Family of WWII Hero Pissed Off Cruise To Play Him
Hehe, this story is really silly. I doubt it’s true, but it’s pretty entertaining! If I were the family though I’d be happy with Cruise playing him. I mean Tom’s hot, a great actor and he’s got lots of fans. Who cares if he’s crazy?
Tom Cruise’s adherence to Scientology is causing angst among members of the family of a German World War II hero whom Cruise may portray in an upcoming movie.
Last week, it was reported that Cruise was set to play Col. Claus Schenk von Stauffenberg, who took part in a failed plot to assassinate Nazi Fuhrer Adolf Hitler, in a United Artists project. But von Stauffenberg’s family, which is Catholic, is concerned that Cruise could somehow use the film to promote Scientology, The (Edinburgh) Scotsman newspaper reported Monday.
"I have nothing against (Cruise) and can even separate his work from his beliefs in Scientology," said Count Caspar Schenk von Stauffenberg, the colonel’s grandson. "But I and other family members are worried that the picture will be financed by the sect and be used to get across its propaganda."
The elder von Stauffenberg was on the German general staff in 1944 when he and other officers who vowed to kill Hitler.
Source Tags: tom cruise, movie, wwii, german, movie
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Gossip, Tom Cruise

69 opinions for Family of WWII Hero Pissed Off Cruise To Play Him
Katie Holmes News » Katie Holmes March 28, 2007 1:06 am
Mar 28, 2007 at 12:35 am
[…] Blog Posts Family of WWII Hero Pissed Off Cruise To Play Him Hehe, this story is really silly. I doubt it?s true, but it?s pretty entertaining! If I were the […]
Jack
Mar 28, 2007 at 6:03 am
Tom will pay them off. Or should I say his fellow thetans will. Their good at it. The family is justified in their concerns. Tom is ALWAYS looking for a platform. Just my worthless opinion. Love Suri & Katie though..such sweeties!
N
Mar 28, 2007 at 7:08 am
The family are just looking for some publicity and there is no point talking about this to the media since according to the family I quote “Unfortunately the family Stauffenberg can do nothing about this. My grandfather is a figure from history.”
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2043904,00.html
Jack why would Tom pay them and what for??? The script and the film has nothing to do with them!!!
Kitty Cat
Mar 28, 2007 at 7:47 am
Sorry Helen!
http://www.eonline.com/gossip/awful/index.jsp?uuid=0dbfbf63-fbc8-4b0a-ba9a-f9fc862f0b65
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:16 am
Kitty cat, I’m assuming you’re talking to me..not sure why this is for me??
But you should BE SORRY for providing the above link because I don’t even think Ted himself understand what he writes and I can’t believe your source are people like TED!!lol
You can try but you won’t get far!!!
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:29 am
I am curious why we have to be so rude to each other? We we speak this way if we were sitting in the same room?
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 8:41 am
#6 Mrs. Guttman, You must be new to this site? Well there are two different type of visitors here, fans of Tomkat and non-fans and we mostly know each other from previous comments and that is why we come across rude to each other because we’ve history. I honestly prefer it if we spoke to each other better but when some people go out of their way to post links and gossip to smear Tom and Katie name and leave ridiculous comments, we as fans can’t just leave it.
But if you’re looking for a blog where people are polite to each other then there is the mediablvd forum you can join there, they have rules that everyone follows, its a place for everyone and not just fans.
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:01 am
I am confused. Does being a fan mean that you believe only the good about an entertainer? I enjoy Mr. Cruise’s work… with a few exceptions. I think Ms. Holmes was a fine actress on her way to a great career. Sadly, I think her decision to begin an affair with Mr. Cruise was, in some ways, career ending, unless you consider a constant tabloid presence a career. These opinions aside… the simple facts of Mr. Cruise’s life are not all good and rosey. Why can’t we, fans, see that he is, in many ways, quite troubled?
I was new to this site and your explaination of why people are rude to each other falls short. If you prefer that you all spoke to each other more kindly, then set the example. You have not. If someone make what you deem a ridiculous comment then counter it with grace, facts, and calm confidence.
I briefly worked in the presence of Mr. Cruise and Ms. Kidman a very long time ago. I was an assistant on one of their first films, not to either of them, however. It was a lot of fun, but it was then that I realized the film industry was not for me.
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:20 am
Thank you for your comment and no we don’t just believe the good about TomKat as fans we know Tom and Katie are not perfect and there are things we don’t like but people like Kitty cat and libr try to make this site about religion and anti-Tomkat with ridiculous conspiracy theory so we stand to correct that. If you like go back to a few previous threads to read comments by Libraeque.
I personally find it hard to set example with people like Libr and Kitty when they have already set their minds and they only visit this site and other Tomkat site like babyrazzi for one reason only to spread their hates about this couple. I understand people who just come here to read the news and comment on it like yourself and they can be nagative and positive at the same time but with some people I’ll never understand how they can have a love hate relationship with celebrities and cyber-stalk them when they can actually spend their time on something someone they like or worth while.
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:28 am
And about Katie may be having a family is more important to her than career. here is a quote by her she made before meeting Tom cruise…
“My family always keeps me in check. I have three older sisters, and they work their butts off. They’re all very supportive of my career, but I know what’s really important is kids and family.”- Katie Holmes
Also we won’t know till she starts work if she actually has what it takes to last in the movie business or if she will have a great career or not. I never knew Katie that well before Tomkat but to be honest from looking at her movie history at boxofficemojo and the reviews she got for Batman begin I don’t think her career was that great.
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 9:58 am
Everyone has different opinion about these people but nobody know them personally and aside from Tom’s religion which some people seem to have problem with I don’t think Cruise is troubled.
Here is a guy who become famous in his early twenties and he has never been to rehab or assaulted his partners or abandoned his children, if there was a big conspiracy in his life like some people say it would have come out in the last 25 years where he has been in the public eye all those years. And NO to people who say he pays people not to speak because if there was something big he was hiding that person who talks will get lot more many from the media.
All his 3 ex partners and people who have worked with him have nothing but good things to say about him. So I think he is a good guy who everyone is picking on because he made himself an easily target by making some mistakes and wrong choices, so we’re not all prefect.
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 10:21 am
Not everyone who has worked with him has good things to say. Some say nothing at all. Early in Mr. Cruise’s career his acting coach was also an acting professor at the college I attended. This conection is how I was able to become connected to the film on which I worked. Saying someone is professional on set, shows up on time and is polite does not necessarily mean he is a great guy.
Calling Scientology a religion is up for debate. This debate is in the court system worldwide to this day, with several countries not affording it the tax shelter status of a religion. It is continually challanged in the U.S.
Tom Cruise does, in fact, have a troubled past. He turned to Scientology to help with his toubles, by his own admission.
You may choose to overlook peoples “wrong choices”. This quality is a good one. Try to apply it to those you say things on this site of which you do not approve.
Tom Cruise had made some inflammatory remarks concerning medication. Many people could not live average lives without the help of some of these medications. These comments do not inherantly make him a bad guy. It does however make him judgemental and at the very least, quite rude to Matt Laurer on at least one occasion.
Thank you for your comments. I will most likely not visit here again.
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 10:24 am
One last thing
was your statement with the misspelling of perfect - “we’re not all prefect” meant to be humor or was it an ironic error?
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 11:28 am
HELEN, DON’T LIE!!!!!
You are the most RABID fan, you absolutely cannot tolerate ANYTHING negative said about TC.
Be honest!!!!
Mrs. G, Helen has atrocious spelling and grammar skills which I’ve commented on before, because some of the posts are just hard to read. I think she (and others) made it clear that she is a dreamy-eyed fan of TC, and will never believe he’s done anything wrong in his past, or present.
I too worked in the business and have friends that are still in it (everyone here thinks I’m lying, but I chalk that up to living somewhere VERY far from L.A. All my friends there are involved in entertainment in one way or the other)
A friend of mine worked at CAA and her boss was on the Cruise legal team. She actually saw the marriage contract between TC & NK. The contract they had is not a new thing in Hollywood, but these people can’t fathom that their idol is anything but a straight, wonderful, perfect man, who has, despite his sterility produced a child.
They also seem to overlook the fact that after 10 years of marriage and a month after throwing his wife a big party, he walked out on her, after she had just apparently miscarried his first biological child. When confronted with this FACT, they will either go silent, or blame Kidman, saying TC probably got tired of her
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And I could go on about KH being raised Catholic, saying she was going to remain a virgin til marriage and then poof!!! She gets engaged, pregnant, and instead of getting married, decides to go against her life long religious background, live with TC and his kids, have a bastard baby as her first (and his first, but we all know it’s not really his) all because she doesn’t want to look fat at her wedding
???????????
Yea, no. I don’t know where that quote came from, but the rabid fans will believe THAT over any other theory over why she didn’t do the “right” thing
THAT has been my experience with the fans at this site
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 11:38 am
Mrs. Guttman, thank you for correcting my spelling. Yes I believe nobody is perfect.
*Ignoring losers*
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 11:47 am
Helen, I’m SO embarassed for you. Honey, when you go to high school tomorrow, you may wanna stop by the library and look up IGNORE, because what you’re doing ISN’T!!
1. refuse to acknowledge;
2. bar from attention or consideration;
3. fail to notice
4. give little or no attention to
5. be ignorant of or in the dark about
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 11:49 am
Sorry Mrs. Guttman my last statement (*ignoring losers*) is not for you. Just in case you thought it was and I know doesn’t make it right even if its for someone else but I just can’t help myself with some people.
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 12:54 pm
I went against my statement of not visiting here again. A friend just called to say they saw my comments on the site and read the responses to me. They encouraged me to share my little story…
I have second hand knowledge of the “contract”. A rumor began on set of the movie I worked of a potential legal partnership between Kidman and Cruise. The stipulations were alleged to be that Ms. Kidman and Mr. Cruise must remain married for at least ten years and they would have to bring at least two children into the relationship. The children did not have to be biological.
I must admit, I never put much stock in this rumor. But as the years progressed after the film wrapped and was released (1989-1990) the milestones in the Kidman/Cruise relationship were in keeping with the original rumor. When Mr. Cruise filed for divorce almost 10 years to the day after his marriage, I was shocked. It lent credence to the rumor. It is, at the very least an incredible coincedence, and is most probably fueled by at least some truth.
I am in no way trying to smear anyone. I don’t think marrying to further/or secure your career is any worse than some of the other reasons for marriage. It is sad to bring children into the equation. These kinds of arranged marriages are nothing new in any culture, class, or profession.
The main reason gossiped about during 1989 for the legal contract between Cruise and Kidman was…
-Cruise’s alleged affair with a man, who was willing to talk to the press, and the comments by Mimi Rogers that she had divorced him because he was not living up to his “husbandly duties” (Ms. Robers’ words).
Take it for what it is. Maybe someday there will be a movie about it. Just like all those nasty little rumors nobody wanted to believe about Rock Hudson…
P.S. to Helen.
I appreciate you informing me the “ignoring losers” statement was not ment for me. This fact does not exclude the childish, and rude nature of the statement. Nor does it endear me to you in any way. Please try harder to live an example of maturity and grace. Those behaviors are just as contagious as any other. I hate to bear witness to the death of manners.
You say that you “just can’t help” yourself “with some people”. You must, if you wish to be taken seriously.
This will truely be my last visit to this site. Thank you all, for it has been very interesting.
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:02 pm
No, No, No Mrs G, THANK YOU
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:07 pm
Mrs. Guttman, all I can say is WOW! you didn’t have to make up about a friend encouraged you to share this “little story”. You wanted to share this “story” since yesterday when you mention that you worked at the set of Days of Thunder. So I kind of knew there was something you wanted to say.
I can’t believe I almost took you seriously there for a minute.
You should sell this story to star magazine you’ll make a few dollar.
*Ignoring losers*
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:12 pm
P.S I didn’t even finish your little story. But the start of the story is just laughable and I can’t believe how some people think we that stupid to believe something like this….lol
Edna
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:12 pm
News must be slow to have this crap on Tom again. First that Scieno movie with Beckham, that Aussie racer movie and now this crap.
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:24 pm
* WEBMISTRESS can you please check the IP address of Miapocca because I think she is back as Mrs Guttman, trying to approach cruise bashing from another side* lol
Leah
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:31 pm
I suspected too that this Mrs Guttmna was someone we knew. It could not be libraesque because she is a little more intelligent and articulate (just a little). I guess we should just lump her among the losers.
*gnoring losers too*
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:36 pm
Thank you Leah, its not just me who thought she must be someone we know.
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:36 pm
Webmistress would you please put up my last post? Pleaseee. This Mrs Guttman has Miapocca written all over her. You can see from the way she threatens to quick and returns every time. I almost took her seriously too. Thanks Helen for outing her!
Yeah Leah, we ignore her too.
She has not even said anything new. All that is old trast and I guess every stars has rumours and allegations.
*Ignoring losers, Mrs Guttman inclusive*
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:44 pm
I just laughing my heads off right now this is too funny!!!
*ignoring losers*
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:50 pm
I have been informed by Helen that I am making up the information I shared. She does not believe that I worked on a film set, or that this rumor was going around at that time. I can’t imagine what I would have to gain by making up this sort of a thing. Helen also suggested that I sell the story to a tabloid. I would never attempt do such a thing. Even if I did want to sell the story, I have no proof. As I stated, it was rumor and gossip.
I am not sure as to why it is suggested that I am someone returning under a different name. This site is a bit crazy. Everything was civilized until I shared something Helen did not like.
I am just killing time while I home and unable to go to school/work.
If there is someway I could assure you that this is my first time to the site, I will be happy to comply.
By the way my friend, who you maintain does not exist is a frequent visitor to the site but he does not write. He is keeping me company via electronics while I am home. I am sorry I did not make that up either.
What is the root of all this suspicion? Is a loser anyone who says something you do not like? Could you define a loser as it pertains to this site, please? I couldn’t begin to classify any of you as losers as I have not yet met you.
As I stated in a previous thread we are all a bit of a loser for wasting our time writing here when we could be doing something more enriching. Don’t you all agree? Perhaps, just a little? Couldn’t we all agree on just one little thing before I go back to my real life?
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 1:57 pm
*IGNORING LOSERS!*
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:03 pm
No Mrs Guttman, Miappoca or whatever, a loser is someone is does not make a lot of sense and has nothing to do apart from trash people and camp at the site of stars she really hates. If you were not Miappoca, your first question would have been who is Miappoca. We gonna start ignoring you too. Ha ha ha. This is so funny. I am enjoying myself.
Your Info is not new at all. It is the same old rumours and unless you say Mr Guttman is Tom’s boyfriend and you show us a steamy picture of them, am afraid you are no more believable than your predecessors.
For the record, you have more brains than Libraesque. She is so stupid it is sad. Lol
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:10 pm
OH
MY
GOD
I called it on the Urban thread , I should have come here
Mrs. G, “losers” are anyone with a different opinion
And the fact that Miacoppa has spelling and grammar that would indicate that she’s either a completely uneducated U.S. citizen, or English is her third language, but saying she’s “more intelligent” than I am has given me the biggest laugh of the day.
Here’s what I’ve noticed going on here….a whole lot of PROJECTION. These girls accuse people of posting under various names, when it’s pretty clear that Anna is also Ana, and Anne.
I also think that Helen is Jen from Babyrazzi
Gaelle is also Bea
Mrs. G, I think it must be pretty clear what “kind” of people you’re dealing with here
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:11 pm
Anne, another thing that is making me curious is about Mrs Guttmans age. She say she is just killing time while unable to go to SCHOOL/work. Unless she is a mature student that is weird because according to her she worked on the movie set in (1989-1990) that is 18 years ago? Isn’t that weird? or is it just me?
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:14 pm
another thing I’ve noticed is if you have coherant posts, better than average critical thinking skills AND you intimidate people with these skills, you will surely be called “stupid”
OVER
and
OVER
and
OVER again by people who say they’re ignoring you, but clearly are not
fun, fun, fun!!!
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:43 pm
Yes I was on the film set 18 years ago.
I am 37 years old, female, married, no children. I am currently residing in Austin, Texas. Born and raised in N.Y. I began my post High School Education at Columbia-Greene Community College in upstate N.Y. At that college I met Paula Adams, a drama professor and ex-acting coach of Mr. Cruise. I worked on the film set when I was 19 and 20 years of age. I received college credit for doing so. I acquired my first degree at SUNY Albany. BA in English Lit. in 1993. I moved to Austin, TX in 1994. I acquired my second degree at the University of Texas at Austin. MA in History. I am currently in a CPA certification program. I have never been to this site before. I am sad that there are so many suspicious people out there. I thought it would be fun to do a bit of blogging while I am laid up with a knee injury, but I guess that was a mistake. I will leave you all to it.
Those who are first to suspect are most often the suspicious.
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:51 pm
I’m very suspicious of people who visit fan site of celebrities they don’t like. Its ok if your comments were on a general blog like people.com or even US Weekly but when I see people like the losers I see here it makes me wonder what they are doing spending their time at a fan site starting gossip/conspiracy with no facts.
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Helen,
Did you ask any one to give details of their boring lives? I am also wondering about the age of some of these people. I mean even the most retarded 43 year old can whip up a better conspiracy theory and can atleast have a date of birth for the baby she alleges was not born on the date its parent say it was born.
This Mrs Guttman a.k.a Miappoca started out well but then detoriorated along the way. Even though she was criticising Tom, she seemed to be more intelligent and knowledgable and even interesting, then she started spinning unoriginal tales which if she put in print she would be sued gor Plagiarism by Enquirer, star magazine, intouch and life and style weekly.
I am still laughing at the way you outed her. You go girl!
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:03 pm
lol…Anne, I’m having so much fun here.
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:05 pm
You know Helen, It baffles my mind too. For the life of me I have never visited a site dedicated to a celebrity unless I really love them. Even those I used to love and are now disappointing shadows of their former selves hanging around a woman’s skirts, I stopped vivting thier sites. I do not even visit sites dedicated to hating them and I do not even comment on their threads on netral blogs. For what?
I find people who do it really strange.
If someone has never been to a site before but uncannily sounds so much like another poster (and a numberof posters notice this coincidence)who we declared a loser and ignored till she quit the same. It only follows that we do the same for her reincarnation.
* ignoring losers*
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:09 pm
I do not dislike Mr. Cruise. What gave you that impression? Because I told of my experience? I have not bashed him personally at all. I shared a rumor that was on a movie set many moons ago. It was never in the press, as far as I heard.
And to explain a visit from a non-fan to this site. If you search “Tom Cruise is Crazy” this site will present itself. That is how my friend originally found this site. He sent me a list of site to keep me occupied for yesterday and today. How do you all find time to do this regularly? Tomorrow it is back to school/work for me.
libraesque
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:13 pm
I just have to say you’re all(except one person) full of shit. You all bash AJ & BP and compare these two couples CONSTANTLY (for what reason I don’t know since there’s NO similarity) and you LURK around those threads on JJ, etc
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:22 pm
Anne, the reason I was taking Mrs. G seriously was indeed because she was criticising Tom, but she seemed to be more intelligent and knowledgeable and even interesting, then it was downhill from there.
As a fan I never say don’t criticise Tom but at lease have an intelligent discussion and stop with the never ending gossips or hate campaign at a fan and baby site.
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! He he he! Helen this is getting hilarious. Now our ‘friend sent us a list of sites’are these goofies for real.
I am sorry I thought one had a higher IQ than the other. Now I realise that they are both low level illiterates.
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:34 pm
:lol:
Helen
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:44 pm
Isn’t it funny how Libraloser always find only ONE person she agrees with in all the different threads/sites. I hope she doesn’t insult Mrs G by the end of the blog like she did to someone who was supporting her nonsense at babyrazzi. She ended up calling her idiot! :lol:
Mrs. Guttman
Mar 28, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Is that strange? To have a friend send you an e-mail with links to entertaining sites?
It was my first time to visit PerezHilton, and Pink is the new blog. Those two were my favorites from the list. I must say that the crowd writing here is interesting. You are a bit mean spirited but I suppose it works for you. The bullying is kind of harsh at times. I suppose the anonymity allows for that behavior.
I am sorry if I made anyone angry. I did not bash or disparage anyone here, least of all Mr. Cruise or Ms. Kidman.
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Mrs. G, NO it’s not strange to be laid up and have someone forward you links to stuff to pass the time away
You’re being attacked because your rational. These kids hate that!!!
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 4:52 pm
*ignoring losers*
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 28, 2007 at 5:04 pm
IT WAS A CLOSE RACE FOLKS!!!!
Number of Times *ignoring losers* was either added to the end of a comment, or stood on it’s own as acomment:
Helen-37
Anne-32
Anne
Mar 28, 2007 at 5:13 pm
*ignoring losers*
Yeah Helen I remember that on Babyrazzi, I laughed so hard tears came to my eyes. You know aam pretty convinced that one of these days she is going to turn against herself. She has so mcuh negativity in her that I wonder what her mother did to her. Poor sould, sometimes I feel so sorry for her. She must be deeply unhappy andlooking for ways to let out her bitterness.
Bless her!
B-Man
Mar 29, 2007 at 7:42 am
I have got to say it on this thread too…. Anne and Helen have go to be the same chick. It never occurred to me that someone would do that but they think anyone here who doesn’t like Cruise is one returning person. Well, let me tell you…at my work we have him on our dart board. I work with 25 people and we all think he is a freak. He is a walking comedy. He got braces to fix his teeth? Isn’t Scientology against that sort of thing. Oops… yes they are! They are also against plastic surgery. Maybe that is why Tommy keeps trading in his woman on a younger model.
This site is hillarious! I am putting some of the Helen/Anne comments in my stand up act. I love the -ignoring losers- shit. And especially love the fact that the losers have a way better vocabulary than Helen, Anne, or ME for that matter.
Peace out crazies. That is the name of this site, right? Tomkat Crazies?
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 8:09 am
B-man, you’re just another loser who does not make a lot of sense and has nothing to do apart from trash people and visit site of stars you hate.
This is the first time I saw you post here…is that because you are a previous visitor under a different name??
Webmistress why don’t you put this people out of their misery and tell them our IP address because that will show that Anne and me are not the same people. And I can’t believe you think Miapocca and libraloser have better vocabulary?
Again why do people bring Scientology here again and again and like someone said at babyrazzi finding out about Scientology from you guys is like asking for more knowledge of Islam from George Bush.
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 8:11 am
Thank you for making me laugh about no braces in Scientology and you wonder why we don’t take you guys seriously. lol
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 8:51 am
I just read this quote on another forum and thought it was perfect for Libraloser!!!
“Hate is too great a burden to bare.It injures the hater more than it injures the hated-Corretta Scott-King-1927-2006.”
Just because you have a right to____, doesn’t mean you should!
B-Man
Mar 29, 2007 at 8:56 am
Preach Sister! But you need to practice it too. You are the one name calling. Keep giving me material! I have a stand-up gig on Friday.
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 9:07 am
I’m not the one visiting fan sites of people I hate like Libraloser and you I guess.
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 9:12 am
Name calling losers is one thing…cyberstalking celebrities you hate is WEIRD!
*Ignoring losers including B-MAN*
B-Man
Mar 29, 2007 at 9:25 am
Cyberstalking celebrities …. period…. is weird. This is my third post. Compaired to others, I am hardly a stalker. If Tom and Katie bothered to read some of the stuff you have written they would waste no time obtaining a restraining order against you.
Like I said before I am here for the comedy material. You are totally helping me out.
Sweet, I was hoping to be promoted to loser status. Is it a record to be a loser after only two postings?
Since we are name calling. Your typing looks fat. Are you fat?
Anne
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:20 am
Helen,don’tbother, I think we know who this B-man is and we will out her if she is not careful. She has ever made a comment of all her co-workers hating cruise.
Can you imagine a work place where 25 people are idle enough to dedicate time to hate a star for loving his wife. Of course it is understable if you work in a drug manufucturing factory, a drug store and a drug packaging store. You are scared of losing your jobs aren’t you?
Where is Libraesque today?
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:26 am
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
…………..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
thanks A LOT b-man, I just peed in my pantalones
Anne
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:31 am
Aaaaaaaaaaa she sis back! I am glad. I have suspended ignoring losers for today Ms Libraesque. You are so predictable it is disappointing.
Anne
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:34 am
Libraesque dear, please check the Suri is walking thread as I go get something to eat. Then please give us the exact date in January when Katie had Suri since according to her appearances we cannot place the date.
LIBRAESQUE
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:39 am
are you kidding? why would I do that, I’m still having a shitload of fun seeing you go three kinds of crazy giving dates of when she went ot get coffee!!!!!!!!!!1
B-Man
Mar 29, 2007 at 10:58 am
I work in a bar, hence the dart board. You don’t have to be idle to joke about a star’s crazy life. The dart boards are for the customers. We have never had one complaint. In fact the patrons love it. We have other dart boards with other star’s faces but Cruise is our longest member of the “club”. Angelina is up, so is Michael Richards. It depends on who is in the news of the crazy. Cruise has been up since his Oprah visit. Who said we don’t like him for loving his wife? You guys are totally awesome! Keep the crazy coming! I love that you ubber fans don’t have a sense of humor… it helps.
What happened to Helen? Is she working out? A bit of cardio never hurt anyone. Just ask Jackie Warner… that chick is hot!
Got to go to pour the brews.
Anne
Mar 29, 2007 at 11:41 am
B-MAN, I know who you are. Ha ha ha! You know, if you want to masquerade as a new poster, you will have to do better than that. I am enjoying myself too much to out you now. I am wondering how far you will go. You have more brains than Libraesque but some how you are very stupid too to think that a new poster on the site can have that level of familiarity. The other thing that gives you away is that you hate both Tom Cruise and Angelina. Careful gal….
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 1:15 pm
Anne, I have no clue who this B-Man is but I do think its not his/her first time at this site. Well, when you finish with your fun let me know who this person is ok.
B-Man I’m actually very thin my mum is on my case telling me to put on weight 24/7 so don’t worry. I’m not even close to being fat but you can tell me what your secrets are for being fat so I can put on extra weight.
Anne
Mar 29, 2007 at 1:41 pm
I will Helen I will, it will not suprise you at all. Actually you will be disappointed but let her make a fool of herself some more!
Helen
Mar 29, 2007 at 1:44 pm
Thanks Anne.
B-Man
Mar 30, 2007 at 6:54 am
My comment is awaiting moderation!?
O.k. here it is… the clean version…
Yesterday at 11:52 pm I slapped this up…
———————————
Had to check once I got to work to show the crew the crazy s*** that goes on here.
I love that you think I’m a chick, you know who I am and that there is limited amount of folks who think Cruise is whacked.
Awsome, totally f****** awesome.
We are going to print out this thread and hang it in the bar.
By the way I love Angelina. She is my favorite MILF. The pub regulars get to pick the dartboard faces. People vote and the winners go up. It is a f****** democracy.
———————————–
There it is Jeannie … I got it up for you. Have a good weekend at the pub without yours truley.
Out.
Anne
Mar 30, 2007 at 7:14 am
Try again B-man try again.
You know atleast you are a little more intelligent, retarded but better than some idiots on this site. How old are you? You sound like an amateur liar. But you could write children’s books with your imaginative mind. Ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!Funny.
Though I must say you have as much time on your hands as another poster I know, let me see…..hmmmmmm………..
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: