the reason SC does not have a coat on?- we or maybe whoever gave the outfit to SC wouldn’t be able to see it on her! (she does look cute here, even her hair is combed)
I think it’s so tacky how the poor bodyguards carry the crap- what would they do if someone ACTUALLY attempted to do something to KH? can’t pull your gun or give chase while holding bottles, blankets, shopping bags, ect. geeze! anyone even told her about or given her a DIAPER BAG or STROLLER????
Balletmama
Dec 11, 2007 at 1:50 pm
The same reason we have to listen PI’s tell us that Cruise prefers women. In the book I read, it refer to Cruise as “the h e t e r o s e x u a l TC,” not TC. The point was clearly made. I am starting believe you about h o m o thing, but I still think he go for both. He used the W o m b he paid well for.
Maybe the press also needs to remind MS. Holmes that she is just Ms. Holmes and not Katie Cruise, the related mother of Suri Cruise or wife of TC. I mean doesn’t the name just separate her from her daughter. She will never Katie Cruise, with the same last name as her daughter Suri Cruise. She was the W O M B donor, bought and paid for. At least Kidman and Jolie have their kids’ names with their last name (Connor Kidman-Cruise, Shiloh Jolie-Pitt).
Besides we have to be reminded that wannabe Katie Holmes is Suri Cruise’s mother.
I think the fact that Suri’s name is not hyphenated or KH having the same last name is quite significant. As a mom, I would flip out if I did not have the same family name as my kid. It would seem exclusitory to me. Maybe Cruise is reminding Katie who Suri really belongs to, pre-nups aside.
As far as the courts are concerned, the only way TC will get his name off the birth certificate as dad is through a paternity test. Kh will lose money and credibility if she does that. Cruise can also sue for fraud. Legally, kh is stuck with what happens when she is Ms. Holmes divorcee.
Libra: What is it with these rabbid TC/KH fans not being able to say anything intelligible or maybe it is the attrocious spelling?
I am willing to listen to what they say, but I don’t like their name calling of others who disagree with them.
jajorge
Dec 11, 2007 at 3:02 pm
hahahahah. lolololololololol! the “sour” posts are getting kristiko to look into the “psychology” of critics, and it sure sounds like it’s riled that totalitarian machine up, alright! if you have anything positive to say, say it, but don’t chastise us for our critical comments, and don’t attribute them wrongly to “jealous[y] and bitter[ness]”. in my experience, people grow from criticism, and criticism is necessary to formulate a healthy Hegelian dialectic in a healthy democratic society. i know that people like kristiko exist, but i don’t try to force my views down his/her throat, nor do i attack him/her for sharing personal views, nor do i try to delve into the psychology of those attacks to come up with a superficial and completely wrong diagnosis. you can say whatever you want after this, but lolololololololol!
Libraesque2007
Dec 11, 2007 at 3:33 pm
mama, it is phenomenon that has been recognized by many many people all over the internet (that tc seems to have THE most illiterate fan base, whats’ left of it)
My guess is that these are very young $cientology minions, who are home-schooled with the teachings of the raving lunatic LRH, and NOT spelling, math, grammar, etc.
They’re not bright. On JJ, one of them posted using 7 different user names…only she wasn’t smart enough to not use the same mis-spelled word in every single post………”wonna” instead of “wanna”
so………..pitiful
Balletmama
Dec 11, 2007 at 4:02 pm
Maybe we all need some kind of anti-criticism drug or to have our thetans purged.
I think Cruise avoids the criticism and the growth from it because part of Sciento. is to avoid people who would bring you down/criticize you. Bad thetans, I believe.
Any way, what did you think of the last name thing that I wrote about?
toledo fan
Dec 11, 2007 at 4:24 pm
VERY WELL SAID above 4 posts!
as for the name thing- KH is probably holding on to her last name to appear to be “her own person” in the industry and no riding on TC’s “coat tails” (which are quickly getting shorter and shorter). Suri probably does not have KH’s last name because TC does not value women and therefore does not value her last name (or scientos do not allow the mother’s last name)
toledo fan
Dec 11, 2007 at 4:29 pm
TC is so full of himself he probably demands his last name be used in every photo op, or….the publications/sites have to remind us who these two are linked with ’cause that’s their ONLY claim to “fame”.
toledo fan
Dec 11, 2007 at 4:46 pm
balletmama- there is only this right now on the ‘In-Style” site-
http://www.instyle.com/instyle/celebrities/transformation/0,,1072291_6,00.html
it will be interesting as she has such a limited vocabulary or…is only allowed to say certain words, can we all say “AMAZING”. :P
Libraesque2007
Dec 11, 2007 at 4:46 pm
I find it very telling also…..it’s very strange, and I agree, if she were mine, she’d have my last name or at the least a hyphenation.
tc can’t sue for fraud, he and kh both knew what they were getting into. I think they both used (and continue to) eachother. He asked her to marry him when she realized she was pregnant with JH’s baby so the g a y “rumors” would go away. She accepted to keep her image, with minor tarnish. I’m confident that her father drew up an iron-clad pre-nup in his daughters favor. Ironic that he’s a catholic divorce atty…..I guess kh is no stranger to hypocrisy
jajorge
Dec 11, 2007 at 6:59 pm
why can’t i post?
jajorge
Dec 11, 2007 at 6:59 pm
drug called s-o-m-a, like on b-r-a-v-e n-e-w w-o-r-l-d?
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 12:30 am
why can’t I post either?
…will try tomorrow
Lilianne
Dec 12, 2007 at 8:52 am
I have been half paying attention to the posting lately and saw one posted yesterday I wanted to respond to. I am only doing so because I kind of have a problem with peope sometimes being critical of others for things they do themselves. To me this is being a hypocrite. Yesterday Balletmama made the comment that many TC and KH fans can’t say anything intelligent or spell properly. I am not a fan but I have said things in defense of them and I can and do speak intelligently and spell properly. The hypocrisy comes from BalletMama often misspelling things herself. For example, in the same post I referenced before she said the fans spelling is “attrocious”. That word only has one T. Also in some of her recent posts we see “bosy” meaning bossy perhaps? We see “caste” instead of cast. And unless I miss my guess “narcistic” and “exitance” are not spelled correctly. Mama…I don’t do this to pick you apart or to be hateful and if you take it that way I apologize to you sincerely. I didn’t spend a lot of time looking at past posts to find your mistakes and I only did it to make a point. I know that when typing it is easy to make mistakes. And when people make them it bugs me too because I am very particular about things like spelling and speaking intelligently. But I don’t point them out to others because to me it is being somewhat self-righteous. I just think that people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Oh and for the record Libra…since you asked….”agter” is quite clearly meant to be “after”…the poster who wrote that comment obviously had her finger in the wrong place and typed the g instead of the f. Doing that doesn’t make that person stupid…just careless.
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 8:52 am
I was under the impression the Connor and Isabella are Kidman-Cruise. Am I incorrect about this?
I still think Cruise will come up with a way to get Suri from her. maybe he will start her on drugs, if she isn’t already. Or maybe he will make her look like a fool and say she lied to him about Suri’s paternity and leave KH with no money!!!
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:13 am
I do try to spell correctly and write clearly. I do reread my posts before submitting and after and I usually correct most of the mistakes. Unfortunately once I post, I can still see the mistakes and I CAN”T CORRECT THEM!!! A good editor will always find mistakes with something published in final form.
Lilianne: I only responded this time because I am tired of being called a hater, mindless, and stupid as well as being psychoanalyzed from someone who doesn’t know me.
Why don’t you go after them? They are the ones who are openingly insulting everyone who does not agree them. Maybe the glass house analogy will be perfect for them too!!!
Or are you now going to be part of that crowd…the site critic of everyone’s comments?
My apologies for my lack of perfection!!!
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:17 am
Toldeo: The article is on Just Jared. It mentions that KH will be on the cover of IN STYLE mag. in January 2008. It is kind of ironic that it is happening in January when her movie will be released and Andrew Morton’s book.
Also, there are new pics of Cruise at Will Smith’s movie premiere as well as when Smith got his star in Hollyweird.
Lilianne
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:24 am
Mama…when did I call you a hater, mindless and stupid? How was I psychoanalyzing you? I wasn’t trying to be “the site critic of everyone’s comments.” I was trying to point out that it is my OPINION that it is not fair to criticize others for things you do yourself. That was my whole point and I am sorry if you missed it. I also said I am aware that it isn’t possible to never make mistakes and I will go on to further say that a person who never made a mistake never made anything. I fail to see how you can accuse me of becoming the site critic of everyone’s comments when that is what people do here?! They respond to what others say and they either agree or they don’t. As Libra often points out…people are free to express their opinions. I often see people get criticized for not sticking to the topic of the thread. Well, when you see something in the thread and you respond to that comment, that IS sticking to the topic of the thread.
I wasn’t asking for an apology for your “lack of perfection” and your implied tone in that statement is not only unnecessary it is also childish.
I have no wish to argue with you about this. I aplogize again for upsetting you with my comments. I will just repeat that I have a problem with people criticizing others for things they do themselves.
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:28 am
Lilianne: One more thing…I am not upset with you for your comment. I like constructive criticism because I can actually do something with it. I am a stickler about grammar and spelling and I try to do my best when I post. (I am a product of public school education, which explains a big part of my grammar and spelling problems.)
One thing I hate about all this blogging and e-mail is that good language usage is going out the window. The other is that I can’t edit my comments once they post if they are not correct or they come off harsher than I intended.
I only made the comment about the spelling because I had trouble reading the comment posted. I am sure she was probably writing fast, as I do when I post here sometimes, but if you are going to insult someone with psychology, at least make sure the majority of the words are spelled correctly!!!
I am sure you realize by now, I do like a good debate!!
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:33 am
Lilianne: You haven’t called anyone names. If anything, you have certainly given me things to think about and have been one of the people who can disagree without name calling. Sorry my comment came off that way. I was merely responding to why I said what I did about the other comment and the fact they are calling everyone haters, etc.
Lilianne
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:39 am
Mama…I appreciate your comments and I thank you for clearing things up with me. I too went to public school but most of my education came from being an avid reader. I grew up in a family where good grammar and spelling were not used and I learned about such things from reading anything and everything I could get my hands on. I love words and I agree with you that using out language properly and well has gone out the window. The reason I make as few errors as I do is because I am a n a l enough to read what I type and constantly backspace and correct my typos.
Anyway…thanks again and I hope you have a good day. I have to go think about getting lunch ready.
taralexis
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:53 am
I guess if my life, marriage and child were all apart of this tabloid fodder, I too would do what I could to defend or exploit it. I would want to maintain control in my own life instead of having everyone tear it apart and criticize it!
I am a total celebrity gossip junkie, and yes, sadly my life is that boring. But what I want to know is how you all have the insider-secret stuff?
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 11:54 am
Lili, one only has to look at the fans comments to realize there isn’t a brain in any of their heads….seriously. My biggest peeve is spelling and grammar, we all make mistakes however. That doesn’t mean I (and others) don’t have a right to make observations about the overall tone of the fans comments!
Lilianne
Dec 12, 2007 at 1:02 pm
Libra, I don’t agree with you that “there isn’t a brain” in any of the heads of KH and TC fans. I am sure that somewhere there must exist at least one person with a brain. I agree with you in that spelling and grammar mistakes peeve me too. I never meant to imply that you (or anyone) have no right to make observations about fans comments. I was only saying that I personally find it frustrating when people criticize others for doing things that they do themselves. I wonder at something though….How is it then when others make “observations about the overall tone of the fans comments” it is simply within their rights. When I did it today I was accused of becoming the “site critic for everyone’s comments”. Aren’t they, in effect, the same thing? I don’t really expect an answer from you or anyone about that….I was just wondering how or why it is different.
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 2:15 pm
I don’t know lili…..you seem to analyze stuff to death.
People just react the way they react. I know i do………I get irritated when people say “don’t do this/don’t do that…do this do that, so my reaction is DONT tell people what to do!! which is in essence telling someone what to do!
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 2:32 pm
OH, WOW! I find this extremely interesting……….on the Spice Girls Blog they DO NOT mention tomkat in their blog about how many stars came out to see them!!!!!!!!!
I can see how they would be annoyed that he’s such an attention W H O R E that he made a spectacle of himself
I had heard that he asked posh for tickets and she said the concert was sold out ….she couldn’t get any….so his solution I guess was to glom in on the beckham box.
jajorge
Dec 12, 2007 at 3:51 pm
lilianne made a good point. so many people are hypocritical, criticizing people for behaviors that they engage in themselves. spelling and grammar mistakes, in my opinion are not that relevant on this kind of site. but in defense of balletmama (i’m not her, nor do i represent her, so i can’t say exactly but), i believe that some of her attacks on pro-cruises were a reaction to the generalizing comments, particularly of kristiko, who accused “liberace” and other anti-cruises of being jealous and bitter. now, surely, it is wrong to make such generalizing comments, and in my view the differences of opinions on this website come not so much or at all from grammatical differences, but from differences in values. people with similar values tend to share opinions as well. this is not to say that i do not respect that people will have different values and opinions from me. they too are valid. my one criticism against people like kristiko is the lack of respect towards those with opposing views. i guess this was your original point. neither side should express intolerance or lack of respect for opposing views.
jajorge
Dec 12, 2007 at 3:55 pm
on the beckhams, it’s so confusing! are they still bffs with the cruises, or not? some articles say yes, others no. there haven’t been any beckham-cruise sightings by paparazzi apart from the rehearsal and concert. and why didn’t katie accompany posh to the european fashion shows like last year, like some magazines were asking? anyone?
jajorge
Dec 12, 2007 at 3:56 pm
no one is perfect, but we can all try, no?
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 4:01 pm
what I find pathetic is, on several sites I’m accused of being a tc “stalker”. What these not-very-bright-fans don’t realize is that when they make comments like “you’ve been on every single tc thread for years, you even make comments on his fansites” they are in fact outing themselves as being MY STALKERS!!!!!
it’s beyond creepy
for instance with krisco calling me “liberace”……about TWO years ago a tc fan used to call me that on the Superficial…….and she’s calling ME a stalker????
creepy
jajorge
Dec 12, 2007 at 4:06 pm
i think it’s funny, actually. b/c if they’re accusing you of being on every single tc site, they’ve obviously also been visiting those same sites! really, they’re incriminating themselves! hahaha.
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 4:22 pm
oh boy…………jada p.s. has once again successfully pissed everyone off with her ludicrous ramblings about their and tomkats relationship. When are they going to just SHUT UP……no other celebs go on and on and on about eachother like this….it just makes it seem so FAKE!!!!!
“There are not many women who are married to the type of men we are married to. Katie [Holmes] and I … talk. We throw some ideas around how to manage all the things we have to manage on a daily basis, so we have the opportunity to have our own lives and be mothers. So, we do it definitely on a whole personal girlfriend get-down. They do it on a business level.”
this seems like code talk for how to manage being married to g a y men!!!! I mean what does kh have to manage? what pair of stillettos to wear so she can trip and fall and drop her baby while shopping?
jesus these train wrecks seriously belong in the loony bin!!!!
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:10 pm
Where was this article, Libra?
Is Leora going to post about all these TC sightings with the Smiths, who are not Scientologists?
New York
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:18 pm
Latest news, Tom is stomping his tiny little feet (with huge four-inch-heels) and demanding that Katie Holmes change her name to Kate Cruise. I think he’s behind the “makeover” too. The guy is a living nightmare. If she had wanted to change her name, she would have changed it when she got married to you, DwarfBoy. I also believe that if she had ANY intention on staying in the marriage, she would have no qualms with changing her name to Katie Cruise, NOT Kate. Personally, I love the name Katie. It’s sweet and it’s cute. She used to be sweet and cute. Now I just feel terribly sorry for her to be in this cruel nightmare of a life. Run, Katie, run!
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:20 pm
New York: Where is the article? I would like to read it.
New York
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:23 pm
Balletmama, I hope this link posts. I just Googled Katie Holmes and this came up,
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=30371&cat=2
Balletmama
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:36 pm
I thought they were Sciento. only. Why are they sending out Christmas cards???? Seems hypocritical!!
Should I send out a Family Hannukah card, even though I’m Christian?
She married the nut job. She will have to comply or loose her money.
I wonder if Bella and Connor got to sign it or even be in the family picture.
Thanks for the link, New York!!
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 6:59 pm
honestly I don’t remember where I saw the article……
there has been SO much speculation on katies name………her given name is actually KATE, and I can’t remember where I read it but I thought I saw something that said none of her friends or family call her Katie, they call her Kate….toledo, can you confirm that????
Libraesque2007
Dec 12, 2007 at 7:03 pm
and I comepletely agree on the hypocrite thing re: christmas. It doesn’t say much for their beliefs in $cientology. It would be like if I converted to Judism and continued to get a christmas tree and open presents and make a big meal on the 24th!!!!!
blasphemy!!!!!!
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:09 pm
wow you guys have been busy! I have been away so couldn’t post much last few days.
Here is a link to a pic of the infamous card;
http://www.usmagazine.com/exclusive_first_pic_tom_cruise_and_katie_holmes_holiday_card
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:26 pm
Libra- we have never heard her called or referred to as anything but “Katie” by family or friends. Don’t know about Katies friends but would guess they also call her “Katie”.
ck this out- as if there was any question!!
http://www.usmag.com/whos_got_the_power_100807?slideshow_id=353&o=1
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:34 pm
I don’t usually buy these mags- but I might have to ck this out :)
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2007-12-12-katie-holmes_N.htm
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:36 pm
what’s up??? Has this site been acting weird for you guys too???
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 9:39 pm
geeze- read this from- digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz
“Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes have attended their second Spice Girls reunion concert in three days.
The couple took daughter Suri to see the band in LA on Thursday and were spotted again in Las Vegas on Sunday night, where they were joined in their VIP box by David Beckham.
Cruise and Holmes have been close friends of the Beckhams since their move to LA in July.
The two couples dined together at a steakhouse in Las Vegas after the concert, where onlookers said they were having “an absolute blast”.
The Spice Girls’ website later boasted: “They can’t seem to get enough of our girls!”
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 10:46 pm
look at who tommygirl took to Will Smith’s premiere- his partner Paula! Wonder why KH was a ‘no show’?
http://www.entertainmentwise.com/photos/39361/28/smith-cruise–wentz-hit-the-town
toledo fan
Dec 12, 2007 at 11:00 pm
oh- GAG;
Entertainment Tonight spoke exclusively to Tom Cruise today at Grauman’s Chinese Theatre in Hollywood where his friend Will Smith’s hand and foot prints were immortalized in cement. Cruise was in attendance to show support for Smith and spoke to ET about their relationship.
“I feel honored to know him and his family. When I get around him I feel inspired. We push each other and we need that. We share that same level of reality and commitment that we have to our craft and to our family. Its fun. Wherever Will Smith is, that’s where the party is!” Cruise tells ET he is even a fan of Smith’s music, “He is an extraordinary artist. When I was doing Born on the 4th of July, his music got me through that picture.”
On if Smith could beat his wife Katie Holmes in a marathon, Cruise laughs, “Kate is fast! I said to Will, ’she ran a marathon, we’ve got to see if we can’t run a marathon. She did it!’ The day after she ran the marathon I was at the hotel and got in the elevator drenched in sweat and I smelled… I said, ‘Listen, when your wife runs a marathon, you’ve got to get on the treadmill the next day!’”
Balletmama
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:26 am
I wonder if he brought Paula so he could schmooze Hollyweird big wigs for his own production contracts. Why else would a person bring his business partner and not his wife?
In terms of the card, it is simple and elegant, Whatever happened to the personal touch: I mean those helpers she has wrapping and shopping for her could careless about what they are doing as long as they get paid.
The sweating thing…EWWWW!!!
taralexis
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:20 am
ah, her card says “Happy Holidays” NOT Merry Christmas. Is it no longer acceptable to send good cheer to friends and family no matter what religion you are?
toledo fan
Dec 13, 2007 at 1:40 pm
caw, caw, HAHAHAHAHA
we don’t pick on the poor toddler- we point out the two b-o-o-bs she has for parents. I proudly show off my kids all the time but don’t take them out ONLY for a opportunity to make myself look good :)
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 8:21 pm
actually i think you need to go back and read some of the things said about her under previous entries. Pretty appalling if you ask me. And what do you expect them to do?? Stay at home and never venture out in public because some one might take their photo. Please.. give me a break. And for the comments on a nappy bag and stroller if you bother to look at all the celebs when they are out with their kids none of them have a nappy bag and very rarely a stroller. I think you will find that if some crazy person or a pap got to close it would be easier to protect your child if you werent holding onto a whole heap of crap. I know when i go out with my kids i have stuff hanging off me everywhere. I also have a comment about the christmas issue everyone is so bothered about. Angie and brad celebrate holidays from their childrens cultures that they themselves are not part of how do you know that tom and katie dont do that for her family?? You all just assume and speculate. Whats the point?? And really who cares?? Does it really concern you what they do with their holidays???? And by the way their is no book on how to raise your kids. Every parent does things that other parents dont agree with. We all just do our best. Im sure they dont think they are doing anything wrong when raising suri. Other celeb kids are trecked over the world. If anything it would open their eyes to other cultures. And im sure the “adopted ones” as you alll call them have school to worry about and how do you know they arent with nicole and keith?? I dont see photos of them as a family either. you are all very one sided in your opinions
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 9:07 pm
and sorry about the mistakes. I would hate to ruin someones day with my errors.
toledo fan
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:28 pm
http://bp2.blogger.com/_e2ljdIfxnyM/Rf6ZQnRUDNI/AAAAAAAABV0/7gWPg7gMInc/s1600-h/violet+1.JPG
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:41 pm
Your right i should of stated jennifer garner as an exception. She has also been snapped with violet in a stroller. Although she had a dummy in her mouth and i would have thought that all you bottle bashers would of had a comment about that bad parenting!!!
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:56 pm
Actually if you go back and re-read what i wrote i said RARELY!!! Im not silly enough to not know that there wouldnt be photos out there to prove me wrong but i think your missing my points about the rest of the things you all comment about or is this the only one that you can find something on to back up your arguments??
toledo fan
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:58 pm
Katie Holmes, Gwen Stefani, and Jennifer Garner all have at least one thing in common. Adorable Ju-Ju-Be diaper bags! The cool thing about these bags is the Teflon coating makes their busy life a lot easier! Check out their ‘Perky Perennials’ (pictured to the left, which Katie has in the Packabe backpack style), ‘Lush Paisley’, and ‘Sassy Stripe’ diaper bags by visiting http://www.ju-ju-be.com. Celebrity Trend Expert Rachel Florio also loves sending them the hip metallic silver ‘Bottle Rocket’ as a baby shower gift! Tom Cruise has the JJB ‘Dad Bag’!
(wonder where Tc and KH hide these diaper bags- under the bodyguard’s jackets?)
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:10 pm
i will have to take your word on it because i got bored looking for pictures on that website. Really though im sure while your googling the net looking for proof you will see more pictures of celebs without strollers and bags than with!!
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:27 pm
bp2.blogger.com/…/s400/tomkat-031807-a.jpg
MMMMMM…. What is that hanging over her shoulder?? Just coz there isnt alot of pics doesnt mean it doesnt happen. I repeat more pics of celebs are seen without rather than with!!
candice
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29 pm
ok so that link doesnt work but if you google “tomkat with suri pics” and search images it will come up. But i cant blame you if you couldnt be bothered. Really there is not much point.
Libraesque2007
Dec 14, 2007 at 10:44 am
what the h e l l kind of GD comment is this??
“Angie and brad celebrate holidays from their childrens cultures that they themselves are not part of how do you know that tom and katie dont do that for her family??”
this may just be the most ridiculous comment EVER
Lilianne
Dec 14, 2007 at 11:12 am
Candice…I can appreciate your efforts to defend this family but you might as well realize that most of the posters here are pretty anti-TC and KH. There are very few people who do defend them that can actually stand the heat and stick around to continue defending them and their actions. I understand what you are saying about the stroller issue because I made the same observation you did many months ago but most people don’t want to listen to logic and reason.
I do want to say that the whole celebrating Christmas issue is one that has many people confused and up in arms. I think this mainly comes from TC and his almost constant promoting and speaking of Scientology. If half of what we read is true he is pretty much always trying to shove his “religion” down people’s throats. For me personally if he is going to talk the talk then he should walk the walk and that means not celebrating Christmas since doing so is outside of his beliefs. And since KH supposedly converted to this belief system then she shouldn’t be celebrating Christmas either. It is just my opinion.
candice
Dec 14, 2007 at 5:08 pm
But that is my point Lilianne. More than half of what the tabloids print is not true. So how can people comment on things that they really just dont know about. It just doesnt make sense to me. I thought as we got older we outgrew childish gossip. If we were talking facts here i could understand but not much of it is. Thankyou lilianne for trying to understand what im saying here it is nice that someone can look out side the box. And libra what about my angie and brad comment is ridiculous?? I saw this on a video interview with angie so i know its true. Why dont you tell me whats ridiculous about it because i really dont understand. Now im off to defend myself about attacking one person under the other post!!
Libraesque2007
Dec 14, 2007 at 5:45 pm
you mentioning B&A has NO relevance to what we’re discussing here. WHY would you even bring them up in that context, it makes NO sense what-so-ever, and I’m NOT disputing that that is what they do.
You’re MISSING the point!!!!
Balletmama
Dec 14, 2007 at 5:50 pm
I guess my narrowmindedness has been replaced by Candice’s!!!!
candice
Dec 15, 2007 at 12:26 am
Actually your missing my point. Brad and angie have been bought up on this website repeatedly and compared to tomkat so maybe you need to re-read some of the previous posts you have all made as you seem to forget the things you write on here. And its in exactly the same context if you bothered to stop and think about it. You have all passed judgement on the xmas issue “that they shouldnt go xmas shopping or give out gifts or cards or celebrate at all” My comment was how do you know that tom and katie dont celebrate xmas for her family or even for the “adopted ones”. Obvioulsy there is a difference in religions but maybe he honours her familys traditions. IT could be a big maybe but its also possible. My point was other familys do it how do you know the cruises dont. I really dont think im the one with the narrowmindedness by giving an alternative opinion. You just dont want to see that i may be right!!!!!!!!!!!
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: