Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

47 opinions for Higher Quality Picture of Suri Cruise at LAX

• Libraesque
  Feb 23, 2007 at 1:56 pm

  OH
  MY
  GOD, she is the cutest baby I think I’ve EVER seen!! She’s a tiny Katie!!!!!

• lola
  Feb 23, 2007 at 2:37 pm

  As soon as brangelina takes out shiloh over the weekends their copycat takes out suri how funny. Why they copy them all the time.

• Brad
  Feb 23, 2007 at 2:39 pm

  Shiloh who?

• kandise
  Feb 23, 2007 at 2:44 pm

  Why she is always with tom’s mom don’t she has her own mom? Suri looks better on this one than the wedding picutre photos.She looked fugly on those ones.

• Claire Cruise
  Feb 23, 2007 at 2:53 pm

  I swear that someone tells our little baby to always frown when the arms of her surrogate mother (… that’s Katie Holmes). Suri is much more aware of what is going on around her than most people think. But how adorable is it to see MY little Suri in a frilly clown collar, already dressed for our spectacular media circus?! It really does makes me so very sad that, as of yet, I still have not been given the privilege of seeing my gorgeous biological daughter in person. I just can’t believe how fast she is growing up.

• Libraesque
  Feb 23, 2007 at 4:50 pm

  LOLA, someone on another site made the same observation, that it’s too weird that the only time this kid had been out was the media circus that was their wedding (everyone predicted Tom would USE the wedding to debut Suri)
  that was 3 months ago. Shiloh has NEVER been photographed, and yet like you said….days later.

  Someone also pointed out the weird coincidence of Nicole Kidman on last nights Oprah Oscar thing, talking about birthing her own babies, and then bam, we see Suri……….weird

• just me
  Feb 23, 2007 at 5:15 pm

  I laugh till it hurts after I read those 2 comments. I think Tom is trying so hard to take over so is the beckhams but….

• Anna
  Feb 23, 2007 at 8:42 pm

  Yipeeeeeeee I have been waiting for this picture like for ages. She looks so beeeeeeeautiful! They should have more babies. Guys you are the only ones who keep up with such trivia of who shows which baby when. Notice that Tom did not show Suri after Brangelina released first photos of Shiloh…whatever. Suri is interesting to look at, shiloh is not big deal? No!

• just me
  Feb 23, 2007 at 10:10 pm

  anna , It is because Shiloh cutie was all over the news and he didn’t want to do it at that time. No hiding was nessesary to make people wonder about her or search about her unlike Suri. Her photo was something people all over the world curios to see.

• Frances
  Feb 23, 2007 at 10:54 pm

  I love this picture of Suri. My mom and aunt were all going awwwww. There are days she looks like daddy and at times like mommy too.
  I understand their privacy for this child. I would do the same.

• Ana
  Feb 23, 2007 at 11:47 pm

  oh come on…get over it!!! why everything that tom and katie do is wrong, now she can’t take suri out because is only for publicity….pleaaseeee

  ————
  Suri is the cutest baby ever, she ’s so beautiful…tom and katie forever!!!!

• Ida
  Feb 24, 2007 at 10:07 am

  I had to show this picture to every one. How can such a controversial couple have such a beautiful offspring? The truth is that I agree Shiloh is rather not much to talk about. Her parents are more interesting. Suri on the other hand is a story unto herself. I know Brangelina fans have to be loyal but man, just look at this beautiful creature, crazy parents or not.

• Kalista Brat
  Feb 24, 2007 at 2:17 pm

  I think Suri is pretty and looks like a dollie! But I think there are some haters in here who are very blind! Stop comparing Shiloh and her, they are on the opposite sides of the spectrum, Suri is pretty and Shiloh is cute! Suri doesn’t always appear when shiloh does, I think you spend your time obsessing over them sooo much that you begin to imagine things! Tomkat are bigger than Brangelina in my opinion! Get off this site you annoying Tomkat stalkers who just wanna put crap on here, go take your meds for your anger/ jealouse/ bitterness disorder!

• Trooper
  Feb 24, 2007 at 2:25 pm

  I agree Brangelina isn’t that big a star anyway, look at the box office for the good sheperd wich also starred Angelina Jolie?

  The Good Shepherd Universal Pictures $53,205 $59,839,040

  The movie has been in theatres for 2 monhts and that is all it has made, it wasn’t even number one in its first week. I personally don’t give a shit about Brad he ain’t even that hot, the only reason I was even interested in them was because of Shiloh and my curiousity to see what she was gonna look like, but I could care less to see their movies, I think the baby is adorable, but please!

  This is a site about Tomkat not the shiteous Brangelinas.

  Suri is gorgeous, and I find it pathetic that you tom haters keep wishing and hoping that Suri will become ugly just so you can be happy, you are racking up tons of nasty karma I won’t be surprised if your babies are born deformed thanks to all the negative energy you have racked up for yourselves!

• bumblebee
  Feb 24, 2007 at 4:22 pm

  oh come on guys…. it´s so obvious why these anti tomkat folks are living here to compare suri and shiloh… because shiloh looks kinda boring, not the gorgeous beauty she was supposed to be with her 2 “hot” parents. Suri is much prettier and they can´t stand the fact. LOOOOOL
  Or is it because she actually *shock* exists??? noooo!!! Lost an argument, didn´t ya you stupid haters?? LMAO!

• Hannah
  Feb 24, 2007 at 4:29 pm

  She is gorgeous! She might just be the most attractive and MOST ADORABLE celebrity baby I’ve ever seen. Although, with those genes, I wouldn’t expect anything less.

• Sasha
  Feb 24, 2007 at 5:41 pm

  Yes, Suri she does exists. And bar none the most beautiful celebrity baby out there, Very exotic looking, beautiful hair, gorgeous eyes. Trooper well said because Pitt will never be a Big star like Cruise.

• Anna
  Feb 24, 2007 at 6:04 pm

  Kalista Brat and Sasha, you have made a point am trying to make all the time. Tomkat and Brangelina cannot be compared because they are in very different leagues. I mean, Brad was a star but not as big and never will be as big as Tom Cruise. Angelina is at the level of Jessica Alba in hollywood. Katie Holmes was also not so big a star, but Tom Cruise practically controls hollywood! He commands 100 million a picture and is the Head of United Artist. He is friends with James Parker, the yahoo boss and the Redskins guy and pulls strings of a whole cult!Who is Brad? Who is Angelina Jolie? Who the F is shiloh?

• fanny
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:53 am

  Suri is just cute, not pretty, her eyes are wide apart and her nose are big and bulbous.

  Shiloh is both cute and beautiful, her main facial features, eyes, nose and lips are just beautiful.

• Libraesque
  Feb 26, 2007 at 11:18 am

  I don’t understand WHY on every Suri thread, the comparisons start to happen with Shiloh, and only Shiloh, not any of the other HWood babies, and there are plenty of them!!!
  I have to address Anna though. Girl you’re TRIPPIN’! “Brad was a star” I guess the fact that he was in the Oscar nominated Babel seems to have escaped your TomKat mind.
  He doesn’t “command” 100 mil a picture, he received that much for WOTW ONLY because he took a 20% gross of the movie instead of an upfront salary, a savvy business move, but NOT a reflection of his talent as an actor in relation to salary.
  What he’s “head” of is a virtual studio (not an actual “studio”) that was defunct and no one wanted. It was his only option to still stay in the business, after his fall from grace during 2005/2006. He BOUGHT that position, it wasn’t “given” to him.
  Who is Brad?? Only the hottest actor out there in his age bracket, not to mention a humble, hard working humanitarian
  Who is Angelina? Only THE most hard working beloved humantitarian who has given not only her money, but her time in a tireless effort to help the less fortunate and to bring awareness to many different causes

  Who is Katie? A regular at Barney’s, and……..well that’s about it.

• bumblebee
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:11 pm

  libra,

  take your Brangelina buttkissing to Brangelina´s sites and chill for them on THEIR boards! ON here, nobody gives a damn about that woman who calls her baby a blob, drags a whole lot of paparazzi on purpose to each humanitarian activity to gather attention and forgets to visit her dying mother over posing for pics in “Hail me” glossy magazines with her bought for yet more attention kids to put on posters “help them”.

• bumblebee
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:22 pm

  Plus, Shiloh was sold by her parents to the highest bidder when she was taking her first breathes for not even a week, Shiloh went missing after that until AFTER TomKat released the Suri pics, THEN Shiloh had her first paparazzi cover.. how´s THAT for a coincidence?

  Brangelina wanted to wait until homos can marry too until they wed, yet AFTER TomKat married they announced their own plans to marry yet too. How is THAT for a coincidence?

  Who is copying whom here?!

• Libraesque
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:26 pm

  If you could pull your head out of your ass for a minute you’d know that once again the media twisted what was said re: the blob comment. When the interviewer asked the question, aj paused for a moment, started to say something and the interviewer interrupted her and said, So she’s just like….a little blob is that it, and aj said yea, I guess so.

  And let me ask you this you unbelievable SIMPLETON, what kind of job as a humantiatrian would aj be doing if she didn’t bring attention to the causes she is passionate about and supporting, not a very good one dumbass BECAUSE THATS THE POINT, to bring attention to them via the media so people are aware and GET INVOLVED
  Her mother was a humanitarian as well, and clearly told her to carry on with her work instead of sitting at her bedsise for 7 years, idiot

• Libraesque
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:32 pm

  BUMBLEBRAIN, ….WRONG, they took a bad situation and turned it ONCE AGAIN into a chance to give to charity. They donated all the money they were given to charity.
  However NO ONE was interested in paying the money that was being asked for pictures of Suri, and you know damn well if they had done the same thing the Jolie-Pitts had done, the money would have gone to a $cientology related charity
  Instead Vanity Fair profitted from the TomKat issue, NOT A NEEDY CHARITY

• Libraesque
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:51 pm

  btw bumblebrain, B&A have NEVER announced an engagement or a wedding, the rags make this up on a weekly basis
  Also would you care to comment on the daily media frenzy that surrounded TomKat at their childrens sporting events, the make-out sessions in front of the cameras AND THEIR CHILDREN and all of their friends…….
  can you say “trying too hard” AND “media whore”

  How about Katie posing for pictures while giving away A TREE at christmas time, care to comment on that??????

• bumblebee
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:51 pm

  oh yeah. they needed to sell their daughters privacy to afford charity. LOL. And that dumbass Brad told starving ppl in India to call him “bread” in their language. How nice.

  and you know damn well that there was a Suri hunt going on, even a bounty up to 5 million dollars on her first photo, THAT´s why they did the photoshoot, to NOT allow paparazzi to make tons of money with it.

  At least TomKat doesn´t play favorites with their kids, adopted or biologial, none is loved more than the other (Angelina on the other hand admitted she loves her adopted children more)

• bumblebee
  Feb 26, 2007 at 12:53 pm

  if you´re not interested in these “media whores” then don´t check out THEIR blogs and websites. Brangelina is ALSO EVERY WEEK in the tabs, with pics…. just the same whoring, only with “look at us, we´re so great… worship us!!!”

• Libraesque
  Feb 26, 2007 at 1:26 pm

  Sources at In Touch and Life & Style feel that Suri’s first pics would garner a relatively paltry $2 million - $3 million. One source said the concealment of Suri “stinks” of Tom trying to manipulate the situation by creating mystery and thereby driving the price up.

  Over at People, a source tells TMZ that the photos would fetch less than Shiloh’s. The source says the main draw is not the baby or Tom but Suri’s mom — “People are fascinated by Katie Holmes, who’s leading such a weird life now,” transforming from an apple-cheeked All-American girl into the Bride of Scientology.

  An Us Weekly source also believes that Suri photos would be a less valuable commodity than Shiloh pics. The thinking — Brad and Angelina were “beautiful and romantic” after their baby was born. The source says the value in Suri pics have more to do with the “freak factor” of her parents.
  And there’s this — One editor told TMZ that the price of the photographs would depend in no small part on where the proceeds from the sale end up, implying that it would be a very different matter if the millions went to African orphans than straight into the coffers of the Church of Scientology.

• Marine
  Feb 26, 2007 at 8:17 pm

  Shiloh was sold for the pictures and one interview on CNN. How come these two are so popular and their movies do not make money.

• Anna
  Feb 26, 2007 at 9:16 pm

  Libraesque, get your facts straight, of course US weekly wanted to sell as many tabloids as possible if Tom released a picture of Suri even if it was not to them. By the time Suri’s pictures were released, Getty images said they was a price of 5-6 mil dollars on them but they were given away free of charge to Vanity fair. Tom can buy Brangelina five times over.

• Anna
  Feb 26, 2007 at 9:20 pm

  He is worth over 600 million.So he does not need money from selling pictures of his baby for charity or otherwise. YourUS weekly had put a price tag of 3-4 million on Suri before Shiloh was born and reduced it out of spite because they knew Tom would never give a rag like that any pictures of his baby.And please decent people do not quote US weekly! Notice that Brangelina’s fame is only due to the scandle they project and sleeze. Babel and TGS both bombed at the both office. Babel opened at number 22 and TGS #9.

• Anna
  Feb 26, 2007 at 9:24 pm

  Please pull your head out of your ass for a minute and know that Tom never ever intended to ask for money ofr any pictures of Suri because 5million is paltry compared to his fortune. On the other hand 4.5 million is manna for Brangelina. Angelina has no project this year and they will live off Brad’s income and the money they get from the pictures they sell and say a ‘lucky’passerby in new orleans took them yet you can see them clearly posing.I mean where would they go without a hode of photogs for a lucky bystander to get so lucky?

• Marine
  Feb 26, 2007 at 9:40 pm

  Anna bravo . Some of us are tired of these two cheaters. One is a psycho, the other has no balls.these photos were sold for charity, but we never got to know which charity benefit from them.I do not think they will be together forever, waiting for the day when they split up. It will because whorelina loves variation.

• LIBRAESQUE
  Mar 1, 2007 at 2:39 pm

  You people with your robot like blind devotion to TC, it’s pathetic. WHY on earth would you bash Brad and AJ for donating 4.1 million dollars to a charity? I mean WHY, can someone just come forward and explain why you believe this is a bad thing???
  Anna, can I just say you are a terrible spokesperson for the TomKat crowd. You fail at making any kind of point.
  The money has nothing to do with it, it’s about making the right choices.
  One couple took control of the media, and donated 4.1 million dollars to charity.
  The other couple did a 22 page spread, and the only people to profit from that was Vanity Fair.

  You mention AJ “living off Brad”….uuummm, and what has Katie been doing?
  Your completely IDIOTIC comment about posing for pictures, are you KIDDING?? Would you like to comment on the THOUSANDS of posed pictures the two media whores posed for on a daily basis if not twice a day FOR MONTHS at something as private as their childrens sporting events?????? Please, share with me how that’s somehow “better” than what anyone else does? You make NO SENSE with your hateful ramblings!!!

  Would you also like to comment on how T&K whored out Suri at their wedding? The first public pictures at that media circus…PLEASE!!! They keep the baby hidden for months saying loud noises aren’t good for babies, they’re afraid of the paparazzi, they’re keeping her “safe” and then they expose her to THOUSANDS of photographers and paps, and flash bulbs at their wedding!!!!!
  HYPOCRITES!!!!!!!

  And lastly, I’d like one of you rabid TC fans to answer this question for me, although I’m pretty damn sure I won’t get an answer.

  How do you feel about Tom Cruise leaving Nicole Kidman FOR NO APPARENT REASON mere months after she had miscarried his supposed FIRST biological child NOT COINCIDENTALLY right before he would have had to honor the payoff of their 10 year marriage contract was due to be up????

  Answers….anyone???

• Anna
  Mar 1, 2007 at 3:36 pm

  Slow down Libraesque, you will kill yourself with a heart attack. I am sure you would have screamed ’suri does not exist’ if she was not shown at the wedding. We enjoyed those pictures mark you.

  Your Brangelina leave a bad taste in my mouth and I agree with Marine, they will not last. Those two are two vile leaches whose charity is for personal glorification and though at first I said charity is charity no matter what the reason, I now don’t care how much they give to charity, they are selfish self seeking whores whose day will come and like many I can’t wait!

  If Vanity fair benefitted from Suri’s pictures, good for them, it was time some one rewarded them for being a decent magazine, now if it were US WEEKLY or life and style rags, then I would complain. Whatever. Tom gives enough to charity and it is his money to give to whichever charity scientologist or not that he choses. Make yours and take it to Africa.

• libraesque
  Mar 1, 2007 at 3:52 pm

  yea, Anna that’s what I thought, you didn’t address one of my comments
  typical

• jen
  Mar 3, 2007 at 1:01 am

  suri is so cute. she’s looking like josh and katie combine

• Nicole
  Mar 3, 2007 at 3:52 pm

  I hate it when people say Suri is more beautiful then Shiloh… i mean …to me they are both every cute but i find that i don`t like this picture of Suri….Sorry but inthis case the recent photo of Shiloh trumps this pic of Suri….Suri is very cute though!

• Nicole
  Mar 3, 2007 at 3:55 pm

  Oh and Ana get a life …I mean jeez “Brangelina gives a bad tast in the mouth” just because Brad left jenn it can`t work?????your such a W.E.F.B.W.P.F.A.O.G.A.T.H.Y.G.P.!!!!!

• bumblebee
  Mar 4, 2007 at 8:43 am

  lepercheque, the only hypocrite is YOU and your fellow “we hate TomKat” robots.

  So, answer ME this: how come in all things Brangelina you say it´s the “media once again twisting things and make stories up every day” and in all things TomKat, you cite the same tabloids as your reliable sources??

  The kidnapping story was made up, if they would care so much, they wouldn´t bring out the older kids so often, would they?! They have bodyguards, so what. So do all the other stars. Angelinas famously hitting and insulting a father in india for wanting to get his kid from school while St. Angelina was shooting her movie. Not tabloid story, it was in the news!

  “Sources” in In Touch (your bible) said Suri was suffering from a harelip, that´s why there was no photo… true?! Nope. She´s a healthy, gorgeous little girl. “Sources” in Life & Style said TomKat would split in early 2006. True? Well, since TomKat married by the end of 2006, I guess: nope. “Sources” in Us Weekly said Katie will never return to work … true? Well, since her next movie was just announced, I guess: nope. Again.

  And about “Tom is done in Hollywood” — how come Redstone just admitted he never fired him? How come he has the whole of Hollywood power playesr behind him? Any other actor you know who makes 1 billion dollars in the box office in one year while being boycotted and “over”? Sorry to burst your little bubble but even if Tom is in the closet and Katie paid off to act her part, he´s still the most sought after movie star in Hollywood as Redstone kissing his dick kinda proved.

  Care to comment on that??

• Anna
  Mar 4, 2007 at 5:05 pm

  Bumblebee AMEN! Many wish that Tom’s career would be over, even Redstone wishe and thought so and look he admitted he was so wrong. Libraesque and her friends are just disgrantled Brangeloonies because Brad and Angelina are sinking from the latest figures of Babel and TGS. Fortune named Tom and the biggest star of 2006 and I bet that will be the case of 2007 and I bet Libraesque and co cannot handle that! First Redstone, I wonder who next! Tom has so much power in hollywood that is why every one licks his ass and will continue licking it for years to come.

  Oh you ‘he is falling’ sayers, heard about his deal with Merryl Lynch for UA? Just you watch, he is laughing all the way to the bank.

• Leah
  Mar 4, 2007 at 5:18 pm

  Just for all of you who do not know, all the recent Shiloh pictures are not a mistake, they were taken and sold by those two whores. Whatever you sell pictures for, prostituting your child is as wrong as donating money earned from being a serial killer or a prostitute. Yes me too, Brangelina leave a foul taste in my mouth and I keep away from their threads. Please take a hint. Only sick people spend all their time on a site dedicated to people they hate! Ever seen any of us on the Pitt or Angelina sites?

• Sasha
  Mar 4, 2007 at 10:11 pm

  I was not a fan of nobody before, but after seeing how the media is trying to bring down somebody for saying the truth. I started liking him because he stays polite and a true gentleman in all this. And Katie i love her for not giving up and stayed in the relationship, and i really rout for them to last. From now on ,i will suppport them in their projects. The media bashing works in both ways , he lost maybe some fans , but also has new ones.

• Kikousi
  Mar 5, 2007 at 7:46 am

  Libraesque, you should find a new hobby. If you donñt like TomKat why spend so much time around here? If you are a Brandgelina fan, go and lurk around THEIR fansites. I really find it a waste of time,for you and for us. I don´t like Brandgelina, AT ALL, but I don´t need to go to their sites to tell their fans about it, why do you? I believe that people donñt really care. Suri is a Cutie, just like her mom! LOVELY!

• dark faith
  Mar 6, 2007 at 8:37 pm

  faniston craizies attached themselves to this cruise people

• dark faith
  Mar 8, 2007 at 11:14 pm

  people at the jolie-pitt sites dont spent their time talking about this cruise loosers.

• juwlz
  Mar 20, 2007 at 9:30 pm

  Hi Libraesque.. good to see some one else can see the myth will come unstuck soon…Id like to know how a 12 week old baby can be so alert or hold its head as good as Suri can????
  Here are some facts…Suri was photographed in her home in early July making her , apparently, 12 weeks old when the pics were taken..
  Published in October issue which came out on September 9th. Vanity fair said “6 month old Suri”.. April to october is 6 months , the time frame is 6 months but not the pics..
  When Katie and tom where here in Australia for Kerry Packers funeral she was due to drop then or was wearing a pregnancy suit.
  I think she had Suri in December and faked the next 4 months..
  Why all the secrecy and Katie only came out for pics when she wanted one taken..
  Theses recent pics of her are a child at least 14/15 months old.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Celebrities
• Entertainment
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture
• Video Games