b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Celebrities Channel Subscribe to this Feed

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

Interview With The Stars of Mad Money

by leora on April 15th, 2007

Here’s an article from the Shreveport Times about Mad Money:

Three famous actresses are in Shreveport to steal big money. On the big screen, of course.

"It’s three women together, and it’s crime. How can that not be fun?" Diane Keaton said.

"I haven’t played this character before," Queen Latifah said.

"I’m pumped," Katie Holmes said.

The movie "Mad Money," a heist comedy and thriller, begins shooting Monday in Shreveport.

Holmes and Keaton sat down with actor Ted Danson and director and co-screenwriter Callie Khouri on Friday night for a surprise interview at Eldorado Resort Casino.

Queen Latifah took a break from Saturday rehearsals to speak by phone.

"I loved it from the second I read it," Holmes said. "I love interesting female characters, and this is full of them."

For the movie, the women band together to steal soon-to-be-destroyed money from the Federal Reserve Bank. The characters’ criminal motivations are varied.

Keaton’s character is married to Danson’s. She’s never had a job. He’s lost his. They’ve lost their house. And she’s decided to take their future into her own hands.

"I’ve never really had an opportunity to play a criminal mind before," Keaton said, her bright eyes peeking out from under the brim of a gray hat. "Through this horrible adversity comes this other person, this opportunity to change your life."

Queen Latifah was equally intrigued by her new role. "She’s smart but kind of controlled. She’s the mother of two sons," she said. The star believes "Mad Money" offers a chance to play against type. "Any job that I have where I have to become smaller than I am naturally … is a challenge to me."

Holmes was drawn to her character from the get-go. "She’s funny, she’s smart and just a little bit misunderstood," Holmes said while looking mischievously at Keaton. "She’s involved in this crime, but she’s sort of delighted to just be a part of something and have girlfriends for the first time. She’s a type of person who creates a happier environment than she’s actually in. … I like that about her. She’s a free spirit."

"When you hear who’s in it, the three ladies, you go, ‘I want to see that,’" Danson said. "That’s interesting." The dapperly dressed and wryly funny actor became famous as Sam Malone on TV’s "Cheers." He chose "Mad Money" because he loved the cast, knew the director, liked the script and, he joked, "I’m trying to further my career."

The team sports an impressive list of accolades: six Oscar nominations, including two wins; 13 Emmy nominations, including two wins; 21 Golden Globe nominations, including six wins; 16 Teen Choice nominations, including one win; and five MTV Movie Award nominations, including one win.

What may appear as pressure to perform is secondary to having fun.

"I think you always want people to love everything you do as much as you do, but you can’t really go into it hoping that’s the outcome," said Khouri, who earned an Oscar for writing the iconic "Thelma & Louise."

"You really have to enjoy what you’re doing. We are so lucky to be able to do it. … You want to rise to the challenge of your peers, and this is one of those rare opportunities where everybody’s game is going to be good."

"You never really know what you’re gong to learn," Queen Latifah said. "It’s always a new experience being around new people and watching them do what they do."

To Danson, the team will work well together because of professionalism. "I think camaraderie is an added bonus. I think being really good actors is what makes everything work well."

Source Tags: , ,

POSTED IN: Katie Holmes, Movies

62 opinions for Interview With The Stars of Mad Money

  • Grace
    Apr 16, 2007 at 12:10 am

    Im looking forward for this film.

  • amy
    Apr 16, 2007 at 12:41 am

    ‘i’m pumped’….what words of wisdom…. she is my intellectual idol!! I LOVE YOU KATIE!!

  • Helen
    Apr 16, 2007 at 3:19 am

    Me too Amy!!!

  • Helen
    Apr 16, 2007 at 3:22 am

    NOW people are picking on Katie’s intellectual level? whatever next? I guess people are running out of things to say!!!!

  • Askat
    Apr 16, 2007 at 3:39 am

    Amy, you obviously do not know much about Katie and I still find it stupid that you hang out here more than I do, being a hater, don´t u have anything better to do? I guess not. Poor thing.
    Katie is indeed a smart girl, pretty wise and I don´t mean that because she was an A student or accepted to Columbia. even haters need to know some real facts if they want to make some sense when picking on sb without a reason.

  • amy
    Apr 16, 2007 at 4:00 am

    sorry Askat..you must have me confused with someone else…i only started visiting this site three days ago…surely i am not the only ‘amy’ on the planet…and what exactly, was wrong with what i said above??

  • Helen
    Apr 16, 2007 at 4:43 am

    Well, there was Amy here for a while and I guess the new Amy joined us 3 days ago when M left us.

  • amy
    Apr 16, 2007 at 5:07 am

    ok helen, lets get petty…i post under amy NOT Amy…i don’t use capitals..i am consistant in the name i post under at ALL the sites i go to..i have no desire or need to multiple post under different names..and who is M and why would i join just BECAUSE M left??? i am baffled.. i read about this site from another that i was on on friday…isn’t that how these sites work…by referrals??

  • Sally
    Apr 16, 2007 at 5:58 am

    No worries, amy! some folks here are irritable since “M” left. They misse the challenged dialogue. The women here (the regulars) are very “touchy” You make ANY slight constructive criticism, they pounce. Watch the claws… BTW: this movie will bomb! Diane Keaton is a fabulous actor, but she alone will not be able to carry this whole film. Hopefully, Queen Latifah will take some of the load off. Ready for the claws now…

  • frank from IhateTomCruise.com
    Apr 16, 2007 at 6:47 am

    Hello folks!

    I hope everyone is having a good Tax Day.

    I wonder if the Midget (that’s cruise by the way) actually pays taxes or if in his little, insane world where he is the Messiah he thinks he doesn’t have to pay taxes.

  • Linda
    Apr 16, 2007 at 6:56 am

    Katie is a smart woman. However, she comes across as quite silly in most interviews. I believe it is because she never had the benefit of a college education and time to mature. These things can help expand your vocabulary and intra/inter-personal skills. She uses words like incredible, and amazing far too often. I am quite sure Katie would have gained some valuable maturity from a Columbia University education.

    I do hope the movie is good. The writer is Callie Khouri. She won an oscar for “Thelma & Louise” as a writer. It is a bit of a concern that she is also directing. Her one known film as a director is “The Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood”. That film could have been a good, but was seriously flawed; primarily because of the direction. We can still hope.

  • amy
    Apr 16, 2007 at 7:46 am

    come on frank!! messiah’s don’t pay taxes…they get offered virgin’s as sacrifices…(or wives/beards)

  • amy
    Apr 16, 2007 at 10:05 am

    Sally…
    who was ‘M’ and was she bullied off or something??

  • G
    Apr 16, 2007 at 10:23 am

    If I were given the choice between a Columbia University education and a fake 5 million dollar marriage to Cruise, I’d have taken the education.

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Apr 16, 2007 at 10:36 am

    hey Linda,
    WOW, really….the ya-ya sisterhood, that movie seriously stunk. And I happen to agree, I think this movie will bomb. I think KH made a bad choice with this as her return to work movie. She should have held out, but then again, no one is clamoring to hire her.
    I LOVE Diane K, but……..I think her latest movie with Mandy Moore totally bombed

  • Linda
    Apr 16, 2007 at 11:07 am

    Yes, Ya-ya did, indeed, stink. It some elements that could have been developed better. Bad direction can certainly make or break a movie.

  • Cece
    Apr 16, 2007 at 11:10 pm

    Actually Because I said so did good with 14 million opening day. Other Independent films and Prestigious movies do way lower than those nos.
    Even Academy award movies dont do well at the box office than expected Blockbuster films.
    Critics mock Wild Hogs,Blades of Glory,Nacho Libre,the latest Ben Stiller films and they’re all box office gold.
    Cameron Diaz film with Kate Winslett,the movies of Alba and Scarlett are not good at the box office but they keep working.

    Im excited for Katie and for me she is smart and real.A beautiful person in and out. To me intelligence is nothing when you’re a mean soul and actually some intelligent people use their intelligence in the wrong way. I ignore haters because all their remarks and judgements are wrong and cruel. Truthfully let them insult Katie.
    Its not going to hurt Katie but those doing the insulting. Life is too short and unpredictable to be insulting others. The Virginia Tech incident today is a big example. Who would have thought this tragedy will happen and those 33 students didnt expect today was the last day of their lives.

  • ingers
    Apr 16, 2007 at 11:52 pm

    I dont idolize stars in Hollywood but as far as Katie and Tom I give them credit for not buckling down to their critics. I dont know any of this celebs but only a few are really wonderful people in this business and I feel Katie and Tom are among them. To me they are talented and I antipicate their future movies.

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 4:59 am

    This movie seems like it’s going to be fun. Katie sounds very excited from her comments. I bet Katie really shines in this one.
    Is Diane Keaton the main actress or do all three play main roles? ….does anyone know?

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 8:04 am

    I am puzzled as to why I am considered a ‘hater’…

    I have a full life and am surrounded by many many people who both love me and receive my love back in return…NONE of whom would consider me a ‘mean soul’!

    I am sure the same would be said of other posters whom you also class as ‘haters’

    from what I have been reading on this site for the past few days, it appears that the ‘haters’ simply voice their (opposing) opinion of tomkat, then proceed to suffer a barrage of personal, nasty and even VIOLENT threats and abuse..

    It is apparent that it is the tomkat fans who are the REAL haters on this site…

    Once again,

    this site is
    TOMKAT - CRAZY
    NOT
    TOMKAT - IF YOU DON’T IDOL WORSHIP THEM WE WILL INSULT AND ABUSE YOU!!

    TOMKAT make us all ‘crazy’ in varying ways…FACT! so get over it…I mean, it’s not as if any of you can hold a decent debate on your beloved subject, if the topic gets too hot you *ignore*…very funny!!

  • !!!
    Apr 17, 2007 at 9:34 am

    amy, I myself is a fan of Tomkat we come here to comment on the topic at hand but there are a couple of people naming Lib and Mia who come here to insult the fans and trying to brainwash them against Tomkat. I’ve been around this site for a while and I’ve seen the fans been engaged in a really good discussion and debate to prove their case but those two people don’t have a good debate (they just insult Tomkat and use the same old conspiracy theory over and over again without answering the fans question properly) and they have run the fans patients to the limit. And if there was anyone who has been insulting to the to anyone are the non-fans like those two, so please check your facts. The fans haven’t done anything these two didn’t deserve and use the *ignore loser* because they gave up on them. And I wouldn’t say the non-fans are having a great debate with insulting an innocent child.

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Apr 17, 2007 at 10:39 am

    Who insulted an innocent child?????

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 10:52 am

    !!! - i think i can just about translate what you are trying to say above…ALTHOUGH -
    from what i have read the insults have come from people such as ‘jennifer’ - vile, nasty, aggressive comments that are just childish and nasty…
    do you not stop, for even one moment..to wonder why such ‘conspiracy theories’ are STILL persisting?? I mean come on…where there is smoke and all that…
    and as for ‘brainwashing’ tomkat fans..tomkat do a good enough job of that all by themselves as far as I am concerned..
    what questions exactly are there that you say they refuse to answer? perhaps i can help…
    nows your chance….
    the only ‘debate’ i have seen between the ‘non haters’ here concerns who loves tom and katie the most or who would ‘die for tom’ …

    a concept i find absolutely hideous and WRONG!!

  • Helen
    Apr 17, 2007 at 11:10 am

    OK…I’ll just leave you guys to it and give up this site like everybody else before me. I do miss comments from Leah, bumblbee and co but I guess they have gone where the fans are so I’ll do the same. Anne, Jennifer, Ginger, Linda and other neutral people who come here for the topics I hope you have more patient than I do to stick around. Adiós people!

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Apr 17, 2007 at 11:26 am

    NEUTRAL!!!!!
    yea Helen please go away because you are too ridiculous for words. The only truly neutral and level headed person you mentioned is Linda.
    And Amy, the question the rabid fans want an answer to is the EXACT date Katie gave birth. The problem is, any information they post to back up one of their theories, is obtainable online. Suri’s “real” birthdate is not.
    This is the only way they can dismiss the fact that Katie gave birth earlier than April 18th. If I can’t give them an exact date, then it’s obviously not true.

    So it’s easy for them to ignore ALL the other facts that add up to THE FACT that Suri was born way before April 18th

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 11:56 am

    I was stupid to ask that question about Suri’s birth. I just realised that as has always been said, Suri was born on the same day as Brooke Shields’ little baby daughter.

  • libraesque
    Apr 17, 2007 at 12:08 pm

    Yes what a strange “coincidence” that his then enemy Brooke had her baby on exactly the same day in the same hospital, when a birthing room to the tune of 25,000. was set up in the Cruise household. What a strange “coincidence” that Suri’s birth was the EXACT same date April 18th as the day T&K met for the first time
    What a strange, strange thing that Katies parents were vactioning in Florida the day she “gave birth” and they did NOT fly back to be with her, at all but continued with their full vacation

  • libraesque
    Apr 17, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    Yes what a strange “coincidence” that his then enemy Brooke had her baby on exactly the same day in the same hospital, when a birthing room to the tune of 25,000. was set up in the Cruise household. Stranger still that NO ONE on staff at the hospital saw them come or go on that date, as well as the 100 or so paps camped out day and night at their house
    How strange that out of all the HW births, Suri’s birth certificate is so suspect, full of discrepancies.

    What a strange “coincidence” that Suri’s birth was the EXACT same date April 18th as the day T&K met for the first time
    What a strange, strange thing that Katies parents were vactioning in Florida the day she “gave birth” and they did NOT fly back to be with her, at all but continued with their full vacation

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 12:14 pm

    I didn’t mean to say that Tom haters shouldn’t comment here, if that’s how it came across to you.
    I just try to give my reasons why I think a comment is unjustified.

    And as for threats of violence, it’s all just cheap talk, purely literary. I’d like to think I was allowed to GIVE as good as I GET. ESPECIALLY when THAT Libresque person goes so low as to insult my kids. But that’s just me.

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    Oh! Thank you. I’m such an idiot! So, her birthday is April 18 TODAY!

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Apr 17, 2007 at 12:32 pm

    WRONG Jennifer. In the initial comment I said “you may be some ghetto trash” to which you responded you wished I would get in an accident and be physically ill to my stomach.
    HOW the F^CK is that insulting your children? (except for the obvious…that you took offense so violently to my comment about trash and bastard babies because YOU are lying and have them)

  • LIBRAESQUE
    Apr 17, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    And NO, only YOU would get that from what I posted re: her birth date.
    It’s a waste of time even responding to you, you’re completely without logical thinking skills and you’re REALLY annoying

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    The address stuff, Sorry guys don’t know how to do that stuff.
    LIBERESQUE, I am NOT wrong about anything you said
    And YES I did finally get her birth date from what YOU said. April 18! I didn’t ealise that was the date until you told me. So Thanks Again!

  • Leora
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:24 pm

    Hey guys, there’s some bug on the site that’s giving out people’s email addresses. Please bear with me while this is fixed. Sorry for any trouble!

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    bet you are rushing out to get suri’s present right now hey jennifer?? if you are buying clothes for her she currently fits into the 16month old size ok…

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    Watch your language Libraesque.
    Can’t you respond like adults instead of responding like primary school aged children?

    Suri will be in primary school before you know it and she’ll leave the two of you in the dust by the sound of it.

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    Can’t you two stop whining, sulking, and teasing.
    It’s bloody pathetic. Amy your comments really are pathetic now. Aren’t they!

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    my apologies jennifer…i was simply trying to speak in ‘audience appropriate language’and yes you are right..suri WILL be in school before you know it…seeing as how she is older than they claim…
    by the way, its a bit rich coming from you ‘watch your language’ to libraesque..after your foul mouthed, abusive and threatening tirade to her previously…
    or have you already forgotten…you see…it’s people like you, with attention spans of goldfish…that actually swallow all the PR hype that tom spoonfeeds his ‘adoring’ public…

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    What did I say that was foul-mouthed that Liberesque didn’t allready say to me first Amy?
    I just won’t take Librqesque’s crap. Do you love Libraesque THAT much that you now fight her battles for her?
    And WHAT did I say that she didn’t say first then hey?

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Amy/Lib BTW There are hundreds of people who go on this site, read, but don’t ever comment.They don’t feel free to comment without being attacked because of people like you. Think about it.
    ..not that you care…..

  • Jennifer
    Apr 17, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    NOW can we sit back and look Forward to Mad Money, please?

    Go Katie. I hope you blow them away too!

  • Linda
    Apr 17, 2007 at 2:01 pm

    I find it hard to believe people wouldn’t feel free to comment. For all intents and purposes you may remain anonymous.

    Simply because someone is rude to you does not excuse rude behaviour in return. The “but, they did it first” arguement is used by young children all over the globe, and you, Jennifer, are not a child.

  • Linda
    Apr 17, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    I find it hard to believe people wouldn’t feel free to comment. For all intents and purposes commments here are anonymous.

    Simply because someone is rude to you does not excuse rude behaviour in return. The “but, they did it first” arguement is childish. You, Jennifer, are an adult, and a mother, if I am not mistaken.

  • Linda
    Apr 17, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    Simply because someone is rude to you does not excuse rude behaviour in return. The “but, they did it first” arguement is childish. You, Jennifer, are an adult, and a mother, if I am not mistaken.

  • libraesque
    Apr 17, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    why would I care about people who don’t have the balls to defend how they feel about the stars they worship???????????????

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 2:42 pm

    careful libraesque…they aren’t allowing my comments…and I don’t swear or threaten or even hurl personal insults…bizarre…

  • Miapocca
    Apr 17, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    Kate has always been dum even more so since the world saw her be led around like a puppet on a string…Micheal was so disgusted by her behaviour, he could help commenting on it…..

    The funny thing about stupid peopel is that they give therapeutic laughter, fo rhtey never realise how stupid they are being…so they say the most foolish things which makes one crack up ….

    Imagine among all of TOMKATS friends dumb Kate is the most educated with a few credits, canyou imagine the conversation at lunch…how much did your manola blahnick cost and is it red or winw….hahahhahh

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    to tell the truth, i can’t actually imagine katie ‘having’ a conversation with anyone these days…
    i saw that pathetic cringeworthy interview on letterman before she even signed the cruise contract…this girl is outta her league…
    this is why tom is so deliriously happy…he has finally found the wooden headed puppet he has been looking for…

  • Miapocca
    Apr 17, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    There goes the foolish Jennifer….

    HMMM..JUST because I am doingmy taxes and engaged in a very intellectual political dialogue on another site doesnt mean I have forgotten the three foolish sheperd who watch over the baby SOURI (mouse fr.) when tomkat tries to eat her after ingesting her placenta…ahahha anybody hear psycho…TOm needs to be on a leash and preferabley some drugs other than niacin and oil.

    three foolish sheperd awaiting the birth of SOURI—Helen, Anne and Jennifer.

    Well thanks for the laugh theraphy…no more starbucks…jsut read all the sheer inverse of genius on TOMKAT

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    mia, did you just hear the latest breaking news???
    $cientology has just released its cure for the common cold????
    $10,000 fee for an auditing session, two cups of llama piss and a teaspoonful of corn oil….
    for an extra $5,000 they will cure your dyslexia too…

  • Miapocca
    Apr 17, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    Lama piss..,,girl thats free…just take a plane ride have some fun and get free piss from the locals

    But then scientology always needs money..seems like tom is being tight fisted with his zillions.

  • amy
    Apr 17, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    the thing is that people see tom as very rich and succesful…yes he is…or rather, yes he is rich and once he was very succesful…
    they confuse this with being intelligent, streetwise, clever or even just normal…
    acting (whilst i have nothing against the profession) can make billionaires out of stupid, dumb, common, trash… its an industry about IMAGES…and tom’s has been carefully manufactured for DECADES…
    i can see how someone like him, from his background of a poor, struggling single mother to many children, an abusive father, a history of learning difficulties…etc…who THEN went on to find fame and money through movies.. would obviously be filled of self doubt etc…THATS WHEN $CIENTOLOGY MOVED IN..the rest is history..he ain’t a messiah..he is just some struggling kid with ok looks and a bit of charisma made it big in hollywood..

  • Jennifer
    Apr 18, 2007 at 5:01 am

    This site REALLY DOES interest me. Not interested in browsing and reading stuff on other sites. But here there is a battle. A fight WORTH fighting. It’s worth debating with you cause that way you might actually realise that you people are completely unfair. (Very slim chance) I understand you think Tom Cruise is duping the world and has us all under some kind of spell. Well let us like him. You know you upset some of us when you write awfull and nasty things about Tomkat, you know, and you really don’t care. You are amused by it. I’m here to tell you that is very wrong. This is a free world but you are NOT free to cause destruction and bring people down. People like you should be made an example of.
    If you have deliberately been the way you are then why are you so surprised from the reaction you’re getting?
    I don’t MIX with people like you so I’m not going to hang at one of YOUR stupid sites. THIS ONE IS JUST FINE THANKS MIAPOCCA, but NO THANKS

  • Jennifer
    Apr 18, 2007 at 5:31 am

    Leora!
    would you please address the security issue this site is experiencing with the email addresses…

  • Jennifer
    Apr 18, 2007 at 5:33 am

    !!!!
    so you intend on starting a fully and completely sensored website?

  • !!!!
    Apr 18, 2007 at 11:07 am

    Who said I’m a fan of Tom Cruise??? Katie yes but NOT Tom.

  • Miapocca
    Apr 18, 2007 at 11:30 am

    UNI huh…meaning you are not in america……hmmm

  • Miapocca
    Apr 18, 2007 at 11:36 am

    If you outside of the US , the computing is a few years back in time, so that should be easier and the servers are hellishly slow…Its really makes a big difference after being on US computers….mean all those other countires are sooo slllllllllllllllllllloooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

  • amy
    Apr 18, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    !!! - you are EXTREMELY cowardly!!
    you haven’t even got the balls to give yourself a name on this site…
    i find that very amusing!!

  • Aaron Brazell
    Apr 18, 2007 at 2:29 pm

    Folks-

    We are working with Leora to discover the security issue that is being reported. Unfortunately, we cannot duplicate the issue right now. If anyone comes across an issue where you can see an IP address or email address of another commenter, please help my team out by forwarding the evidence to support@b5media.com. Your assistance in this will help us close the issue. Thanks in advance for your cooperation as we take the privacy of readers extremely seriously.

    Thanks.

  • Shadow Girl
    Apr 18, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    Hehe. Don’t the TC lovers have anything better to do than slamming we haters? The question goes both ways, pals. Don’t bother asking because the answers are all the same.

    I think KH is a smart girl, mostly. She’s too much of a people pleaser and she has to learn to assert herself to get what she wants. She’s being too spoiled by Tom and she has to get the guts to stand up to him. He’s an obvious control freak.

  • Jennifer from Australia
    Apr 20, 2007 at 8:16 am

    Yeah we like to enjoy reading about TC and looking at the pics, also commenting and getting feedback from other fans. But you guys have nothing better to do than make us feel bad for being fans. So to make it a HAPPY place again we spend as much time arguing our piont with YOU as you spend writing lies about us and TomKat…..You guys are control freaks. You actually STOP some people from having an enjoyable time here. I bet some have been very upset by some of your many previous comments.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: