b5media.com

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Celebrities Channel

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

Adorable New Suri Cruise and TomKat Pictures From Mad Money Set

by leora on May 19th, 2007

Suri and Tomkat on Mad Money Set

Looks like Tom Cruise lost a bit of weight perhaps? He’s looking good! Also Suri is ADORABLE! Love that kid. And Katie Looks so healthy and happy. Love the curly hair on her!

Katie Holmes and Suri Cruise on Mad Money Set

Suri and Tomkat on Mad Money Set

Via JJB Source Tags: katie holmes, suri cruise, mad money, tom cruise, set

betty
May 19, 2007 at 2:12 pm

Suri looks ok in this photo but she look cute in the former one.
Anne
May 19, 2007 at 4:39 pm

Thanks Leora for these, she looks so cute. I just lover her dress and girly sandals. Tom looks young too. Such ahappy cute family!
Sarah
May 19, 2007 at 5:00 pm

DEFINITELY loving the curly hair. She looks gorgeous! What a cute baby, too.
Shae
May 19, 2007 at 7:03 pm

Cute family
Anne
May 19, 2007 at 7:39 pm

The last picture is my favourite. Suri with her Daddy. I am so happy for Tom to have a mini me. He looks every inch a proud papa.
cupcakes
May 19, 2007 at 9:35 pm

This made my weekend. thank you!!!!
Jennifer
May 20, 2007 at 3:32 am

Nice candid shots. I also like the curls on Katie. It’s Groovin’.
Original Original Tia
May 21, 2007 at 3:51 am

cupcakes, I’m so glad to see a fellow dork on this board with nothing real in their life except worshipping my tommy!
welcome!!
Is that Katies Scientology lurking by that tree? She looks like cousin IT
Original Original Tia
May 21, 2007 at 3:52 am

OOOPS, I meant Scientology Minder
Anne
May 21, 2007 at 4:15 am

How strange it is that she looks exactly the same size as six months ago when they got back from their honeymoon!!
Carla
May 21, 2007 at 8:26 am

Anne:

What are you inferring, that she looks exactly the same size as six months ago? WHat I find strange, is that in these most recent pictures, Suri does not look the same as in the picture shown previously, I guess a day or so ago. Then, her hair is all straggily and her face is thinner. Here, her hair looks trimmed and her face looks fatter. Is it possible that there are more than one cloned baby?
Carla
May 21, 2007 at 8:45 am

I’m convinced! The child in the pictures dated May 17 is not the same child in the pictures dated May 19. The child portrayed May 17 is cuter than the child in May 19. What’s up with that? Do they have a real child or are all of these decoys?
kkk
May 21, 2007 at 1:38 pm

What sheer empty brainless individuals
kaykay
May 21, 2007 at 4:01 pm

I dont get it.. This is like my fith time in this site I have read all the comments and i am confused. To tell you the truth Tom cruise freaks me out and I really think that Katie is being brain washed by the scientologists. I have read a LOT about scientology and it is a very very dangerous CULT. they only want your money and if you try to get out of their “religion” they find anything to make your life a living hell. But the point is that I still dont get why Tom and Katie would have a Decoy for Suri or why people say that she had a fake bump when she was pregnant, I mean it doent make any sence. If you think about it if anyone finds out their careers would be destroyed and that is something that they would have to do with the help of others and secrets like that dont last very long!
kaykay
May 21, 2007 at 4:38 pm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=rD9bCdHqU3s&mode=related&search=
kaykay
May 21, 2007 at 4:48 pm

http://youtube.com/watch?v=1j7zK8R-b-k

check these videos out!
Libraesque2007
May 22, 2007 at 10:53 am

Carla, there’s a FREAK on here, I’m sure you’ve seen her posts….her name is Claire Cruise….she claims they are triplets, that the Suri for the Vanity Fair shoot was a totally different Suri than this one……..she may be a crazy beeeeotch but I’m starting to believe her!!!!!

I mean…….Violet A. doesn’t look dramatically different from day to day, no celeb babies but this one does!!!
Libraesque2007
May 22, 2007 at 10:57 am

she’s so fug…..what happened to that cute little Asian baby they had for the VF shoot…she was adorable…but not this one…..eeeesh
Libraesque2007
May 22, 2007 at 11:29 am

okay this baby looks NOTHING like the May 17th baby pics.
The head isn’t even the same shape!!!!!!!
the 17th head is sort of long and egg shaped and this one is shaped like a round fat ball!!!!!!
Harry
May 22, 2007 at 12:24 pm

A great site exposing $cientology with a LOT of info, and links is:

http://www.xenu.net

Another great site, this one is on mind control (I don’t like the term, but the definition and so forth is sound, properly known and explained) is Steve Hassan’s Freedom of Mind. He is a former leader in the ‘Moonies’/'Unification Church’, and has written 2 very good books. He also has a Groups list under Resource Center.

http://www.freedomofmind.net

I wish Katie didn’t get involved in it (Of course, I wish the same for Tom, John Travolta, and the rest). I wonder how much of the other side she researhed before she got mixed up in it. I would hope Hubbard’s science fiction is better than his ‘theology’. It is very poor, and shalow, and is definietely from the uninspired mind of a science fiction writer, or fan.
Libraesque2007
May 22, 2007 at 12:31 pm

what I think is HILARIOUS about all these dumbasss $cienos is that they “worship” the writings of a man who is a self confessed money grubbing do^che, who FAKED his military record, and towards the end of his life was on the VERY same drugs that he preaches are so bad!!!

can you say HYPOCRITE!!!

hahahahahaha, high IQ’s are not what the COS attracts.
Carla
May 23, 2007 at 11:28 am

Libraesque2007:

I showed the two different Suri pictures to different people and everyone said the same thing: The two pictures are NOT of the same child. I hate to say it, and I know you hated to say it too, but I’m beginning to believe this Claire Cruise also.
Carla
May 23, 2007 at 11:31 am

I mean, these two different children, in addition to the one that appeared on the Vanity Fair cover, and whom we never saw again does make the sum of three different kids who were photographed.
Libraesque2007
May 23, 2007 at 11:47 am

I notice none of the rabids have anything to say about this, they’ve gone silent because it’s OBVIOUS. No matter how a child is photographed they aren’t going to appear to have an egg shaped head, then a fat face and round ball shaped head two days later.
The thing that’s so clear about TC is that with his postion in the COS rising, his arrogance has become astronomical. They don’t even think the public will notice or question ALL these things that are so blatantly WRONG about this “family”
It’s also VERY apparent when you read interviews with him.
Carla
May 23, 2007 at 11:48 am

The question is; why would there be three different Suri’s? What would be the reason behind photographing three different children all the time? Is one of them the real one, and the others are “doubles” or did something happen to the “real” one and they are using different kids to play the role, just like the producers do in the sitcoms? It is evident that the one with the long, thinner face and bangs in her eyes is much cuter than the one with the fat, chubby face with the trimmed bangs.
Carla
May 23, 2007 at 11:53 am

Now, the skeptisim is brought to the surface again. Why did no one ever see KH in the hospital, and what was the reason why she and her baby were out of sight for awhile after the so-called birth date? Did she lose the baby and they had to find a replacement? Was she never really pregnant? Or, are they showing another child in her place to pretend that she is better looking than she really is?
Libraesque2007
May 23, 2007 at 11:54 am

hard to say…….they REALLY do look like two different babies.
Remember when TC had reportedly made a Suri “doll” to throw off the paps, before the VF spread?

If you compare the pic or them after the honeymoon, that baby (with the hard sole shoes on at 7 months!!) looks almost BIGGER than these babies….how can a child NOT grow in 6 months????
The whole thing is just….bizarre
Carla
May 23, 2007 at 12:02 pm

Is that why the kid always pulled away from both KH and TC in the pictures, because they were really strangers to her? Is that why the child always looked older, because she actually was an older child that they found, to portray as their child? The entire concept of KH becoming pregnant almost immediately after meeting TC is also a mystery. Why would she want to do that, when she never became pregnant with her boyfriend and fiance of over 5 years?

One explanation is that SUri is really Chris Klein’s kid, and we are seeing a different kid, when she is staying with her real father. They can’t go into the public without a child, so they use a “double”. Makes sense?
Libraesque2007
May 23, 2007 at 12:24 pm

well, people sepculated in the photo after the honeymoon with the hard sole shoes, that the child was MUCH older than they claimed, and her body language in the photos (the now ever present pushing away with one arm) seemed to be that of an older child who was beginning walking (like an 11 month old) and wanting to get down, despite the presence of photographers.

There was A LOT of speculation about those hard sole shoes, then low and behold, in every photo after, she did not have shoes on, ever.

The theory is that Katie was pregnant and didn’t know it yet when she met TC.
True, she was with Klein for a long time and even spoke at high schools that she would remain a virgin til marriage.
She dated Hartnett right after Klein. She had just bought a place in NY. I believe the June issue of InStyle in 2005 she raved about being on her own, about how excited she was to start her new life in NY. Maybe she felt like it was time to abandon the old Katie when she got with Hartnett.

Enter Cruise. What better way to squash the resurfacing gay rumors, and looming tell-all book? Be ecstatic about your new beard being knocked up!!! Now not only are you not gay, but by some miracle, even though you’re sterile, you’re gonna have a baby.
I would have jumped on a couch too.
Carla
May 29, 2007 at 8:51 am

Libraesques2007:

I am with you on this 100%. Someone is rotten in the state of Denmark, so to speak. The kid looked old in Dec. 06 and hasn’t changed that look since. Six months later, and the kid still hasn’t gotten any older looking. WTF! That is hard to explain. But I have to agree with you; that kid has been walking since Dec. 06, 5 months before it’s year old birthday, which makes it approx. 7 months old in Dec. Is it possible, that she gave birth to twins, and that’s why her belly looked huge one month, then smaller the next? She gave birth to one of them one or two months earlier than the other? I’m just speculating here.
Celeb Warship - Taking aim at everyone. TomKat Pt. 2 In the Works at
Jun 2, 2007 at 11:32 am

[…] Source […]